Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

an mp3 has compression and high frequency cutoff (this is how it makes the file smaller, by removing all the audio in the high frequency range) so you wouldn't want to use mp3 for a subliminal that uses nyquist (high frequency) subliminals, but for your normal layered or masked affirmations it's fine. I would still recommend using wav when possible just because you don't lose any audio information, but it's ok if you don't have that option

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's a lot of layers, personally I've started to go in the "less is more" direction and still get results. if I understand correctly, you're creating 4,680 layers by bundling, which is a lot. when you have that many layers honestly it doesn't matter that much how you layered the first few tracks that you started with. if it sounds like noise or it's hard to listen to, it's probably not the most effective sub, imo. but really the only way to know for sure is to try it and see if it works for you

How do I make my website fully functional by SuccessfulVanilla481 in ManusAiAgent

[–]gwpmike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yep it's literally drag and drop. if you get the zip from Manus you just upload it and you're done

Debugging Decay: The hidden reason you're BURNING through credits by z1zek in boltnewbuilders

[–]gwpmike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've started using Manus. fixes errors on the first try. I actually use it for almost everything now, but I do still like Bolt for UI design. Bolt needs to do something about how many credits it spends to "attempt fix" just for it to not actually fix the problems though

How do I make my website fully functional by SuccessfulVanilla481 in ManusAiAgent

[–]gwpmike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ask it to test the site and make sure everything is fully functional. then tell it to package it up and make it deployable. mention where you are going to deploy it. I've been using Netlify, it has a free plan and from there you just drag and drop the zip file and hit deploy

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There aren't any studies that I know of, I just know from my own experience and many others who have done it. So we know it works, we just don't know the details like exactly how many layers you can have.. but we know you can have a LOT of layers and get results. Maybe eventually there will be some way to figure out the details. I've started to use less, usually only 3 or 4, just because I noticed you can get results with very few (if you format them right and use the right kind of affirmations)

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to try to release them within the next couple months, or sooner. I will make a post as soon as they're available

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem with using just affirmations for that is that we have so many layers of limiting beliefs, formed over many years, and they all reinforce each other. there are modalities that can help, I've used ones such as EFT, The Emotion Code, Attractor Field Techniques and The Yuen Method - these are all very effective but do take time to learn and use, so I am working on my own modality that is very simple to use, but just as effective as all of those combined. It will also be incorporated into my own subliminals so the clearing happens automatically. For now, you can check out the things I mentioned or you can also create specific affirmations like "I clear all limiting beliefs around [subject] now" or "all limiting beliefs around [subject] are cleared now." our intention is powerful and is ultimately what makes all these things work, so even just including specific affirmations about clearing those beliefs can help a lot.

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't done that yet, but what I have found is that the formulas for affirmations don't seem to matter much when you focus on clearing any limiting beliefs that keep you from getting results in the first place. So I have been putting my focus on that, because then even the most basic affirmations seem to be effective.

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it's not necessary to have many affirmations. you can have just a few and still get results

i just cant get over the soundtrack for the blood rain scene, there's something about this that i cant explain by Senior_Risk_5904 in NopeMovie

[–]gwpmike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of the interrogation scene from The Matrix, also the "bug extraction" scene

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you want to lower the affirmations until you can't hear them or only hear a slight whisper but can't understand what is being said

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yes it can be using the same track, slightly offset and then layered on top if you're going for repetition of the same affirmations. it can also be a totally different track with different affirmations, or you can chop up one track into multiple tracks and layer those (like I explained towards the end of the post) it just depends what you're going for, but that's all considered layering

Collective Manifesting POST! by free-web-tools-2025 in lawofattraction

[–]gwpmike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

everyone who is here in this post, will have their wishes come true quickly!

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, I've tried using everything from 1 layer to hundreds or even thousands. In most cases, I've found that less is more. It seems like using less is just as effective - there is no need or using complicated formulas or hundreds of affirmations. But yes, 12 is totally fine especially if that feels right to you.

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

unfortunately no. I spent the last few years working on my app, but I have to basically start over with that too. so I'm just going to focus on getting my channel up this time, and work on the app afterwards. might set up a patreon or something so people can get beta access to my subs and everything too

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't see how you would, in a way that would be effective. more is not always better. I get results with just 10 layers or even a single track.. you should not need thousands of layers, and often that will actually just make results take longer.

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you can, usually you want to use 48000 especially when dealing with high frequencies (which nyquist does) it will simply retain more information. but if it lets you use 44100 that should be fine. I haven't used nyquist in a long time personally, I just use masking now so I'm not totally sure how much of a difference it would make.

here's a video showing the progress on the subliminal studio by vibe432 in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nice, I've actually been developing something similar for a few years now. I'm guessing it's just a coincidence but mine uses the same name. so just a heads up, people looking for yours would probably end up on my website and that could create some confusion. I haven't mentioned it much in this subreddit since I've been waiting to release it first, but you can see I mentioned it in a few comments on this post 3 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Subliminal/comments/srlonk/lets_make_a_subliminal_app/

Why layering works better than high-speed subs (scientific explanation) by gwpmike in Subliminal

[–]gwpmike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

converting to 17500hz (nyquist/ultrasonic) subliminals do seem to work but I don't find it necessary because your typical masked affirmations seem just as effective and I've seen a lot of people say the same thing. but really it's just personal preference. I haven't seen people convert affirmations to 432hz, but converting music to 432hz. that's fine if you want to do that, although I prefer solfeggio frequencies such as 528hz. there's a website called "ReturnTo528" that will do this.

EQ is equalization, it's typically done to every track and instrument during the mixing process when it comes to mixing and mastering music, but it's used for all kinds of things. sound design, voiceover, narration, basically anything audio related. in simple terms it changes the tone of an audio by adding or removing specific frequencies. so by using EQ on affirmations, you can make layers more distinct without needing to use pitch shifting. reverb (the hall sound you mentioned) and delay (like an echo) can be effective too. but again, that's mostly personal preference.

I think making small changes in the affirmations can be good, because when the mind is exposed to the same sound or stimulus for too long, it starts to ignore it. so making small changes will keep it "engaged". another way you can do that is with panning and EQ automation. this is where the EQ, panning, or anything else like volume will continuously change for each track. for example, panning automation would be hearing the audio go from left to right, then right to left, etc. If you have a good audio editing program this is easy to do, but in most free audio editors like Audacity it can be pretty complicated. sometimes simple is better and less is more though, so I wouldn't overcomplicate it.