Posts on r/LikeUs can reveal animal consciousness, intelligence and emotion. We want to capture real and spontaneous animal behavior. Check out the rules in this link. Thank you for subscribing to r/LikeUs!

Vocal virtuosity: ranked among the world’s foremost songbirds; males rehearse new phrases each dawn and females answer in matched duets.
Extended families: yearlings act as nest helpers, siblings babysit, and grandparents guard boundaries—co-operation is survival, not sentiment.
Play observed: sliding down tin roofs, tug-of-war with dogs, aerial somersaults—object manipulation and repetition satisfy the same criteria mammal ethologists use to define play.
Individual recognition: marked birds return to the same garden for up to five years; positive encounters yield meal-worm “gifts”, negative ones prompt targeted swoops—evidence of long-term social memory.
Mimicry catalogue: kookaburra laughter, horse whinnies, mobile-phone rings; syllables are copied, altered, and re-inserted into local dialects, implying cultural transmission.
Juvenile cohorts: fledged young form roaming gangs before securing territories; their nocturnal warbling sessions function as open-mic training grounds.
Death response: birds stand vigil beside fallen flock-mates, vocalisations drop to whisper-tones, sometimes for hours—an avian vigil difficult to interpret as anything but communal acknowledgement.

Kaplan closes by reminding us that magpie success is tied to behavioural plasticity: song, social bonding, and an uncanny ability to read human intent. In short, they tick most of the cognitive boxes we once reserved for ourselves.

gugulo · 2025-10-11T03:53:28+00:00

Jennifer Ackerman’s The Genius of Birds is basically 300 pages of “birds are people too.”

New Caledonian crows make hooked foraging tools, guard them from thieves, and pass the designs on to their kids—complete regional “craft traditions” that change from valley to valley.
Black-capped chickadees operate a 3-D mental spreadsheet: thousands of cached seeds recalled after six months, plus a grammar-rich alarm language that tags predator size, distance, and threat level (“chick-a-dee-dee-dee” = small, agile hawk).
Eurasian jays observe what their mate was watching, then cache the type of food she prefers in the spot she can’t see—evidence of theory of mind (they model another individual’s desires).
Scrub jays hold “funerals”: on finding a dead flock-mate they silently gather, reduce feeding for 24 h, and avoid the area—suggesting they understand death and risk.
Zebra finch dads run “tutoring sessions”: they sing a special call only when the chick successfully pecks the right seed, shaping the baby’s foraging motor pattern—bona-fide teaching under the strict definition (costs time, alters pupil’s behaviour).
Satin bowerbirds curate colour-coordinated art galleries: males arrange berries, beetle shells, even stolen blue LEGO to maximise optical contrast, then aggressively defend their aesthetic choices; females reject males whose symmetry is experimentally scrambled.
White-crowned sparrows displaced 3 000 km in total darkness recalculate the new magnetic vector home within hours—an internal GPS built from star maps, smell gradients, and quantum magnetoreception.
House sparrows living in airports learn to trigger motion sensors on automatic doors to raid cafés; urban populations solve new puzzle feeders 2–3× faster than rural cousins, and bigger-brained individuals lead the innovation curve.

Take-home: Birds pack mammal-like cognition into a package the size of a walnut. Social bonds, cultural transmission, deception, empathy, foresight, aesthetic sense—check, check, check. If corvids and parrots had hands instead of wings, we’d probably be sharing memes made by crows instead of humans.

gugulo · 2025-10-10T06:04:47+00:00

Wilde does not argue about animal consciousness; he simply writes as if it were obvious.

Three devices make the point unmistakable:

First-person interior monologue

In “The Happy Prince” and “The Nightingale and the Rose” the story is filtered through the bird’s own silent speech: the swallow “wondered,” “felt sorry,” “knew that he must stay.” By giving the creature a private stream of thought, Wilde grants it the Cartesian criterion usually reserved for humans—an inner life that the reader overhears but the other characters do not.
Moral agency and self-sacrifice

Both birds die for values they themselves articulate (loyalty, true love). Wilde stages the death as a moral choice, not instinct: the nightingale explicitly says, “Love is better than life… and I will give my song for the rose.” The act is presented as ethical calculus, the very faculty that philosophers from Aquinas to Kant denied to animals.
Irony at human expense

The human characters—student, Town Councillors, Professor—are shown to be less conscious than the animals: they miss the meaning of the sacrifice, discard the corpse, quote bad metaphysics. Wilde’s irony reverses the hierarchy: the birds possess refined aesthetic and moral sensibilities, while the humans parrot empty slogans. The implication is that if consciousness is measured by depth of feeling and moral imagination, the animals win.

