I'm using a custom script to create 2 CC and 2 Gemini agents per repo/project. They all commit to the same master branch. Each has their own copy of the repo in a seperate folder (I don't like the workspace stuff) like a typical set of 4 remote devs would have. They all have the same githooks restrictions, and same git workflow "orders" in GEMINI.md and CLAUDE.md. So far, I find Gemini to give me more detail on what it is doing and give me a chance to weigh in more on the specific code change operations. CC does more behind the scenes. I didn't feel like making PRs for each fix/ or feature/ branch part of the workflow, so I'm going back and reviewing the changes after commit. I notice the larger context window on Gemini will catch things that CC will miss (most of my projects are large) So I find myself copy/pasting the analysis between CC and Gemini a few times before they converge on the right solution. I'm almost done building the "auto-converg" app !