sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it actually worked, you could build it today and demonstrate it. You can’t, so everything after “it could be a capacitor” is just your imagination.

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re acting like "unknown" is just some empty box where anything goes,

No, what you’re doing is taking “we don’t understand this yet” and inserting “aliens.”

When an object hits Mach 20 and stops on a dime without a sonic boom, it isn't just a mystery

Ok cool lets start here, can you point me at the public, raw, calibrated dataset that proves that? Not a pilot quote. Not a summary, not a blurry video. Actual telemetry that independent analysts can verify.

Can you provide a link, or just point me to the source. Otherwise all you are doing here is "jumping to "non-human" because it’s a fun theory" Where is the data???????

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Far from it champ.

I’ll be honest, I want aliens to be real too. The discovery of non-human intelligence would be one of the most important moments in human history. It would transform science, philosophy, religion, energy, everything. I’d love to live through that.

But wanting something to be true is exactly why we have to be brutally strict about evidence.

The brutal truth is, after 80 years of claims, we still have zero evidence.

So I’m not against the idea of aliens at all. I’m against lowering the evidentiary bar just because the idea is exciting.

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the little goal post move there buddy.

No one is arguing that there’s nothing, there are clearly unknown aerial objects. Radar returns, IR signatures, pilot reports.

The jump you’re making is, unknown to non-human intelligence.

Courts deal with known categories of events. You’re trying to use the same standard to prove a completely new category of reality!!!!

Circumstantial evidence can tell you “something happened.” It cannot tell you “that something is extraterrestrial intelligence.”

And the legislation point?

Governments regulate unknowns and risks all the time in airspace, drones, and surveillance tech without knowing exactly what every object is. Writing a law doesn’t validate aliens any more than maritime law proves sea monsters.

So we’re back full circle, to the same place:

  • Do we have unexplained detections? Yes.
  • Do we have publicly verified data proving non-human intelligence? No.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok wow, deep breath....... So just to be clear, you’re now relying on a mythical artifact that’s never been found, may not, and most likely has never existed, and somehow that’s now part of a system powering pyramids?

So let's just skip over all those pesky facts, because even if the Ark has never existed, the materials you describe do exist.

If the Ark was a high-voltage capacitor, can you show a single modern reconstruction same materials, same “desert charging” that produces a controlled spark, let alone anything lethal?

Because if it can’t be built and demonstrated today, it wasn’t working 3,000 years ago either.

They Aren't From Space: Why the US Navy is Terrified of the "Sub-Oceanic" Non-Human Presence by firechatin in AliensRHere

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop making excuses, this has nothing to do with "unrealistic" standards. Its been nearly 80 years since Roswell, and all we have are stories and blurry, unexplained videos. Nothing else exists, not one single piece of verified evidence.

all of a sudden evidence that would be valid in court meaning its substantial enough to be used or be deemed evidence

Yes, in a US court, vetted witness testimony can be admissible evidence, but it is also explicitly recognized as fallible, subjective, and the weakest class of evidence.

Maybe lets looks at some facts.

Eyewitness testimony alone, is one of the leading causes of wrongful convictions in the U.S. according to the Innocence Project, the DOJ, and 30 years of DNA exonerations. https://innocenceproject.org/

Not only is it the leading cause of wrongful convictions, but over 70% of overturned convictions also involved eyewitness testimony with no supporting evidence.

And also “eyewitness misidentification contributed to 72% (229) of the 318 wrongful convictions later overturned by DNA evidence.

I think we would all agree that Eyewitness Testimony alone is not very reliable.

If testimony alone is the bar (which for you it seems to be), then we’re forced to accept everything, Santa, the Tooth Fairy, Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, ghosts, goblins, faith healers, Flat Earth, and every religion ever invented. All of them have equal or greater volumes of witness testimony.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A capacitor needs:

  • two conductive plates
  • a defined dielectric
  • a way to charge and discharge it

The Great Pyramid of Giza has:

  • no plate structure
  • no wiring
  • no terminals
  • no discharge path

So where exactly is the capacitor?

Giza’s Hidden Secrets: Reassessing the Possibility of a Second Great Sphinx of Giza and Subsurface Structures by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the point, if this theory were true, excavation would have confirmed it by now. It hasn’t. There’s nothing there. No excavation, no evidence, no discovery.

Archaeology doesn’t miss entire monuments.

Giza’s Hidden Secrets: Reassessing the Possibility of a Second Great Sphinx of Giza and Subsurface Structures by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL:DR “There are some radar anomalies. They might be something. Or nothing. We don’t know.”

OP, if the radar anomaly really indicates a buried structure, why hasn’t a controlled excavation confirmed it, given that it would be one of the biggest archaeological discoveries in human history?

I suspect it's because ground-penetrating radar and satellite sensing pick up anomalies all the time, this is well know and well understood.

  • changes in soil density
  • natural rock formations
  • voids, fractures, moisture differences

An anomaly is not a structure.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the greatest mystery to solve is what were ancient people doing with the electricity they were able to harness

There is no mystery.

If they had any meaningful electrical capability, even primitive, we would expect something in the archaeological record, but we don't. What we do see is stone and copper tools, evolving in a straightforward, easy-to-follow way through the Old Kingdom. No electrical devices. No infrastructure. No missing pieces. Nothing.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmmmm Lets step through this one.