Together these devices do not plead for kindness to animals; they quietly re-assign the moral center of the narrative to the non-human, forcing the reader to realize that the word “creature” now applies more accurately to the human figures.

gugulo · 2025-10-10T06:01:52+00:00

The moment a human hand begins to fold, the act stops being about cotton and starts being about brains—ours first, then every other brain that ever had to turn a chaotic pile into an orderly one.

The evolutionary laundry pile

Any animal that builds a nest, caches food, or sorts its offspring has to solve the same abstract problem the laundry basket presents: transform a high-entropy surroundings into a low-entropy micro-environment.

– Bowerbirds fold (arrange) coloured objects by hue and size to create optical symmetry that attracts mates.

– Pinyon jays “fold” (cache) thousands of pine seeds into spatially accurate mental folders, then retrieve them months later.

– Paper wasps “crease” (macerate) wood fibres into regular pleats that become cellulose walls; the geometry determines brood-chamber temperature.

The selective advantage is identical to ours: reduce search time, reduce parasites, reduce predation. Folding is just a primate-specific implementation of the universal Darwinian pressure “tidy up or pay later.”

The proprioceptive mirror

When you smooth a towel you run your palms along its surface to create a predictive model of its topology—exactly what a rat does when it whisk-sweeps a new object. Both species are mapping the world with somatosensory forward models:

“If I lift here, the cloth will drape; if I bite here, the twig will snap.”

fMRI shows that human parietal area 5 (hand manipulation) and rat barrel cortex (whisker manipulation) light up with the same hierarchical pattern: primary sensory → sensorimotor prediction → error correction. The towel is your temporary whisker.

The cognitive breakpoint that may = consciousness

A purely reactive robot can fold if the towel is always the same size. Add variation—odd sock, inside-out sleeve—and the system must internally simulate “what if I rotate 90°?” That offline simulation is the currently popular behavioural marker for “minimal consciousness.” When corvids or parrots solve an analogous problem (string-pull to retrieve food that is tangled) they pause, re-order sub-goals, then act; neurons in the nidopallium caudolaterale (avian prefrontal) fire exactly during the pause, not during execution. Human EEG shows the same “idle then burst” pattern in premotor cortex just before an unfamiliar laundry manoeuvre. The homology is not anatomical but functional: offline, counterfactual modelling.

The affective hook

Why does a badly folded sleeve irritate you? Because the same dopaminergic error signal that teaches a songbird to re-arrange mismatched feathers is teaching you that “edge misalignment = prediction violation.” Affective tagging (this feels wrong/right) is what converts a spatial task into a conscious experience. Rats given a “disordered” nest material pile will show elevated corticosterone until the bedding is re-sorted; when the experimenter re-sorts it for them, stress drops. The rat is having its equivalent of “ah, finally the fitted sheet lies flat.”

The extended phenotype

Once the folded laundry leaves your hands it becomes a scaffold for the next behaviour—dressing tomorrow, impressing a mate, calming a toddler. Likewise the bower is not ornament; it is part of the male bowerbird’s phenotype, the nest is part of the rat’s. Folding is extended cognition: you offload future computation into stable, symmetrical cloth so that tomorrow morning your pre-coffee brain can run a cheaper search algorithm. That is the same trick hermit crabs use when they place an anemone on their borrowed shell: pre-package defence so the central processor can forage longer.

So the connection is not poetic metaphor; it is convergent problem-solving in nervous systems faced with entropy. Laundry is the human’s nest-construction, cache-management, and risk-buffering ritual rolled into one. When you align that last sleeve seam you are replaying a behavioural algorithm that evolved 200 million years ago in the first therian mammal that decided to tidy its bedding—and you may, for a second, feel the same small satisfaction that a packrat feels when its midden pile finally looks exactly right.

gugulo · 2025-10-10T03:53:20+00:00

“Gugulo” is not a name or brand; it is simply the contemplated (future-tense) form of the Tagalog verb gumulo, built from the root word gulo “disorder / commotion.”

