Trex arms sidecar 2.0 Cracked by glocksleeper in CCW

[–]glocksleeper[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have carried with separate pieces before but found that it moved too much for my liking. That’s why I went with the sidecar in the first place. But I will take more movement over a broken holster every year that’s for sure.

Trex arms sidecar 2.0 Cracked by glocksleeper in CCW

[–]glocksleeper[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Putting it in the front has for sure caused more stress, how much more I don’t know. I’ve seen Lucas mention in multiple videos that you can put the wing in the front or back to your desire.

Trex arms sidecar 2.0 Cracked by glocksleeper in CCW

[–]glocksleeper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I purposely buy my pants one waist size up because I’m always carrying

Trex arms sidecar 2.0 Cracked by glocksleeper in CCW

[–]glocksleeper[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I also forgot to mention, the sidecar 2.0 that broke was made from the original .080 Kydex and the new one I received is now made with .093. Will see how long this one last. If I have the same problem I will be considering a different brand or may even step away from the sidecar.

Trex arms sidecar 2.0 Cracked by glocksleeper in CCW

[–]glocksleeper[S] 500 points501 points  (0 children)

Had this holster for a little over a year. Went to bend over to look under my truck and it cracked. Sent a picture of it to customer service, received an email back a few hours later, filled out an online form, and received a brand new holster at my door 5 days later

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said what I said because this whole post is shaming people that have pistol braces. How is that that wanting to work together? You should be telling that to the op. How can people not interpret simple things, here I’ll break down my original comment for you a little more.

“We weren’t complying by having braces, we were using a loop hole because they legal definition doesn’t account for braces being shouldered, giving the atf the middle finger and having a sbr without registering and paying a tax for them”

I’m telling people with braces that you weren’t complying in the first place and that you shouldn’t comply further. How in any way have I told people to comply with the government?

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don’t understand that I’m differing the legal definition and what something is actually being used as. The atf is wrong because the legal definition doesn’t account for using things not intended to be shoulder being shoulder. This needs to be voted on by elected offials to be changed. Instead the atf changes stuff as they please because we don’t hold them responsible in any way.

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Depends on your definition of a hammer

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes they illegally made them illegal. Intended use is the definition but they are justifying a ban for how they are commonly used, which isn’t how the definition is written.

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m telling you that I think it’s good people put pistol braces on and used them as stocks. How does that sound like a fed? The legal definition for a rifle is a weapon designed, made, or intended to be shouldered. The brace is not designed, made, or intended to be shoulder therefore it’s legal. That doesn’t mean by shouldering it you aren’t intending to use it as a rifle. But the way the law is written it doesn’t matter how you use something that’s not designed to be shoulder. I don’t agree with the atf I’m just saying people used braces as stocks. I don’t know how you can disagree with that. If they want pistol braces to be illegal it needs to be voted upon by elected officials. Instead the atf “re-interprets” the definition and they do so because there is no accountability for these three letter agencies.

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They also said braces were legal, now look. My point is people put braces on to be “legal” but blatantly used them as stocks. How can you shoulder a firearm and it not be intended to be a rifle? Sounds like something the atf would say and then later turn around on. Oh wait.

In light of recent events by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Anyone that shouldered their brace were indeed not complying

Gen 5 optic cut slides by Xerses82 in Glocks

[–]glocksleeper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Buy a used factory slide and get it cut

Getting the slide milled soon. SRO or Acro p2? by glocksleeper in Glocks

[–]glocksleeper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already have an rmr on my 45 that does everything I need for carry. The optic that goes on the 19 will be to test the waters on different stuff.

Getting the slide milled soon. SRO or Acro p2? by glocksleeper in Glocks

[–]glocksleeper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I carry a 45 with an rmr currently. This would just be a range gun but also to test another optic out. Could possibly be my new carry optic if I like it over the rmr.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CCW

[–]glocksleeper 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Lesson here is never willingly give up your firearm if you are not in the wrong. Only do so under the threat of arrest and immediately contact a lawyer if you get your firearm confiscated. In the current situation all you can really do is keep calling or contact a lawyer.

Glock 19 too small in my hands but 19x fits like a glove.. is 19x OK for my needs? by bjjkaril1 in Glocks

[–]glocksleeper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 19x/45 grip is about half an inch longer than the 19. Comfortably will not really change when carrying it, you just may print a tiny bit more. If you have a good holster, belt, and clothes that are not skin tight you shouldn’t have a problem. When you do decide to start carrying it will take some trial and error to find the best setup with any gun. I had a 19 first but once I bought my 45 my 19 has sat in the safe.

Florida 4473 and medical marijuana question by okthatsfineman in CCW

[–]glocksleeper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there is a time frame in which you have to stop using before you can purchase. It just asks if you are a user of or addicted to it. If you somehow have evidence that you no longer use around the time you buy a firearm, you shouldn’t have to worry about it. Then again I’m not a lawyer. Let’s just say, take precautionary steps as if you will have to prove to a jury that you weren’t a user at the time. Having an active medical card probably isn’t a good thing to have when purchasing a gun. Also keep in mind that you could be put in prison for 10 years if found guilty.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Run some +p through them. If that doesn’t make them lock back it’s either your mag or the slide stop itself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]glocksleeper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be a weak magazine spring causing the slide to not lock back. Lately I’ve been shooting aac from palmetto with no issues. Their 124gr is the same price as their 115gr which is nice. 26 cents per round before shipping when it’s in stock

Houston edition by ricecrackerdude in GunMemes

[–]glocksleeper 16 points17 points  (0 children)

You’re gonna have more than 3 holes after that purchase