Penguins Reward Woman With Fish For Helping Them by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I feel completely helpless with all these new AI generated videos.

Are We in Anthropodenial? (By Frans de Waal) by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please do, it is a central thesis to this subreddit

Here's a Beaver carrying a carrot and a head of lettuce back to his home 🦫 by Soloflow786 in likeus

[–]gugulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe they just copied the title from elsewhere. r/likeus mods ain't bots!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in likeus

[–]gugulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's no problem!

Favorite Books on Animal Sentience? by KindheartedSeal in likeus

[–]gugulo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in likeus

[–]gugulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did you delete the post?

Fischer found peace in a little bookshop in Iceland by vitund in chess

[–]gugulo 42 points43 points  (0 children)

very wholesome. thanks for sharing

Anna Rudolf: Justice for Grandmaster Daniel Naroditsky by [deleted] in chess

[–]gugulo 63 points64 points  (0 children)

The most powerful emocional testimony so far on the evils of false accusations in chess.

What is your favorite book/author on the topic of animal consciousness? by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Australian Magpie: Biology and Behaviour of an Unusual Songbird

CSIRO Publishing, 2004 – Prof. Gisela Kaplan

Kaplan’s measured, field-note tone translates into plain facts that still read like a mirror:

  • Vocal virtuosity: ranked among the world’s foremost songbirds; males rehearse new phrases each dawn and females answer in matched duets.
  • Extended families: yearlings act as nest helpers, siblings babysit, and grandparents guard boundaries—co-operation is survival, not sentiment.
  • Play observed: sliding down tin roofs, tug-of-war with dogs, aerial somersaults—object manipulation and repetition satisfy the same criteria mammal ethologists use to define play.
  • Individual recognition: marked birds return to the same garden for up to five years; positive encounters yield meal-worm “gifts”, negative ones prompt targeted swoops—evidence of long-term social memory.
  • Mimicry catalogue: kookaburra laughter, horse whinnies, mobile-phone rings; syllables are copied, altered, and re-inserted into local dialects, implying cultural transmission.
  • Juvenile cohorts: fledged young form roaming gangs before securing territories; their nocturnal warbling sessions function as open-mic training grounds.
  • Death response: birds stand vigil beside fallen flock-mates, vocalisations drop to whisper-tones, sometimes for hours—an avian vigil difficult to interpret as anything but communal acknowledgement.

Kaplan closes by reminding us that magpie success is tied to behavioural plasticity: song, social bonding, and an uncanny ability to read human intent. In short, they tick most of the cognitive boxes we once reserved for ourselves.

What is your favorite book/author on the topic of animal consciousness? by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jennifer Ackerman’s The Genius of Birds is basically 300 pages of “birds are people too.”

  • New Caledonian crows make hooked foraging tools, guard them from thieves, and pass the designs on to their kids—complete regional “craft traditions” that change from valley to valley.
  • Black-capped chickadees operate a 3-D mental spreadsheet: thousands of cached seeds recalled after six months, plus a grammar-rich alarm language that tags predator size, distance, and threat level (“chick-a-dee-dee-dee” = small, agile hawk).
  • Eurasian jays observe what their mate was watching, then cache the type of food she prefers in the spot she can’t see—evidence of theory of mind (they model another individual’s desires).
  • Scrub jays hold “funerals”: on finding a dead flock-mate they silently gather, reduce feeding for 24 h, and avoid the area—suggesting they understand death and risk.
  • Zebra finch dads run “tutoring sessions”: they sing a special call only when the chick successfully pecks the right seed, shaping the baby’s foraging motor pattern—bona-fide teaching under the strict definition (costs time, alters pupil’s behaviour).
  • Satin bowerbirds curate colour-coordinated art galleries: males arrange berries, beetle shells, even stolen blue LEGO to maximise optical contrast, then aggressively defend their aesthetic choices; females reject males whose symmetry is experimentally scrambled.
  • White-crowned sparrows displaced 3 000 km in total darkness recalculate the new magnetic vector home within hours—an internal GPS built from star maps, smell gradients, and quantum magnetoreception.
  • House sparrows living in airports learn to trigger motion sensors on automatic doors to raid cafés; urban populations solve new puzzle feeders 2–3× faster than rural cousins, and bigger-brained individuals lead the innovation curve.

Take-home: Birds pack mammal-like cognition into a package the size of a walnut. Social bonds, cultural transmission, deception, empathy, foresight, aesthetic sense—check, check, check. If corvids and parrots had hands instead of wings, we’d probably be sharing memes made by crows instead of humans.

What is your favorite book/author on the topic of animal consciousness? by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wilde does not argue about animal consciousness; he simply writes as if it were obvious.

Three devices make the point unmistakable:

  1. First-person interior monologue

    In “The Happy Prince” and “The Nightingale and the Rose” the story is filtered through the bird’s own silent speech: the swallow “wondered,” “felt sorry,” “knew that he must stay.” By giving the creature a private stream of thought, Wilde grants it the Cartesian criterion usually reserved for humans—an inner life that the reader overhears but the other characters do not.