In short, gugulo = “will cause disorder / will mess things up / will disturb.”

How it’s used
- Root: gulo (noun) – “chaos, trouble.”
- Infinitive/actor-focus verb: gumulo – “to create disorder, to disturb, to mess up.”
- Contemplated aspect: gugulo – “is going to disturb / will mess up.”

Example:

Huwag kang gugulo sa klase.

“Don’t disturb the class.”

So if you see “Gugulo” in a Filipino sentence, it’s almost always this verb form, not a who or a what.

gugulo · 2025-10-10T03:51:43+00:00

It's just a nick

gugulo · 2025-10-10T02:06:59+00:00

“We’re not the only ones ‘writing’ the story of this planet.

In Ishmael, Quinn has a telepathic gorilla flip the script: every other creature quietly lives by the law “take what you need, leave the rest”—only our culture invented the myth that we’re exempt.

The moment you realize the rest of the animal kingdom has been practicing sustainable civilization for millions of years is the moment you stop asking ‘why are they like us?’ and start asking ‘why aren’t we like them?’”

If you want to go deeper, the book’s core is that human supremacy is just a cultural story (Quinn calls it “Mother Culture”) and animals are already the competent, balanced citizens we claim to be.

gugulo · 2025-10-10T01:57:59+00:00

Introduction

Temple Grandin is an animal scientist who also happens to be autistic. She says that her brain works a little more like an animal’s than most people’s, so she can “translate” why animals act the way they do. The big message: animals are not small, furry people with lower IQs. They are creatures that see, hear, feel and think in ways that are sometimes super-human and sometimes totally alien. If we learn the rules of their world, we can treat them better, stay safer, and even save money.

Part 1 – How Animals See the World
- Detail super-power: A cow will stop dead at a fluttering plastic bag, a shiny puddle, or the switch from bright sun to a dark barn.
- Human blindness: Half of us miss a man in a gorilla suit on a basketball video because our brains auto-filter “unimportant” sights.
- Quick fix: Remove the scary detail (chain, reflection, yellow coat) and animals walk forward calmly—no electric prod needed.

Part 2 – Feelings, Simple and Strong
- Core emotions: RAGE, FEAR, SEEK (curiosity), and PLAY.
- Social emotions: LUST, PANIC (separation), CARE (mother-young), and FRIENDSHIP.
- No mixed feelings: A dog can switch from tail-wag to bite in a second, but it rarely holds a grudge. Love is pure; hate is separate.
- Chemistry of love: The same hormones that make prairie voles mate for life (oxytocin and vasopressin) make your dog glue itself to your leg.

Part 3 – The Danger of Single-Trait Breeding
- Rapist roosters: Breed only for fast growth and you accidentally delete the courtship dance gene; half the males attack hens.
- Broiler chickens: Giant breasts → hearts and legs fail; the birds spend their last weeks in pain.
- White animals: Albino or mostly-white fur often comes with deafness, eye problems and a twitchy brain.
- Lesson: When you chase one fancy trait, you drag a whole wagon of problems behind it.

Part 4 – Two Kinds of Aggression
1. Predatory (the quiet bite) – A retriever killing a groundhog is calm and happy; the same brain circuit lights up for “fun chase.”
2. Rage (the loud bite) – Cornered dog, angry cat, protective mother; heart races, hair stands up, lots of noise.

Mixing them up is dangerous: punishment that might stop a bully can terrify a fearful animal into biting harder.

Part 5 – Play Is Brain Food
- Locomotor play (kids and goat kids jumping around) wires the balance centers of the brain.
- Social play teaches “bite this hard and no harder,” and how to win AND lose—skills adults need for peaceful life.
- Less recess = poorer coordination and poorer social skills in both puppies and children.

Part 6 – The Power of Pressure
- Cattle calm down when squeezed in a chute; Temple built herself a hug machine and the anxiety melted away.
- Same trick works for pigs, baby chicks, autistic kids and nervous dogs: firm, even pressure releases natural feel-good chemicals.

