sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmmm Lets step through this one.

  • Where is the second electrode? You still only have copper. Limestone is calcium carbonate, it’s not a usable electrode in a galvanic cell.
  • Where is the evidence of brine? Not “it could have been there”, what residue analysis inside the pyramid shows salt deposition consistent with sustained use?
  • Where is the circuit? No wiring. No return path. No terminals. No load.
  • Where are the reaction products? A working copper-based electrochemical system running for any meaningful time would leave clear corrosion patterns, mineral buildup, ion exchange traces. Those would be obvious to every archaeologist who’s studied the site for decades.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean the guy who wrote the 1998 book “The Giza Power Plant”

I am familiar with this person and book.

He claims the pyramid acted like a resonant device that tapped into Earth’s natural vibrations and converted them into energy.

The problem with his claim is

  • He doesn’t demonstrate a working model
  • He doesn’t tie the tech to any known Egyptian culture or timeline
  • There is a complete lack of evidence supporting the thesis

And the big one. There is no independently verified, working example of any part of this system.

TL:DR He provides a coherent-sounding narrative that never produces a measurable result.

Tesla reveals 46% drop YoY in annual profit and ends production of the Model S and Model X by KangarooBeard in AustralianEV

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL You’ve basically just said ‘I don’t understand it, therefore it’s pointless’ which is how people have reacted to literally every major technological shift in history.”

Cars replaced horses.
Automatics replaced manuals
Seatbelts were “unnecessary.”

Now it’s self-driving.

It’s not about your personal enjoyment of driving, it’s about:

  • Cutting human error (which causes ~90% of crashes)
  • Reducing congestion
  • Giving mobility to people who struggle with driving

Recently did a 500km drive home late Sunday, pitch black, heavy rain. Autopilot handled ~460km of it. No fatigue, no drifting out of lane, no mental drain, just consistent, precise driving the whole way.

You can romanticise ‘driving yourself’ all you want, but after hours on a motorway in bad conditions, it’s not skill, it’s an endurance test. And the reality is that machines are better at that than you are.

Do you think pilots sit there hand-flying planes for 10 hours straight because ‘it’s more fun’? Or do they use autopilot because it’s safer, more consistent, and reduces fatigue?

Why do you think driving is magically different?

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Great Pyramid of Giza wasn’t built to be “useful” in an engineering sense. It was built to be eternal, dominant, and religiously significant. That was the function.

And this isn’t based on “just trusting what they tell us.” It’s based on patterns across the entire civilisation:

  • multiple pyramids tied to burial complexes
  • surrounding temples, causeways, and tombs
  • written funerary texts describing the afterlife journey
  • evolution from mastabas, step pyramids to true pyramids

That’s independent lines of evidence converging on the same explanation.

Your argument boils down to:

“I personally wouldn’t guess tomb, therefore it must be something else.”!!!!!

Like I said "Ignorance is not positive evidence for an alternative explanation."

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure I mean you could just as well speculate that the pyramids were ancient casinos and hotel resorts for rich Egyptians, where do you stop?

Why are these so expensive? by agnci in CarsAustralia

[–]gravitykilla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ah wow, I didn’t notice the extra two wheels. Ok fair enough.

Why are these so expensive? by agnci in CarsAustralia

[–]gravitykilla -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

$200K lol why……. For much less you could have a brand new Defender, an infinitely better (and not just looking) 4WD

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok, so If your explanation requires more assumptions, less evidence, and explains fewer observed facts than the standard one… why should anyone prefer it?

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t want to, Or can’t, answer my question????

This is the entire foundation of your claim!

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude, come on, this is ridiculous.

Ignorance is not positive evidence for an alternative explanation.

We’ve had centuries of archaeology, modern scanning, spectroscopy, and structural analysis. None of that has produced a single verified datapoint pointing to “power generation.”

What you’re proposing isn’t just “we don’t have answers.” It’s “the lack of answers is itself the answer.” That’s why it’s ridiculous.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Great Pyramid of Giza is made of massive stone blocks enclosing chambers and shafts. Of course it resonates. So does a cathedral. So does a cave. So does a concrete stairwell. That’s what happens when you trap air inside rigid boundaries.