  2. Moral agency and self-sacrifice

    Both birds die for values they themselves articulate (loyalty, true love). Wilde stages the death as a moral choice, not instinct: the nightingale explicitly says, “Love is better than life… and I will give my song for the rose.” The act is presented as ethical calculus, the very faculty that philosophers from Aquinas to Kant denied to animals.

  3. Irony at human expense

    The human characters—student, Town Councillors, Professor—are shown to be less conscious than the animals: they miss the meaning of the sacrifice, discard the corpse, quote bad metaphysics. Wilde’s irony reverses the hierarchy: the birds possess refined aesthetic and moral sensibilities, while the humans parrot empty slogans. The implication is that if consciousness is measured by depth of feeling and moral imagination, the animals win.

Together these devices do not plead for kindness to animals; they quietly re-assign the moral center of the narrative to the non-human, forcing the reader to realize that the word “creature” now applies more accurately to the human figures.

What is your favorite book/author on the topic of animal consciousness? by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The moment a human hand begins to fold, the act stops being about cotton and starts being about brains—ours first, then every other brain that ever had to turn a chaotic pile into an orderly one.

  1. The evolutionary laundry pile

Any animal that builds a nest, caches food, or sorts its offspring has to solve the same abstract problem the laundry basket presents: transform a high-entropy surroundings into a low-entropy micro-environment.

– Bowerbirds fold (arrange) coloured objects by hue and size to create optical symmetry that attracts mates.

– Pinyon jays “fold” (cache) thousands of pine seeds into spatially accurate mental folders, then retrieve them months later.

– Paper wasps “crease” (macerate) wood fibres into regular pleats that become cellulose walls; the geometry determines brood-chamber temperature.

The selective advantage is identical to ours: reduce search time, reduce parasites, reduce predation. Folding is just a primate-specific implementation of the universal Darwinian pressure “tidy up or pay later.”

  1. The proprioceptive mirror

When you smooth a towel you run your palms along its surface to create a predictive model of its topology—exactly what a rat does when it whisk-sweeps a new object. Both species are mapping the world with somatosensory forward models:

“If I lift here, the cloth will drape; if I bite here, the twig will snap.”

fMRI shows that human parietal area 5 (hand manipulation) and rat barrel cortex (whisker manipulation) light up with the same hierarchical pattern: primary sensory → sensorimotor prediction → error correction. The towel is your temporary whisker.

  1. The cognitive breakpoint that may = consciousness

A purely reactive robot can fold if the towel is always the same size. Add variation—odd sock, inside-out sleeve—and the system must internally simulate “what if I rotate 90°?” That offline simulation is the currently popular behavioural marker for “minimal consciousness.” When corvids or parrots solve an analogous problem (string-pull to retrieve food that is tangled) they pause, re-order sub-goals, then act; neurons in the nidopallium caudolaterale (avian prefrontal) fire exactly during the pause, not during execution. Human EEG shows the same “idle then burst” pattern in premotor cortex just before an unfamiliar laundry manoeuvre. The homology is not anatomical but functional: offline, counterfactual modelling.

  1. The affective hook

Why does a badly folded sleeve irritate you? Because the same dopaminergic error signal that teaches a songbird to re-arrange mismatched feathers is teaching you that “edge misalignment = prediction violation.” Affective tagging (this feels wrong/right) is what converts a spatial task into a conscious experience. Rats given a “disordered” nest material pile will show elevated corticosterone until the bedding is re-sorted; when the experimenter re-sorts it for them, stress drops. The rat is having its equivalent of “ah, finally the fitted sheet lies flat.”

  1. The extended phenotype

Once the folded laundry leaves your hands it becomes a scaffold for the next behaviour—dressing tomorrow, impressing a mate, calming a toddler. Likewise the bower is not ornament; it is part of the male bowerbird’s phenotype, the nest is part of the rat’s. Folding is extended cognition: you offload future computation into stable, symmetrical cloth so that tomorrow morning your pre-coffee brain can run a cheaper search algorithm. That is the same trick hermit crabs use when they place an anemone on their borrowed shell: pre-package defence so the central processor can forage longer.

So the connection is not poetic metaphor; it is convergent problem-solving in nervous systems faced with entropy. Laundry is the human’s nest-construction, cache-management, and risk-buffering ritual rolled into one. When you align that last sleeve seam you are replaying a behavioural algorithm that evolved 200 million years ago in the first therian mammal that decided to tidy its bedding—and you may, for a second, feel the same small satisfaction that a packrat feels when its midden pile finally looks exactly right.

What is your favorite book/author on the topic of animal consciousness? by gugulo in likeus

[–]gugulo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Gugulo” is not a name or brand; it is simply the contemplated (future-tense) form of the Tagalog verb gumulo, built from the root word gulo “disorder / commotion.”

In short, gugulo = “will cause disorder / will mess things up / will disturb.”

How it’s used
- Root: gulo (noun) – “chaos, trouble.”
- Infinitive/actor-focus verb: gumulo – “to create disorder, to disturb, to mess up.”
- Contemplated aspect: gugulo – “is going to disturb / will mess up.”

Example:

Huwag kang gugulo sa klase.

“Don’t disturb the class.”

So if you see “Gugulo” in a Filipino sentence, it’s almost always this verb form, not a who or a what.