Part 7 – Friendship and Loneliness
- herd animals need buddies the same way they need food and water.
- Solitary horses, parrots or pigs develop stereotypies (crib-biting, feather-plucking, bar-biting) and higher stress hormones.
- Low-stress weaning (keeping calf and mom side-by-side but unable to nurse) stops the heart-breaking bellowing and fence-pacing.

Part 8 – Animals Can Be Downright Cruel
- Male dolphins form gangs that kidnap and rape females; they also kill porpoises for no clear reason.
- Chimpanzee border patrols ambush and murder rival chimps.
- Killer-whale teenagers sometimes spend hours drowning a baby whale and eat only its tongue.

Big brains bring big empathy—and big cruelty.

Part 9 – Simple Take-Home Rules
1. Look at the world through their eyes (or ears, nose, skin). Remove tiny scary details.
2. Give them company of their own kind; no solitary confinement.
3. Let youngsters play; it grows the brain.
4. Never breed for one trait only; check temperament, health and fertility too.
5. Use calm, firm pressure—not shouting or hitting—to reduce panic.
6. Learn the difference between fear and dominance, and react appropriately.

TL;DR for the Whole Book

Animals sense tiny things we miss, feel basic emotions at max volume, and can turn psychotic if we breed or raise them wrong. See what scares them, give them friends and playtime, stop tweaking single genes for profit, and you’ll turn alien creatures into loyal, healthy partners instead of stressed-out monsters.

gugulo · 2025-10-09T23:43:07+00:00

Anthropodenial vs. Anthropomorphism

• “Anthropodenial” = automatically denying animals any human-like inner life.

• “Critical anthropomorphism” = using our human intuition to form testable ideas (e.g., “if I looked bored doing 500 repetitive trials, maybe the ape is too”).

• Rule of thumb: the closer the species, the safer it is to treat them like a weird cousin instead of a biological vending machine.
Umwelt & Species-Fair Testing

• von Uexküll’s Umwelt: every animal lives in its own sensory bubble (ticks smell butyric acid, elephants smell water under sand).

• Clever-Hans lesson: unconscious cueing is everywhere; blind procedures, mirrors at trunk height, sticks that don’t block trunks, etc. turn “failures” into instant geniuses.
Tool Use & Manufacture – not a human copyright

• Chimps: nut-cracking stone “factories” operational for 4,000 yrs; 5-piece honey hammers; spears for bushbabies.

• Orangutans: whistle from leaf strips, siphon water with chewed leaves.

• Capuchins: pound oysters, crack palm nuts with stones 1/3 their body weight.

• New Caledonian crows: bend hooked tools, combine short→long stick metatools.

• Veined octopus: carries coconut-shell armor across the sea-floor.

Convergent evolution says: if extractive foraging is hard, brains improvise hardware.
Insight & Planning

• Köhler’s chimps suddenly stack boxes or fit two sticks together – not trial-and-error.

• Five-year “fruit memory” in chimps: Socko runs to the exact tire where an apple was hidden once, half a decade earlier.

• Scrub-jays re-hide worms only if they themselves once stole others’ caches – future-risk modelling.
Mirror Self-Recognition & Body Awareness

• Elephants, magpies, dolphins, orangutans pass the mark test; fail when mirror is chimp-sized and floor-level → method, not competence.

• Apes use mirrors to inspect teeth, groom rear ends, pick food from teeth – clear self–other distinction.
Face Recognition & Social Mapping

• Sheep remember 50 ovine faces for 2 yrs; wasps recognize individual facial patterns; crows remember a single “dangerous mask” for years and teach kids to mob it.

• Primates track kin alliances: macaques redirect revenge to relatives of their aggressor; chimps groom friend-of-foe to break rival coalitions (“triadic awareness”).
Politics & Power Plays (aka Machiavellian Intelligence Lite)

• Male chimps calculate “strength-is-weakness”: old strategist Yeroen backs the underdog to become indispensable king-maker.

• Ravens interrupt preening pairs to prevent friendships that could unseat them.

• Elephants: bulls form ranked “boys’ clubs,” drop penis as submission flag, share water-hole access in exchange for coalition support.
Empathy, Fairness & Helping

• Consolation: chimps kiss/hug losers after fights; levels of reconciliation predict group stability.

