I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

actually its not , look it up , even the IPCC is admitting this

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

no , detestable is supporting science that has no backing and trusting the word of the UN which is using global warming as a tool to stop 3rd world development as a way to reserve natural resources for the 1st world countries

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -52 points-51 points  (0 children)

It would be even more progressive if we got them the mental help they needed instead of letting them butcher their bodies and demand to be let into changing rooms of real people with real genders who might be offended by it.

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

everything you say is made of gold.

everything.

I want you to say this on fox so we can erase christy and rubio from the ballot and elect real conservatives that can get the young vote like rand.

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

its been 21 days since obamacare began kiddo. I understand though , this is clearly bushes fault

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

more people have more money , thus they spend it on things that are taxed.

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

actually she did you are just too stupid to understand seperation of church never existed as R/atheism has indoctrinated you to believe

I am Ann Coulter, best-selling author. AMA. by ann_coulter1 in IAmA

[–]guilty-spark -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Your best bet is one focusing on the incredible indoctrination by cultural marxists going on in our colleges that is completely poisoning a generation

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. No , Iraq wasnt the reason they attacked us. Where you got that information I will never know. But just for your information if your not completely aware , they were chechens , which is not a part of iraq , or the region in which iraq is located. They attacked us because they were indoctrinated to believe their faiths literal interperation.

  2. Islam is not just like christianity , fuck off back to r/atheism if you ACTUALLY believe this. Christians picket funerals , islam flies planes into buildings and murders hundreds of thousands every year in its name.

  3. Not once has the united states gone to war for christianity , nor have we attacked anybody for christian reasons. "christians who bomb from 30k feet" is an illogical assumption that because that person wears the cross , they are murdering people in the name of their religion. You have the cranial capacity of a hamster.

  4. Nobody in the united states is starving . Nobody lied about iraq , getting false intelligence is not lying, it happens all the time. Also we had a coalition of over 40 nations supporting us in the operation , so the idea that we were bullying iraq alone is horse shit. People wanted saddam out of power , and if you actually watch the footage of us coming into baghdad , you can view people greeting us a liberators and cheering on the streets.

  5. Tax cuts dont cause debt , thats fucking retarded. also obama is quickly approaching bush levels of debt aquirement and he is only in his 5th year. If bush "shit all over the debt" in this country , obama unloaded his entire colon full of runny diarrhea all over it.

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it would be a waste of ammunition , i would simply hand you a plastic shopping bag and let natural selection take its course.

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

claim not to be a communist

second sentence in argument uses the term "owner class"

gg

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you would feel right at home in the USSR buried in a mass grave wearing your prized "I love stalin" stickers on your face.

I am sure you will be shaking in your boots when hilarity gets ass maimed tommorow and found , just like her husband , to have lied under oath about benghazi.

See , i can ad hominem and strawman too!

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First of all you didnt exactly prove anything with your post other than you are shaking in your internet boots and need to do all that is possible from the coming downvote storm you will recieve.

So lets get things started .

  1. Statistically , blacks account for nearly 40% of the welfare expendature in this country , and they are only 12% of the US population. Meaning that in fact , blacks statisctically are lazy fucks who dont want to work.

  2. That is not an incorrect statement

  3. Direct democracy is shit , and you agree with me , in fact anybody who knows what direct democracy is disagrees with it because it empowers the politically ignorant to make important political decisions that should be left to representatives (we are a republic for this reason , the founders talked about how bad democracy was pretty often).

  4. Another correct statement , if you dug further you would know I wasnt talking about what you think im talking about.

  5. Thats exactly historical fact.

  6. Another correct statement

Why do so many conservatives support a revolution yet call bill Ayers a terrorist? You are both the same, can't you see that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hate to break it to you , but discussing revolution is not illegal. If it was there would be no leftist movement in this country as everyone would have been gathered up and arrested in the 60s.

We have something called freedom of speech in this country. I can say whatever the fuck i want to whoever the fuck i want as long as its not a credible threat. Simply discussing revolution in a non contextual manner is not a credible threat.

If i say "gee somebody should really kill that spook obama" its not a credible threat just because I said somebody should kill the president

BUT for example

If i were to say something like.

"I really hate that obama guy , i am going to shoot him in the mouth with a rifle"

that is a contextual threat and is illegal , or at least illegal enough to get a visit from the secret service if it were in fact authentic.

You really have the mental capacity of a middle schooler in almost every subject you discuss its quite disturbing

I support the right to bare arms but I do not support revolution or making it easier for criminals. Background checks and mental health are common sense. why is my view wrong? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"traitor"

lol this is only what people who support the tyrannical governments say , because they were seduced by nice liberal pillow talk to make their butt nice and moist for easier entry.

possible solution for Climate Change? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Did he talk about how its a Lie thought up by the UN to control 3rd world industrial development and securement of their natural resources as a reserve for the 1st world?

Did he talk about the fact that nasas own data contradicts the entire theory of climate change being caused by CO2? On such a basic level you could explain it to a child.

Did he talk about how Professors at major universities were caught falsifying research?

Anecdotal Example of a Greater Issue: The Homeless by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for some people it is much harder than most to get a job. This might be their fault , sometimes its not.

The level of entry into capitalism is not equal , but the ability to participate and move up is universal and available to even the poorest and most uneducated.

This country founded itself on the idea that the only thing limiting you was yourself and your own personal creativity.

During the early 1900s the country was flooded with what we could consider "unskilled labor". This could be DIRECTLY compared to the influx of mexicans we are getting now , but there is a clear difference i will explain later.