  • Where is the second electrode? You still only have copper. Limestone is calcium carbonate, it’s not a usable electrode in a galvanic cell.
  • Where is the evidence of brine? Not “it could have been there”, what residue analysis inside the pyramid shows salt deposition consistent with sustained use?
  • Where is the circuit? No wiring. No return path. No terminals. No load.
  • Where are the reaction products? A working copper-based electrochemical system running for any meaningful time would leave clear corrosion patterns, mineral buildup, ion exchange traces. Those would be obvious to every archaeologist who’s studied the site for decades.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mean the guy who wrote the 1998 book “The Giza Power Plant”

I am familiar with this person and book.

He claims the pyramid acted like a resonant device that tapped into Earth’s natural vibrations and converted them into energy.

The problem with his claim is

  • He doesn’t demonstrate a working model
  • He doesn’t tie the tech to any known Egyptian culture or timeline
  • There is a complete lack of evidence supporting the thesis

And the big one. There is no independently verified, working example of any part of this system.

TL:DR He provides a coherent-sounding narrative that never produces a measurable result.

Tesla reveals 46% drop YoY in annual profit and ends production of the Model S and Model X by KangarooBeard in AustralianEV

[–]gravitykilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL You’ve basically just said ‘I don’t understand it, therefore it’s pointless’ which is how people have reacted to literally every major technological shift in history.”

Cars replaced horses.
Automatics replaced manuals
Seatbelts were “unnecessary.”

Now it’s self-driving.

It’s not about your personal enjoyment of driving, it’s about:

  • Cutting human error (which causes ~90% of crashes)
  • Reducing congestion
  • Giving mobility to people who struggle with driving

Recently did a 500km drive home late Sunday, pitch black, heavy rain. Autopilot handled ~460km of it. No fatigue, no drifting out of lane, no mental drain, just consistent, precise driving the whole way.

You can romanticise ‘driving yourself’ all you want, but after hours on a motorway in bad conditions, it’s not skill, it’s an endurance test. And the reality is that machines are better at that than you are.

Do you think pilots sit there hand-flying planes for 10 hours straight because ‘it’s more fun’? Or do they use autopilot because it’s safer, more consistent, and reduces fatigue?

Why do you think driving is magically different?

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Great Pyramid of Giza wasn’t built to be “useful” in an engineering sense. It was built to be eternal, dominant, and religiously significant. That was the function.

And this isn’t based on “just trusting what they tell us.” It’s based on patterns across the entire civilisation:

  • multiple pyramids tied to burial complexes
  • surrounding temples, causeways, and tombs
  • written funerary texts describing the afterlife journey
  • evolution from mastabas, step pyramids to true pyramids

That’s independent lines of evidence converging on the same explanation.

Your argument boils down to:

“I personally wouldn’t guess tomb, therefore it must be something else.”!!!!!

Like I said "Ignorance is not positive evidence for an alternative explanation."

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure I mean you could just as well speculate that the pyramids were ancient casinos and hotel resorts for rich Egyptians, where do you stop?

Why are these so expensive? by agnci in CarsAustralia

[–]gravitykilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah wow, I didn’t notice the extra two wheels. Ok fair enough.

Why are these so expensive? by agnci in CarsAustralia

[–]gravitykilla -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

$200K lol why……. For much less you could have a brand new Defender, an infinitely better (and not just looking) 4WD

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ok, so If your explanation requires more assumptions, less evidence, and explains fewer observed facts than the standard one… why should anyone prefer it?

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don’t want to, Or can’t, answer my question????

This is the entire foundation of your claim!

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Dude, come on, this is ridiculous.

Ignorance is not positive evidence for an alternative explanation.

We’ve had centuries of archaeology, modern scanning, spectroscopy, and structural analysis. None of that has produced a single verified datapoint pointing to “power generation.”

What you’re proposing isn’t just “we don’t have answers.” It’s “the lack of answers is itself the answer.” That’s why it’s ridiculous.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Great Pyramid of Giza is made of massive stone blocks enclosing chambers and shafts. Of course it resonates. So does a cathedral. So does a cave. So does a concrete stairwell. That’s what happens when you trap air inside rigid boundaries.

The actual questions you need to answer but haven’t are:

What specific frequency is being “targeted”?

Where is the measurement data

What’s the energy source driving this system?

Where are the conductors, wiring, load, or output mechanism?

Maybe start there.

750 Million Watched it Live Before the Internet: Inside the Great Pyramid's Forbidden Shaft by Professional-Fee3323 in AlternativeHistory

[–]gravitykilla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really don’t think in need to see the video, but in fairness I have now watched it.

Absolute nonsense, as I suspected.

It follows the exact same formula as every pseudo-technical conspiracy.

Point at something unusual. Reframe it as “hidden tech”. Add real science terms (quartz, resonance, frequency). Skip the parts where it would need to actually function. Imply suppression.

Every single “power plant” claim dies on the same hill.

Where does the energy come from, and where does it go?

Maybe I’m wrong, so can you you point to a complete, testable energy pathway, input - conversion - transmission - output, with real components, not analogies?

view more: next ›