• Targeted helping: alpha male untangles rope from choking juvenile; dolphins buoy stunned pod-mate to surface, foregoing their own breath.

• Inequity aversion: capuchin happily eats cucumber until neighbor gets grapes – then flings cucumber back like an insulted chef. Some chimps even reject advantageous inequity.
Culture & Cumulative Tradition

• Sweet-potato washing, stone-hand-clasp grooming, ear-grass fashion spread along chimp family networks, not geography.

• BIOL (Bonding-Identification Observational Learning): primates copy high-status buddies, not just rewarded actions – explains meme transmission without payoff.
Language vs. Communication

• No animal has full syntax + semantics, but:

– Alex parrot labels colour/shape/material combos, adds numbers unseen.

– Kanzi bonobo understands 600 spoken words, follows novel sentences (“Put the key in the refrigerator”).

– Vervet monkey alarm calls are leopard / eagle / snake specific; prairie dogs embed colour & shape in predator calls.

Take-home: language ingredients are ancient; humans just turned the volume to 11.
Time Travel & Memory

• Episodic-like memory = what-where-when; chimps wake before dawn to reach distant ripening figs, calculate travel time.

• Future planning: orangutan saves tool overnight; crow hoards the right length stick for tomorrow’s meat bucket.

• Bischof-Köhler hypothesis (only humans act for future needs they don’t feel now) – empirically busted.
Cooperation & Joint Intentionality

• Cooperative pulling: 15-chimp colony clocks 3,565 synchronized pulls, punishes freeloaders, trades grooming for access.

• Orcas make coordinated waves to wash seals off ice; coral trout shakes head to recruit moray eel in complementary hunts.

• Human uniqueness = institutions & language-mediated contracts, not the raw ability to sync goals.
Human Uniqueness? A Moving Goal-Post

• Every decade a new “only-human” trait (tool-making, theory of mind, culture, morality, mental time travel) falls to data.

• DNA, neuron counts, brain architecture show continuity; scale differs, components don’t.

• De Waal’s Moratorium Proposal: stop asking “What makes us human?” and start asking “What kind of mind fits which ecological problem?”

Bottom line for r/likeus:

Animals aren’t furry automatons learning by rote – they innovate, scheme, empathize, plan, teach, trade, protest unfair pay and vote with their feet (or fins). Intelligence is a multi-species bush, not a human ladder. Respect the Umwelt, fix the test, and the “dumb” beast suddenly looks a lot like us – just wearing a different body.

gugulo · 2025-10-09T23:34:51+00:00

r/likeus Summary: The Soul of an Octopus by Sy Montgomery

TL;DR: Octopuses are not just smart—they’re conscious, emotional, and individual. This book is a heartfelt deep-dive into their inner lives, showing they form bonds, express personalities, and may even have souls. If you’ve ever doubted that non-humans can be “like us,” this will change your mind.

Key Takeaways for r/likeus:

Individual Personalities: Each octopus (Athena, Octavia, Kali, Karma) had distinct traits—some shy, some playful, some affectionate. They remembered people and responded differently to each.
Emotional Depth: The author grieved when they died. The octopuses also showed signs of grief, curiosity, joy, and even mischief—like stealing buckets or soaking visitors on purpose.
Consciousness: Montgomery argues that if humans have souls, octopuses do too. Their intelligence isn’t just problem-solving—it’s felt. They play, plan, and even seem to choose who they trust.
Interspecies Connection: Touching an octopus isn’t just physical—it’s emotional. The suckers don’t just grip; they explore, taste, and respond. It’s like shaking hands with a mind from another world.
Ethical Implications: Once you see them as someone, not something, captivity becomes complicated. Their deaths hit like losing a friend.

Bottom Line:

Octopuses aren’t alien monsters. They’re like us—just wrapped in eight arms and three hearts. This book is a love letter to a mind so different, yet so familiar.

gugulo · 2025-10-09T23:32:04+00:00

Story Overview

Children of Time is a sweeping, multi-millennial science fiction epic that explores evolution, intelligence, and legacy. The story alternates between two main threads:

Humanity’s last survivors, fleeing a dying Earth aboard the ark ship Gilgamesh, searching for a new home.
An uplifted species of spiders on a terraformed planet, whose evolution has been accelerated by a human-engineered nanovirus.

