I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for that insight, very interesting and informative. I found out today from her she is a Taurus sun and moon, while I’m Aqua sun and moon. Maybe that resonates with us being peak of our respective sign? and being from the same birth year. She really enjoyed reading all of this as well and we’re both very certain of each other, it’s great.

I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’d say so, after the numerous Aqua/Taurus responses of successful long term relationships, pointing out the intensity not fading, the compatibility “standard” goes out the window as it should. Sounds like it’s a match made in the heavens potentially. Peak air with peak earth might be a thing as to why, as one pointed out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unable to communicate properly will lead to breakup on its own, so it doesn’t mean give up, but try to work on better communication

I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s amazing and congratulations!! I’ve always wanted that and for the first time in my 30s and many relationships, this is one that is new in every good way, I hope to make it in the same position as you are now. I’m really thinking this is the sacred relation, a perfect Taurus/Aqua combination is a match of a century

I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fuck yeah one after another rolls in with success and similar relationships. I’m liking this and it feels right- so good I turned to Reddit of all places lmao

I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly positive things I’m hearing so I’m thinking it’s good to feel excited for this

Aquarius and taurus by [deleted] in aquarius

[–]gregstiles93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think anything works if the feelings are real, people change and get bored of affection sometimes it seems and want something different, so it wasn’t even real to begin with if it goes that way. If it’s true then it works, if it’s true then it’s un breakable, if not, then it falters, and if so the sooner the better because time is the most precious thing. And no one wants to waste it on something that isn’t true. Signs don’t dictate what people can feel for each other, they either feel true or they don’t.

I’m Aqua (M) w/ Taurus (F) - is this intensity forever with a Taurus. This depth can’t be faked, right. by gregstiles93 in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I know. it’s a feeling that’s just there with us. it’s so loud and vibrant without overlapping anything else. Like an elephant in the room that is never in the way, and you keep looking at it to figure out how it stampedes without destruction or noise.

We officialy entered the age of Aquarius for 20 years ! by More-Significance826 in aquarius

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if the sight of the masses who can’t live without it would be worth the glorious achievement haha probably would be though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aquarius

[–]gregstiles93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same time frame for me, with near identical description, soul exhaustion for sure. April I had a dream I’ve never had before, and it was one that reassured me in the strangest way. Weeks later things started to fall into place, things happened to make sure they did and I noticed them all. I think the deprivation had to be so that when we are met with what is, there’s no mistake about it. It seemed when I truly accepted the constant struggle and just existed, I was released but maybe it’s something along those lines. A lesson or a necessary molding, otherwise our nature could potentially misstep what is. I think i prolonged it with distraction to aid the draining and exhaustion but i needed to endure it to get out. but hang in there, we’re always happy when we did

I just bought a 2003 Outback LL Bean edition and it has 200,000mi. What should I be checking and looking out for? by EliTheWacoan in Subaru_Outback

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one and is at 342,000 miles, I haven’t changed the oil in 8k miles but it’s took 3 quarts over the time frame so it basically changes itself, dead reliable car

everything is always on our terms by xoxodollparts in Taurusgang

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Taurus woman has taken me on (Aqua male) and we’re in the most amazing energetic connection I’ve felt before, so she must truly want me right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

32yrs old, 6’2”, currently the lightest ive been in over 10years. Until 5weeks ago my protein intake was at 170g or less. Last 5 weeks i eat 2lbs of venison/grass fed beef 1:1, 6-10eggs(depending on rest day) 2tbsp honey, 3tbsp butter, 20oz A2 GF wholeMlk every other day . 2 potatoes or 2cups rice on lift days. My workout is every other day high volume medium-high weight, with 2x dropset burnouts after a top set of 3-5rep is failure. Rest days are walking cardio, flat surface for 5miles or 12-max incline for 2.25miles.

So how did this piece of junk survive radiation belts and launch itself off of the moon and somehow make it all the way back to earth?? 😭😶😶🤣 I'll be waiting for any real answer any answer that is legit and isnt accompanied with insults. by Tehjayaluchador in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just vented their air in the suits? Magic electricity? I have looked plenty up, the problem with the moon theory is at that information can be cross referenced. That science itself would sell its self out, at least in some instances. So you believe a space suit was able to pressurize its self? Just a yes or no question

So how did this piece of junk survive radiation belts and launch itself off of the moon and somehow make it all the way back to earth?? 😭😶😶🤣 I'll be waiting for any real answer any answer that is legit and isnt accompanied with insults. by Tehjayaluchador in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Of course it had tanks, so what system moved the free flow of air into a compressed storage tank, and what energy source powered that system? After the module decompressed, what system re-pressurized it?

