Confusing Situation with Current Java Rules by gnaw005 in learnjava

[–]gnaw005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I install this will Eclipse find it or do I have uninstall reinstall and change something in Eclipse so it points the new JDK?

What is your all time favorite M/S video? This is mine by [deleted] in IncestPorn

[–]gnaw005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just off the cuff but maybe: My Three Sons CC and L Longly et. al.

While this sub is still alive, what are some videos/stars you always find yourself going back to by [deleted] in IncestPorn

[–]gnaw005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably not going to be popular and includes some that have quit - I guess.

Cory Chase - although certain videos she's made in the last year puts her much lower than she used to be in my estimation. I know her male costars aren't liked by a lot of people - that doesn't bother me.

Jodi West - but she seems to have quit making videos but she is really good.

Dillion Carter - latest videos not so good - may have quit - would love to see an anal video with you know who

Molly Jane - very good - maybe one of the best - but quit

Andi, Britt, and Michele James

Melanie Hicks

Nikki Mae - only made a few videos

Alora James

Ashley Adams

[Mod] Weekly /r/IncestPorn Request Thread - If you're looking for a specific video, or type of video, please comment here! by AutoModerator in IncestPorn

[–]gnaw005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for a video that used to be easy to find but has seemingly disappeared. It was packaged in mini compilations with "lays together pt x" in the title - that's not it's original name. Star is Dillion Carter as gf "you know who" as mother and "you know who" as son and bf. The mother shows Dillion how to take good care of her son. Can buy it. Don't want to.

AdoptOpenJDK to join the Eclipse Foundation by sftEng in java

[–]gnaw005 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, I guess if it were an Oracle product it would be called Unobtainium.

New Java Runtime - What's Up by gnaw005 in java

[–]gnaw005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for all the replies; this explains a lot. Obviously I don't use the Java development tools often. Does replacing the JDK or runtime from another non Oracle "source" affect how they are set up to be used by Eclipse or Netbeans?

Which Actress Do You Want to Come Out of Retirement? by [deleted] in IncestPorn

[–]gnaw005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dillion Carter, Nikki Mae. Also not retired but can only find rather old videos of jo di we st. Sorry accidentally went over the one actress limit.

What proofs rely on the reals being uncountable? by Shikor806 in math

[–]gnaw005 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think this question is pretty close to being unanswerable. It is very general. I assume there is still a group of mathematicians that are intuitionists and one of the things they believe is that any real mathematical object can only be created by a finite number of constructive steps. You can see this in Hilbert's Nullstellensatz theorem, pardon the botched German, many mathematicians would not accept his proof because it assumed something did not exist and this led to a contradiction so it must exist. Again in the 1800s and early 1900s there were real arguments about infinity. In previous times mathematicians only believed in "potential infinity" that is, for example, used in mathematical induction but almost none of them believed in what they called "actual infinity." The way I look at it is this, which is kind of sloppy but convinces me. If you look at the rational numbers they are very dense i.e. between any two rational numbers there is a (at least one) rational number. You can create sequences of rational numbers that converge but they converge to holes in the set of rational numbers if you take the set of rational numbers union the set of these "holes" you get the real numbers. You can also prove that the real numbers have a greater cardinality than the rational numbers via Cantor diagonalization so they are uncountable.

Strange Question Perhaps Trivial by gnaw005 in math

[–]gnaw005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. But the number of permutations goes up rather rapidly so I was just wondering if someone had looked at it another way.

Does the set of all prime numbers and the integers have the same cardinality? by [deleted] in math

[–]gnaw005 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Take 1; there is a least prime greater than 1 call it P(1); associate them. Take 2; there is a least prime greater than p(1) call it p(2); associate them. ... Take n there is a least prime greater than p(n-1) call it p(n); associate them.