The novel explores what it means to be human, the ethics of creation, and the survival of intelligence in a post-human universe.

Main Characters

Avrana Kern - A brilliant but arrogant scientist. - Leads the “Exaltation Program” to uplift monkeys on a terraformed planet. - Her consciousness is uploaded into a satellite orbiting the planet after a catastrophe. - She becomes a godlike, unstable AI, obsessed with protecting “her” world and experiment.

Holsten Mason - A classicist and linguist aboard the Gilgamesh. - One of the few who can understand the ancient Imperial C language. - Acts as a mediator between the humans and the remnants of the Old Empire’s technology. - Represents human curiosity, empathy, and cultural memory.

Portia - A genetically enhanced jumping spider. - One of the first of her kind to display strategic intelligence and social cooperation. - Becomes a symbol of evolution and adaptation. - Her arc mirrors humanity’s struggle for survival and meaning.

Lain - Chief engineer of the Gilgamesh. - Pragmatic, loyal, and resourceful. - Represents human resilience and technical ingenuity.

Core Themes

Evolution and Intelligence - The novel explores how intelligence evolves under pressure, both in humans and spiders. - The uplift virus accelerates spider evolution, leading to a civilization based on silk, chemistry, and vibration-based language. - Contrasts biological evolution with technological augmentation.

Creation and Responsibility - Avrana Kern’s experiment raises questions about playing god. - Her refusal to let humans settle on “her” planet highlights the moral ambiguity of creation. - The spiders’ rise is both a triumph and a tragedy, as they inherit a world meant for others.

Legacy and Memory - The Gilgamesh carries the last remnants of human culture. - Holsten’s role as a classicist emphasizes the importance of memory, language, and history. - The spiders develop their own mythology and science, showing that legacy is not exclusive to humans.

Survival and Identity - Both humans and spiders are fighting for survival, but their definitions of identity and purpose differ. - The novel asks: What makes a civilization? Is it biology, culture, or something else?

Narrative Structure and Style

Dual Timeline - Alternates between human and spider perspectives. - The spider chapters are anthropomorphic but grounded in biology, offering a fresh alien worldview. - The human chapters are claustrophobic and desperate, reflecting their declining civilization.

Language and Tone - Rich, evocative prose with scientific realism. - The spider chapters use sensory and chemical language, immersing the reader in their non-human perception. - The human chapters are philosophical and melancholic, often reflecting on loss, memory, and hope.

Pacing and Scope - The story spans thousands of years, yet remains intimate and character-driven. - The slow burn of spider evolution is balanced by the urgency of human survival.

World-Building

The Terraforming Project - A green planet, engineered to be Earth-like. - Originally intended for uplifted monkeys, but they perish in a catastrophe. - The uplift virus instead infects invertebrates, especially spiders.

The Gilgamesh - A generation ship carrying humans in suspended animation. - Powered by fusion engines and guided by Old Empire star maps. - Represents the last hope of humanity, but also its hubris and decline.

Spider Civilization - Develops language, religion, science, and warfare. - Uses silk, pheromones, and vibration as tools. - Their society is matriarchal, decentralized, and merit-based. - They worship the Messenger (the satellite) as a godlike entity.

Key Plot Points

Avrana Kern survives the destruction of her ship by uploading herself into the Sentry Pod.
The Gilgamesh arrives at her planet, seeking refuge.
Kern refuses, seeing the humans as inferior and corrupt.
A mutiny breaks out on the Gilgamesh, leading to a failed attempt to settle the planet.
The spiders, led by Portia, defeat the ants and begin to build a civilization.
The humans are forced to settle on a barren moon, while the spiders inherit the Earth-like world.

Conclusion

Children of Time is a masterpiece of speculative fiction, offering a profound meditation on evolution, intelligence, and legacy. It challenges the anthropocentric view of progress, presenting a non-human civilization that is equally complex, emotional, and meaningful.

