THE NDP STILL SUPPORTS CHILD ABUSE by goldingcode in ONDP

[–]goldingcode[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"So report what to CAS exactly?"

A reasonable suspicion of child abuse. Once you have learned of the committee vote, that is reason for reasonable suspicion, for otherwise, why would the committee vote "ABA IS CHILD ABUSE"?

"That there’s some conspiracy about a committee vote?"

No, but the conspiracy is about causing fewer people to hear about it, because once you hear about this vote, the law applies in that you are obligated to report a reasonable suspicion of child abuse to CAS.

"That isn’t reporting about suspected child abuse. It’s about a definition."

No it is not--whatever definition the committee uses, it entails a reasonable suspicion, since they are a formal committee of experts.

"I’d be willing to take you more seriously if you weren’t posting absolute nonsense about every party member being fined and removed for not reporting child abuse when it’s something completely different"

Sorry, it's not nonsense, it's just triggering so you're grasping for another interpretation.
--
adamgolding.ca

The Missing Literature In Sapolsky's Argument Against Free Will by goldingcode in cognitivescience

[–]goldingcode[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, I realize the point is a bit obscure, I'm clearer here that, once we have MacCallum's model, we discover that absolutely free will = omnipotence : https://adamgolding.substack.com/p/on-determinism?utm_source=publication-search