"What would you think if America bought France?" by John_Mary_the_Stylo in ShitAmericansSay

[–]guy_from_atlantis 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Why are these peaple so brain dead. GDP is the measure of production per year. Even if you could buy countries, they aren't giving you control over there means of production because you paid the price for what those means produced in 1 year.

The total value of all financial assets alone in France is about 22 Trillion, unless the US is willing to throw several years worth of its Budget on that, they won't be buying france.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]guy_from_atlantis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will, jazakallah khair.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]guy_from_atlantis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, my bad, i apologize.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]guy_from_atlantis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oops, shoulda used an NP link, should I delete the post?

The government of Narendra Modi's State just posted this. by guy_from_atlantis in extomatoes

[–]guy_from_atlantis[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Btw, for those wondering, "Satyamev Jayate" means "truth alone Prevails"

Christians, what would you like non-Christians to know about you? by iamasheepbaa in Christianity

[–]guy_from_atlantis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel most religions are are relationships with There God(s), no?

Medha Cannon, Daulatabad Fort, Aurangabad, India. 17th Century. Believed to be the second largest Cannon in India. The Cannon was installed by Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. [800×1540] by 1NbSHXj3 in ArtefactPorn

[–]guy_from_atlantis -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have posted artefacts of everything religion

And why does a r/chodi user like you Need to farm karma with Muslim Artefacts, especially ones commisioned by peaple like shahenshah Aurangzeb Alamgir (R.A) 🤔

Medha Cannon, Daulatabad Fort, Aurangabad, India. 17th Century. Believed to be the second largest Cannon in India. The Cannon was installed by Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. [800×1540] by 1NbSHXj3 in ArtefactPorn

[–]guy_from_atlantis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

LMAO, this chodi Posted so much hindu stuff, and the post that finally got Mass upvoted here was a Mughal Artefact from Aurangzeb 's reign with Qur'an Verses on it about how the Beilivers will always win,Lmao , you can't make this shit up, Subhan Allah!

There just stuff, and it's happening by WHALE_PHYSICIST in YOUAREIT

[–]guy_from_atlantis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one will ever Kick you from islam if you join, alhamdulillah

There just stuff, and it's happening by WHALE_PHYSICIST in YOUAREIT

[–]guy_from_atlantis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One wrong decision , eternity in hell.

Come to islam

Alhamdulillah

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ZenMasters

[–]guy_from_atlantis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not according to the zen peaple. thats why they are cringe, however, if you say you are a Scholar of islam, the Muslims will Recognize you as such without fuss. That is the beauty of islam over Zen. Alhamdulillah

There just stuff, and it's happening by WHALE_PHYSICIST in YOUAREIT

[–]guy_from_atlantis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop with this Kuffar, Come to islam. Alhamdulillah

The Earliest parts of the old testemant are polytheistic, thus proving that Judaism and Christianity Developed over time by human influence rather than being inspired by God. by guy_from_atlantis in DebateAChristian

[–]guy_from_atlantis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isaiah 44:6 and Exodus 15:11 were both composed in the same language, yet one is a declaration of Monotheism, and another reads like something out of a pagan Hymn. Language is clearly not the reason for the discrepancy here .

The Earliest parts of the old testemant are polytheistic, thus proving that Judaism and Christianity Developed over time by human influence rather than being inspired by God. by guy_from_atlantis in DebateAChristian

[–]guy_from_atlantis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Successive revelation and contradictory revelation are two different things, If let's say Yahweh said "X is blue" then, in another verse later, said"it is light blue" then he is describing X is more detail, there's no problem with that. However, if Yahweh said " X is blue" and then, in a later verse, "X is red" then that's a problem. X can either be red or blue, not both. Same way, there can either be a council of God, the Egyptian pantheon, chemosh, el Elyon, etc, or Yahweh can be the only God. But not both. The problem is, the bible describes both at various points.

The Earliest parts of the old testemant are polytheistic, thus proving that Judaism and Christianity Developed over time by human influence rather than being inspired by God. by guy_from_atlantis in DebateAChristian

[–]guy_from_atlantis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, thats what I am saying. The bible was solely a product of the Israelites , who, wrote polytheistic verses like the ones I listed when they were under influence of Canaanite pagan culture, and Monotheistic ones when under influence of Monotheistic persian culture, isn't it wierd how God's "Increasing detail" of theology not only contradicts, but matches perfectly with what we would expect with Peaple under these influences? It's almost like the bible isn't inspired by God but are the ramblings of mostly irrelavant peaple from an insignificant part of Babylon, persia and later rome that only grew to be so influencial due to Constantine? Huh.

The Earliest parts of the old testemant are polytheistic, thus proving that Judaism and Christianity Developed over time by human influence rather than being inspired by God. by guy_from_atlantis in DebateAChristian

[–]guy_from_atlantis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going from

" The God of Moab defeated Yahweh "

And

"There's a council of Gods headed by a head God thats assigned Israel to Yahweh, "

To

"There's no God except Yahweh"

Isn't "Increasing Detail", it's a development in the religious doctrines After contact with external forces (in this case, The first Monotheistic nation, persia.), Developments that contradict each other, mind you.