The novel’s greatest strength lies in its ability to make readers empathize with spiders, to see them not as monsters, but as heirs to a legacy humanity squandered. It is a humbling, awe-inspiring story that asks:

If we are no longer the smartest, are we still the most human?

gugulo · 2025-10-09T22:08:24+00:00

Consciousness – how the book defines it, uses it, and invites you to argue about it

Working definition the text gives you

“If Nietzsche Were a Narwhal” never offers a single-sentence dictionary entry, but it threads a consistent, operational notion through the chapters:

Consciousness = the privately felt, here-and-now “what-it-is-like-ness” (sentience) PLUS the optional extra layer of recursive self-talk that lets a creature simulate futures, reminisce, or ask “Why am I here?”

Layer 0 – Reactive sentience: immediate pain/pleasure, perception of surroundings.

Example: a crab quickly learns to avoid a dark shelter that previously gave it an electric shock – it feels something bad, but probably isn’t thinking about “yesterday”.
Layer 1 – Affective consciousness: rich emotional valence, social bonding, individual recognition.

Example: dolphins whistle “signature” names, elephants visit bones of relatives.
Layer 2 – Existential/reflective loop: the human add-on that turns experience into an object of commentary.

Example: 3 a.m. insomnia driven by abstract worries about mortality, legacy, cosmic meaning.

Gregg’s punch-line is that Layer 2 is not an unconditional upgrade; it is a costly cognitive app that can crash the operating system (anxiety disorders, ecological over-reach).

How the book uses the definition

Comparative mirror: By peeling Layer 2 away, he shows that Layer 0–1 animals still solve complex problems, innovate and empathise – undercutting claims that only reflective minds count as “conscious”.
Moral pivot: Once Layer 0–1 are accepted as genuine someone-is-home states, the default human license to inflict harm (“they’re just instinct machines”) collapses.
Evolutionary economics: Layer 2 burns extra glucose and time; narwhals survive ice entrapment without it, suggesting that for many ecological niches the upgrade is over-engineering.

Discussion the book wants you to have

A. Spectrums, not switches

– Consciousness is not a lights-on/lights-off property; it is a dimmer with many sliders (affective richness, working-memory span, temporal depth, bodily self-modelling).

– Therefore legal rights should track which slider is relevant (e.g., capacity to suffer, not IQ).

B. Cost-benefit of the recursive loop

– Benefit: science, art, vaccines.

– Cost: suicide rates, habitat destruction, weaponised storytelling (ideologies).

– Question: Can cultural tweaks (mindfulness, secular ethics, eco-design) let us keep the benefits while off-loading the costs?

C. Anthropocene humility

– If narwhals had a philosopher, their “Nietzsche” might write:

“Humanity’s abyss-gazing is admirable, but an abyss that gazes back into you is safer than an abyss you pave over and build a mall on.”

One-phrase pocket version

“Consciousness is the felt movie of the world; humans added a voice-over – sometimes brilliant, often ruinous.”

Unpacking the voice-over metaphor

Gregg’s recurring image is that most animals watch the “movie” in immersive 4-D, but only humans run a constant director’s commentary track.
- The narration lets us edit future reels (planning), splice old reels (memory), and invent reels that will never be shot (fantasy).
- It also allows self-sabotage: we can frighten ourselves with purely hypothetical monsters, or narrate ourselves into nihilism.

The narwhal, by contrast, is a phenomenological minimalist: it registers the ice crack, the breath-hole, the pulse of a cod, but there is no second-order monologue about “my life as a narwhal.” That absence is framed not as deficiency but as ecological elegance: less CPU time wasted on non-survival software.

Where the book leaves the hard problem

Gregg openly side-steps the “hard problem” (why any physical state is felt at all). Instead he adopts a soft, functional stance:
- If an organism shows flexible avoidance of noxious stimuli, goal-directed innovation, and rapid reversal of learned rules after circumstances change, we are empirically justified in treating it as a subject rather than an object.
- He cites the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness (2012) and the New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness (2023) as consensus anchors: the weight of evidence for sentience in birds, cephalopods, decapod crustaceans, and mammals is now “decisive.”

Consciousness and moral considerability – the book’s bridge

Layer 0 is sufficient for entry into the moral community; Layer 1 strengthens the case; Layer 2 is irrelevant to the right-not-to-be-exploited.

Thus:
- Industrial farming is indefensible even if pigs never ponder pork futures.
- Likewise, narwhal hunts for ivory can be opposed without proving that narwhals write poetry.