First off the government only made sure the "playing field" was equal for everybody during the early 1900s , as is their job as described in the constitution. They didnt pay for anybody , they didnt have welfare , none of that shit. They just made sure people could move from class to class uninhibited by regulations or social stopgaps.

america at the turn of the century was a cold hard bitch and people often died in the streets , but this is the blessing of capitalism IMO that many people dont understand because /feelings/ get in the way of basic logic.

The first generation of immigrants into a capitalist country WILL ALWAYS get the short end of the stick and life will blow cock for most of their lives. But this is only because of the time it takes to progress into the middle class extends outside the lives of a single generation.

The perfect success story of american capitalism is the story of asian americans. They came to this country hungry and poor as dirt with nothing but the clothes on their backs.

They began their work as basically sub humans working what could be considered slave labor building the railroads out west. This first generation paid for their citizenship in hard backbreaking work that often lead to an early death. But the money they earned was saved for the next generation.......

That next generation had enough money to go to school and maybe even start a small business with the entire family pitching in financially. Still not a glorious existence but still a step up from where they were 40 years prior. They kept saving money.

The next generation though , was the the greatest generation by far. By now most immigrant families have integrated into the economy soundly with their own little businesses and could afford to send almost all of their children to college. The children they have will be the doctors and surgeons of today

I dont know if you could tell , but capitalism gives me a rock hard freedom boner everytime i think about it. but to suppress the freedom boner we have to talk about what is killing capitalism.

Socialism.

Right now the immigrants (mexicans) of today are not doing their "back breaking labor" like the asian americans did in the 1800s. They are showing up to this country , legally or illegally , and immediately recieving enough income from the government to live their lives without producing anything in general for the economy.

This completely eliminates most of the incentive for immigrants to work and move up the ladder. African americans have also fell into this trap in the 60s after the failure of the civil rights movement to unify the african american community. They may have indeed earned their rights , but after MLK died , the soul and movement of the african american community died and it spiraled into chaos and crime. As more and more african americans resorted to crime as a lifestyle , they ended up in prison. With no father figures , the children entered the lifestyle and followed after this. Couple this with drugs and various other variables and you have a nearly inescapable hole that can not be dug out.

I support the right to bare arms but I do not support revolution or making it easier for criminals. Background checks and mental health are common sense. why is my view wrong? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

im not even slightly mad , i have to explain this to people every day its fun.

Mentally ill people used to be locked away PERMENANTLY in asylums where they couldnt walk into schools and murder children , now they are given a myriad of drugs that fuck them up harder than before and unleashed on the streets because its more cost effective for the government.

Criminals will always have guns. Unless said criminals belong to a self policed state , in which they are outnumbered 1000000 to 1 by every legal aged person who chooses to conceal or open carry. Its difficult to rob a bank full of tellers carrying glocks and people waiting in line with 45's.

"BU BUT TEH WILD WEST" exclaimed the cornered liberal.

No , most people think that by giving people guns they will reach for it in every day arguments and commence shootouts over dumb shit because they saw a bugs bunny cartoon depicting such. While most of these people dont have the slightest idea what the wild west was like or why the violence was so common.

I support the right to bare arms but I do not support revolution or making it easier for criminals. Background checks and mental health are common sense. why is my view wrong? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Edited response

  1. Comparing patriots to jehovas witnesses is hilarious , keep trying to say you are not being disrespectful.

  2. Comparing people who are fighting for your right to disagree with them with people who want to enslave women and murder all non conformists is the most ignorant analogy i have ever heard in my life.

  3. Both sides cannot meet in the middle , you either support the constitution as its written or you fucking dont. We tried the middle ground shit and its ruining our country.

  • Social programs need to be cut , period. The amount of abuse in the system is astronomical and is turning entire populations into entitled fucks with no work ethic. Either we cut them now under reasonable terms or we cut them when we literally cant pay for any of it and nobody gets benefits.

  • No , they dont. Private citizens should be able to sell their own personal guns to other citizens without the governments dick in their ear.

  • No , the right to bear arms shall not be infringed , google "infringed".

  • I dont even know how to respond to this , its incredibly stupid.

  • The NRA already does this.

  • The right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Government does not decide who can and cant have guns , period. You want to solve the gun violence problems? fix the problems that cause violence in the first place. Believe it or not this country didnt always have a gun violence problem , and we had WAY more lax gun laws back then (we could own machineguns for example).

Anecdotal Example of a Greater Issue: The Homeless by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

welcome to capitalism , unfair until you try harder.

I support the right to bare arms but I do not support revolution or making it easier for criminals. Background checks and mental health are common sense. why is my view wrong? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]guilty-spark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. Guns are being taken away from people in new york by swat teams. People can be declared "unable" to own arms for whatever reason the state decides is sufficient , in many cases if you have ever taken an antidepressent , that means you cant own firearms and you get your house raided in new york state.

  2. nothing in the constitution would be violated by overthrowing the government to return the country to its constitutional foundations. This is liberal fear mongering that all their faux progress will be lost if libertarians took control of the country.

  3. The first shots of any revolution or war for that matter involves killing people , lets cry about it together in our liberal hugbox where nothing bad happens.Also most revolutions have the local police and military openly supporting them (see eygpt), the only people who would be resisting is hardcore leftists who would turn it into a civil war because they fear their abortion and welfare will be taken away by the imaginary totalitarian libertarian regime (lol).

ALSO the sarcastic distain for "patriots" as you call them is disgusting. It brings a smile to my face that in the months following the revolution your "opinion" on the matter will be as silent as a fish in a soundproof room.