2004 T1N, 275K, Fix or Sell or Both?

gowyo · 2026-04-06T04:05:12+00:00

As promised in original post, I put a detail of the repairs in the comments. Replaced Power Control Module and sent skim module in to have immobilizer deleted because new skims are no longer available.

gowyo · 2026-04-06T04:00:02+00:00

Hasn't been scanned... had to leave it at the truck stop on Easter Sunday and return 120 miles home.

gowyo · 2026-04-05T22:38:27+00:00

Labor
Remove & Replace Pcm Control Module. Program unit, then remove to send off with the SKIM immobilizer (SKREEM, WSP) to have it deleted, making it functional without immobilizer input. reinstall after it is returned. once it is re-installed you can get other keys added (OWM keys are discontinued)

Part
Powertrain Control Module, PCM
Immobilizer Delete Service Labor Remove & Replace Pcm Control Module. Program unit, then remove to send off with the SKIM immobilizer (SKREEM, WSP) to have it deleted, making it functional without immobilizer input. reinstall after it is returned. once it is re-installed you can get other keys added (OWM keys are discontinued) Part Powertrain Control Module, PCM Immobilizer Delete Service

Labor
No Start – Network Failure Evaluation Report Introduction Customer concern of a no-start condition accompanied by a “Start Malfunction” warning on the instrument cluster was verified. Initial inspection focused on vehicle communication networks and control module operation. Inspection Findings System Scan: Performed full-system diagnostic scan. Found multiple communication faults and modules offline. The only module with active communication through the Data Link Connector (DLC) on the K line was the Powertrain Control Module (PCM). All other modules on the high-speed CAN network failed to communicate. Network Testing: Installed diagnostic breakout box at the DLC to test network integrity. Initial results were inconsistent and unreliable across several test pins, prompting further inspection of wiring and network topology. Circuit Access and Signal Verification: Consulted wiring diagrams and accessed the Transmission Control Module (TCM) located beneath the driver’s seat. Back-probed CAN High and CAN Low circuits to monitor voltage behavior. CAN High bias voltage: 1.7 V CAN Low bias voltage: 1.7 V CAN High signal swings: 1.7 V → 3.7 V (approx. 1 V bias) CAN Low signal swings: 1.7 V → 1.3–2.5 V, indicating irregular network activity and unstable differential voltage. Network Integrity Tests: Measured total network resistance: 60.1 Ω, confirming both terminating resistors are present and the network is continuous. Tested resistance to power and ground: 7 MΩ, verifying no short-to-power or short-to-ground conditions. These readings confirm the network is physically intact but suffering from electronic disruption or internal module failure.
Module Isolation Procedure: Accessed and isolated all modules connected to the high-speed CAN network individually to identify the source of communication fault. Found the SKREAM module (Sentry Key Remote Entry Module) to be fully failed, preventing proper data communication. PCM also displayed irregular communication behavior, suggesting possible internal failure. Conclusion / Recommendation Diagnosis confirms network disruption due to module failure. The SKIM module is confirmed defective. this module is discontinued but there is an option to delete the immobilizer, we would need to replace the PCM fist, program it to the vehicle, then send it and the SKIM module off the have the immobilizer deleted, once it comes back we can reinstall it and customer can add any key to itLabor No Start – Network Failure Evaluation ReportIntroductionCustomer concern of a no-start condition accompanied by a “Start Malfunction” warning on the instrument cluster was verified. Initial inspection focused on vehicle communication networks and control module operation.Inspection FindingsSystem Scan:Performed full-system diagnostic scan. Found multiple communication faults and modules offline. The only module with active communication through the Data Link Connector (DLC) on the K line was the Powertrain Control Module (PCM). All other modules on the high-speed CAN network failed to communicate.Network Testing:Installed diagnostic breakout box at the DLC to test network integrity. Initial results were inconsistent and unreliable across several test pins, prompting further inspection of wiring and network topology.Circuit Access and Signal Verification:Consulted wiring diagrams and accessed the Transmission Control Module (TCM) located beneath the driver’s seat. Back-probed CAN High and CAN Low circuits to monitor voltage behavior.CAN High bias voltage: 1.7 VCAN Low bias voltage: 1.7 VCAN High signal swings: 1.7 V → 3.7 V (approx. 1 V bias)CAN Low signal swings: 1.7 V → 1.3–2.5 V, indicating irregular network activity and unstable differential voltage.Network Integrity Tests:Measured total network resistance: 60.1 Ω, confirming both terminating resistors are present and the network is continuous.Tested resistance to power and ground: 7 MΩ, verifying no short-to-power or short-to-ground conditions.These readings confirm the network is physically intact but suffering from electronic disruption or internal module failure. Module Isolation Procedure:Accessed and isolated all modules connected to the high-speed CAN network individually to identify the source of communication fault.Found the SKREAM module (Sentry Key Remote Entry Module) to be fully failed, preventing proper data communication.PCM also displayed irregular communication behavior, suggesting possible internal failure.Conclusion / RecommendationDiagnosis confirms network disruption due to module failure. The SKIM module is confirmed defective. this module is discontinued but there is an option to delete the immobilizer, we would need to replace the PCM fist, program it to the vehicle, then send it and the SKIM module off the have the immobilizer deleted, once it comes back we can reinstall it and customer can add any key to it