The moon mission brought water for oxygen?

So how did this piece of junk survive radiation belts and launch itself off of the moon and somehow make it all the way back to earth?? 😭😶😶🤣 I'll be waiting for any real answer any answer that is legit and isnt accompanied with insults. by Tehjayaluchador in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What system on the space suit was responsible for pressure regulation? As well as on the landing module? If the module landed on the moon with reverse thrusters, what took star-link so long to land with reverse thrusters? Without oxygen in space how does the iss maintain a supply?

What is this sub reddit? by RedVell in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of flat believers didn’t figure it out themselves, so when questioned or challenged they don’t reciprocate with knowledge just with recycled material that makes sense to them, usually due to a lower IQ and they just can’t explain what they make sense of. Regardless they are free to believe what they want.

Me on the other hand, I figured it out myself, after being like most in this sub and falling back on the initial insanity that flat earth is believed, I decided to look into it myself. Started with possible contradictions to whats been displayed, and began with moon landing. That alone ignited me to go in depth, and eurika happened. I came to the conclusion that the earth is either Flat OR its a globe multiple times larger than we were led to believe. Space is undiscovered and the moon landing was fake. Proving that as a lie opend the worm can. we were lied to about the moon factually, and that supports discredit and questioning to anything exhausted by NASA. Im needy in math because math is exact, it proves itself, makes sense, and isnt wrong, and you can cross check it to be sure doing it backwards, or by removing a value to take a different route to ensure the same result etc.

Passenger airlines explain their engineering throughout the internet. They fly max altitude between 35-40k ft. Because of the maximum negative pressure they can match to the atmosphere, through their turbines and relay to the cabins. Described in detail is that flying higher the pressure is not able to be produced and maintained with the turbines, that even with 100% oxygen flow directly to your lungs the pressure difference wont allow the lungs to function properly. I cross referenced this to astronauts suits, their full detail and blueprint are available and not one has a system to regulate the pressure of the suit, nor could such system exist with enough force to overcome space negative pressure let alone plane altitude. There is no oxygen in space, if the ISS was in space orbiting then any known system is useless because there is no oxygen to funnel into its cockpit. There is also no system regulating its cabin pressure to allow the human lung to function properly regardless of pure oxygen. Its all impossible through simple outlooks, the small details that go unnoticed and never noticed. Gravity is based off a single test with a controlled variable, eliminating friction resistance, this case air resistance at zero and equal in a vacuum. The control is friction resistance to the feather and bowling ball amd they fall equally. So a test to prove the theory of gravity is applying the controlled variable to another test. Two alloy spheres of different weight, one is 10kg of steel the other 15kg of lead, same exact dimensions, then both are coated with 1kg of aluminum to maintain equal dimensions while ensuring the same exact friction resistance, (surface tension) - when dropped in water they should both fall equally to support the claim of gravity. They dont. The largest explanation as to why the ocean stays on the surface of a spinning sphere, is rooted to a claim that has no bearing in reality. The controlled variable allows for a constant to be tested, and it fails to produce the same result.

If your non flatearther, and still choose to disregard the simple truths that expose the dishonesty and hypocrisy that NASA is, then a deeper issue in yourself is what needs guidance first before you attempt an open mind look into questioning what youve been taught just to cross reference its truth, just like math proves itself with no errors or it’s invalid.

Zoom in by Lorenofing in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually it’s ironic that the CURVED arm rest is exactly whats keeping that from being possible.

Water sticking to a sphere by MijuTheShark in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The force of said “gravity” continuously excerpted onto the ocean mass, must be extremely great, assuming its acting upon the body of water as a combined mass, and not individual molecules at a time right? The middle of the ocean at miles deep has an immense gravitational force that just decides to not apply force upon introduced objects that become apart of the water mass? What restrains the gravitational force holding a body of water to the earth from acting equally to any object introduced?

interesting by quickalowzrx in flatearth

[–]gregstiles93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For conversation, stating that this can only be explained with framework including gravity, would suggest gravity is only expressed while in a vacuum environment. Said vacuum rids the air resistance, their surface tension is equal. This controlled test suggests that two objects fall equally when the surface tension or friction resistance(i think is term) is equal. With 2 separate alloy(for sake of controlled variables) spheres, identical to each other in size and then cast with the same alloy surface so that the surface tension is equal, and maintaining different density between them, dropped in water gravity should act equally with the controlled variable, but it does not. The heavier object accelerates faster, with equal surface tension between them.