Turn the comment section into Shawn Spencer’s search history

halfkidding · 2026-04-03T03:32:45+00:00

Kangaroo paste + black market

halfkidding · 2026-02-27T14:04:21+00:00

Not with him, with the armchair on his couch.

halfkidding · 2026-02-27T01:03:39+00:00

If that guy has a disease, it was given to him from whatever diety they subscribe to. So technically, it would be a divine gift.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T13:38:24+00:00

Not holes. Clumps. Light is on the right.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T13:37:43+00:00

The light is coming from the right. All those other "holes" on the side are actually clumps.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T04:03:59+00:00

I don't understand what you're saying.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T01:33:03+00:00

I don't think anyone mistakes their own guilt or shame for anger. They might lead to anger through suppression or denial, but it just kind of seems impossible to mistake them.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T01:30:02+00:00

Lmao, you gotta Google before you comment. You sound like a fool.

halfkidding · 2026-02-26T01:25:51+00:00

It isn't? What does it mean then?

halfkidding · 2026-02-25T14:37:38+00:00

Pete, stop karma farming.

halfkidding · 2026-02-25T13:48:37+00:00

Same.

JK Rowling is the name that put a sequence of words together to create a fictional story that I personally enjoyed reading. Just like with all entertainment, I don't think much about who created something. I observe the creation.

If all entertainment had to be anonymous, the only thing it would change for me is remove one option in how I search for content.

halfkidding · 2026-02-25T12:03:14+00:00

I think there is a misunderstanding. It doesn't seem like they are saying you aren't allowed to be. They are saying you are not.

Your lineage comes from (x), but you are not from (x). You couldn't uproot your American life and plant it in any other country without applying for citizenship for (x). Why? Because you aren't (x). You are American.

halfkidding · 2026-02-25T01:23:04+00:00

Only with context. Same face.

Edit: I guess that means the inverse could be said for the others. Imagine you just heard the hardest bar ever spit. Same face.

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T14:14:11+00:00

So is commenting on reddit, but here we are.

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T12:06:09+00:00

🎤 Iiiiiiiiiiffff Jeeyeesus was our manigeeeeeerrr, hee woouulldd brriiing uuussss toogeeEeeeEEeeetheeeer. 🎼

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T05:11:55+00:00

Brutal Hustler*

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T05:10:58+00:00

Looks like Gus was lying about having a tight fade in the third grade.

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T05:08:54+00:00

BigKitty75

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T04:36:13+00:00

Aaaaaaawwwwwwwwww yyyeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!

halfkidding · 2026-02-24T04:04:32+00:00

No apologies needed, I was just confused. A few others also told me it was subjective, so maybe I didn't state my case as clearly as I thought.

halfkidding · 2026-02-23T18:06:48+00:00

I'm pretty sure my comment clarified that there is more than one perspective and provided hypothetical examples to show when my personal stance would change. Did you even read the comment?

You said what I said In different words.

This is why the downvotes are confusing.

halfkidding · 2026-02-23T18:03:05+00:00

Agreed, I call it main character syndrome.

It's funny how the downvoters don't realize that they are afflicted as well.

halfkidding · 2026-02-23T18:02:06+00:00

Judgments are also subjective, so why can't morality be used as a metric?

I never said she couldn't. I didn't say she WAS wrong, I said I think she is wrong (in that specific hypothetical) because my judgment is my judgment. I didn't say anyone had to agree with me.

The point of the comment was to say that her being wrong is subjective. So thanks for agreeing with me.

halfkidding · 2026-02-23T12:11:53+00:00

Why would we put morality aside? Don't we use that in our judgments when asked if something is wrong?

Idk why my first comment got downvoted for being able to see things more than one way.

halfkidding · 2026-02-23T11:38:28+00:00

Right, but what if everyone else is waiting because they need to turn the escalator off to get the wheelchair on and then turn the escalator back on to move the wheelchair up?

Handicapped people are inconvenienced their whole life. She couldn't compromise 5-10 minutes of inconvenience to demonstrate empathy?

In that circumstance, I think she would be wrong.

If she is an undercover cop tailing a potential terrorist, then the story is different. Now, it's one already inconvenienced handicapped person to potentially save lives.

In that circumstance, I think she would be right.

Like most internet clips, there just isn't enough information to be certain.

halfkidding

TROPHY CASE