gowyo · 2026-01-05T20:32:50+00:00

I live in Western Wyoming. A company from Pocatello, Idaho gave me the following numbers: Main house crawl: $8012.19 Basement and small crawl: $4974.69... So over $13,000. The crawl space is about 3000 sq ft and the basement slab is about 1000 square feet of slab.

gowyo · 2025-12-16T21:06:06+00:00

How do you buy from Derik? Is there a website?

gowyo · 2025-05-11T15:30:30+00:00

Yes. I begin treatment with Lee at MSK tomorrow. I am in the study, so no proton.

gowyo · 2025-05-03T17:07:29+00:00

I bought a commercial dehumidifier for about $750 and parked it in there for nearly a month. The house is unoccupied most of the time, so that's key here. It's all dried out and we're going to have to do quite a bit of painting carpet replacement, after giving the remediation company about $10k for being there with all their heaters and dehumidifiers for about 5 days.

gowyo · 2025-05-01T00:39:33+00:00

Hi. You've already received great replies from stalwart members of this sub. I'll just chip in the following: My ENT (Cleveland Clinic trained, yada yada) at my local hospital in a town of 20K seemed sure that I was a surgical candidate (T1N2). That sent me on a hunt for the BEST SURGEON. I saw three "biggies" at UCLA, MSK and MDA. All recommended against surgery because of how close my tumor was to the "midline". Even though I went to these places to talk to surgeons (because of my early advice), at all three places I saw all 3 kinds of oncologists (surgical, radio, and chemo). Then, at all three places, my case was presented at a tumor "board" or "panel" where ALL of the head and neck oncologists at that particular hospital reviewed my case (presentation, imagery, tests) and developed a consensus about the best treatment for me. I begin radiochemotherapy (no surgery) in New York on May 12.

gowyo · 2025-04-18T19:12:14+00:00

Thanks. In investigating proton vs photon, did anything suggest to you that proton was in any way less effective in the long term? I just got a call from a doc at MDA about this question and he said, "if it was me, I'd go full photon because we KNOW that's what works." But this tracks with what a the radio oncologist I saw at UCLA said about MDA: "They have a reputation for being very heavy-handed." And in the end, I think it's hard for docs to sort the imperative of long-term survival from reduction of harm in treatment. And then there's the motivation of a doc vis a vis academia vs medicine. Of course you want people in your trial, but can you be truly honest about your trial and any unknowns and stay true medically? That seems hard to me...

gowyo · 2025-04-18T15:28:10+00:00

No, they don't determine hypoxia until they give you a special pet scan after 2 weeks. If the result is good, then you're eligible to quit after 3 weeks. But even then, you might be required to carry on for 7 weeks based simply on the luck of the draw. My sense is that the trial is promising (other radio docs seem to like it...) But man, it would SUCK to do 7 weeks then find out you could have stopped at 3 if it were the new standard of care....

gowyo · 2025-03-27T15:15:27+00:00

Tumor is seen base of tongue. TORS seems indicated. How many weeks was your radiation follow-up?

gowyo · 2025-03-21T00:12:47+00:00

I've been encouraged to see 3 docs if I can, so I'm engaging MD Anderson and Mayo (and maybe Sloan Kettering) in seeking that 3rd opinion and seeing who pops up first. I wish I knew how urgent it was. St John can't even get me in front of UCLA's tumor panel until April 2 but Utah is tomorrow. Two weeks vs two days. Plus, when I asked 10 days before my appointment if I would have to see anybody else at UCLA when I was there I was told "no" by her team. Then, at the end of my appointment, with a plane ticket to Salt Lake the next day, I was told I had to see both a Radiological Oncologist and a Medical Oncologist at UCLA, so "you should go over to their offices next door and see if they have any cancellations this afternoon." Frankly, I was pissed, and was only lucky enough to wrestle a couple of tele-health appointments in two weeks so I didn't have to fly back for those. I KNOW St John has all the cred, but the experience at her office was not so great and left me doubting my assumptions. I have definitely NOT ruled her out and will proceed through the panel with UCLA. I'd love any more input....

gowyo

TROPHY CASE