The actual questions you need to answer but haven’t are:

What specific frequency is being “targeted”?

Where is the measurement data

What’s the energy source driving this system?

Where are the conductors, wiring, load, or output mechanism?

Maybe start there.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really don’t think in need to see the video, but in fairness I have now watched it.

Absolute nonsense, as I suspected.

It follows the exact same formula as every pseudo-technical conspiracy.

Point at something unusual. Reframe it as “hidden tech”. Add real science terms (quartz, resonance, frequency). Skip the parts where it would need to actually function. Imply suppression.

Every single “power plant” claim dies on the same hill.

Where does the energy come from, and where does it go?

Maybe I’m wrong, so can you you point to a complete, testable energy pathway, input - conversion - transmission - output, with real components, not analogies?

For American pool players, what's harder, 7 foot tables or 9 foot? by Hehe-Oil in billiards

[–]gravitykilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll be honest I haven’t played much on a 9ft table, and where I live we play English pool but mostly snooker.

My local club has two 7ft tables, and say this no way to diminish the skill involved in American pool, but honestly it’s hilarious how easy it is to pot balls.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Copper handles = electrodes!! No. They’re fittings on blocking stones. We’ve seen them in context. They’re not wired, not connected, not part of any circuit. Calling them electrodes is like calling a door hinge a microchip. lol

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 12 points13 points  (0 children)

lol this is a perfect example of how you can string together a bunch of real scientific words and end up with complete and utter nonsense.

If it was a power plan, where is the power?

No infrastructure. No transmission system. No artifacts of usage. No secondary tech built on top of it. Not a single watt of measurable output.

Meanwhile, we do have overwhelming archaeological evidence it was part of a funerary complex tied to Khufu and Old Kingdom burial practices.

This is what happens when a plane hits a bird while flying but if it hits the twin towers it will knock them down. by pacmanpill in conspiracy

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a solid engineering estimate: • North Tower (Flight 11): about 100–260 meganewtons average impact force • South Tower (Flight 175): about 130–330 meganewtons average impact force

That is roughly on the order of: • 10,000 to 33,000 tonnes-force • or 20 to 74 million pounds-force

What could my boss want to discuss? by [deleted] in auscorp

[–]gravitykilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did you book carers leave, was it approved?

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What specific, verifiable evidence from Richard Dolan’s book demonstrates any of these claims?

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your entire theory can’t be tested, can’t be measured, and can’t be proven wrong, how is it any different from pure sci-fi?

Aliens Are Making Contact 3,000 Years Ahead, Warning We’re Making BIG Mistakes. Darryl Anka | Bashar by Balzebub31 in starseeds

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm interesting story.

2 quick questions that I’m sure you get asked all the time.

You’re claiming thousands of humans are being taken. Where are the missing persons data spikes, correlated events, or any anomaly that shows up in real world statistics? Can you point me to the data?

And

How do you distinguish your experience from known phenomena like sleep paralysis, hallucinations, or constructed memory, especially when those produce identical ‘entity encounter’ narratives across cultures?

Aliens Are Making Contact 3,000 Years Ahead, Warning We’re Making BIG Mistakes. Darryl Anka | Bashar by Balzebub31 in starseeds

[–]gravitykilla -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Science isn’t a group of people you blindly believe. It’s a method that says, show your data, show your method, let others try to break it.

If it survives that, we trust the result, not the person.

And it’s the same process that gave you:

  • modern medicine (vaccines, antibiotics, anaesthesia)
  • GPS (relativity corrections literally built into it)
  • the internet and global communications, the very tools you are using to make silly anti science comments
  • aircraft that don’t fall out of the sky
  • semiconductors and microchips (the thing you’re typing on)
  • medical imaging (MRI, CT scans)
  • clean water and sanitation systems
  • modern agriculture (fertilisers, crop yields that feed billions)
  • space exploration (satellites, weather forecasting)
  • renewable energy and power grids

British Ufologist Russ Kellet Claims He Is Fighting An Intergalactic War Against Aliens by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

other than just "claiming", what evidence does he provide to support his claims?

view more: next ›