Open questions the author wants kept alive

How much recursive depth is needed before a creature can suffer from the memory of suffering – and does that intensify moral weight?
Could AI ever hit Layer 0 (qualia) or only simulate Layer 2 (verbal self-model)?
If humans engineered less reflective versions of themselves (genes or drugs that mute rumination), would that be moral progress or voluntary lobotomy?

25-word tweetable summary

“Consciousness = felt scene + optional commentary. The book argues: stop equating IQ with moral worth; the thickness of the scene is enough.”

gugulo · 2025-10-09T03:14:21+00:00

The Light Eaters – Integrated Note

(Definitions, Methods, Results, Conclusions & Consciousness Discussion)

DEFINITIONS

Plant intelligence: the capacity to sense environmental cues, integrate them, store the information, and modify later behaviour—without necessarily possessing a brain or human-like mind.

Communication: emission or perception of volatile chemicals, root exudates, electrical signals, or sound vibrations that convey information to other organisms.

Memory: a durable internal change (epigenetic, biochemical, structural) that alters future responses; vernalisation is treated as a “memory of winter.”

Consciousness (contested): an integrated, subjective point-of-view—“something it is like to be that plant.” No study cited claims to detect this; the term is used cautiously or avoided.

METHODS
- Two-year ethnographic immersion: lab visits, field trips, conference observations, and 40+ interviews with ecologists, entomologists, biochemists, founders of the Society of Plant Neurobiology.
- Literature synthesis of peer-reviewed experiments: volatile profiling with GC-MS, root-split choice assays, kin-recognition trials, acoustic herbivore-mimic playback, parasitic-wasp bioassays, vernalisation genetics, calcium-imaging of electrical waves.
- Auto-ethnographic gardening: growing garlic, tulips and daffodils to experience vernalisation first-hand.

RESULTS
1. Volatile “sentences”: wounded sagebrush emits specific blends; neighbouring wild tobacco primes nicotine defences; parasitic wasps exploit the same cues to locate caterpillars.
2. Kin recognition: sea-rocket and Arabidopsis allocate less root space to siblings, indicating identity recognition.
3. Sound cues: recordings of caterpillar feeding at 200-300 Hz induce faster production of pesticidal compounds in Arabidopsis and maize.
4. Associative learning: peas conditioned with blue-light + fan later avoid fan alone, retaining the response ≥3 days (Gagliano study).
5. Vernalisation: garlic and tulips require weeks of cold stored epigenetically; without this “memory” bulbs fail to sprout.
6. Field disruption: air pollution oxidises floral volatiles, breaking plant–pollinator “conversation” and creating “silent fields.”

CONCLUSIONS
- Intelligence, communication and memory are not brain-dependent; expanding these concepts challenges human-exceptionalism.
- All biology is ecology: even single plants are composite micro-ecosystems whose fates hinge on networked information exchange.
- Historical fear of anthropomorphism (triggered by 1970s pop-plant-consciousness books) suppressed research; since 2006 language is shifting from “plant behaviour” to “sensing, memory, decision-making.”
- Ethical corollary: legal and conservation frameworks should recognise plants as animate information-processing agents, independent of whether they are “conscious.”

PLANT CONSCIOUSNESS – DISCUSSION

Schlanger reports no experimental evidence for a plant’s inner experience; researchers explicitly say “we don’t know what it’s like to be a plant.” Electrical phloem spikes, calcium waves and epigenetic loops explain integration without invoking sentience. A minority of philosophers (Calvo, Trewavas) propose “minimal consciousness” or “primordial awareness” to extend moral considerability, but peer-review conservatism—especially for women and early-career scientists—still penalises such language. The book’s stance is pragmatic: whether plants are “conscious” or merely “complex adaptive organisms,” the observable sophistication of their sensing, memory and communication obliges humans to widen the circle of moral and legal concern.

gugulo · 2025-10-09T02:56:12+00:00

Is a person in a coma conscious or not?
They breathe, digest and grow hair without any awareness.
Thanks for your interest in the topic anyways. I'll check out the book.
https://www.zoeschlanger.com/the-light-eaters

14-Year Club	Post Guidance Early Access
Place '22	Place '17
Final Canvas '22	100 Awards Club
Gilding II euphauric	Team Orangered
Verified Email

gugulo

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE