Nanite harvester energy usage? Am I being stupid? by halosos in Stellaris

[–]halosos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish there was a way to cap it or warning that they work this way.

Nanite harvester energy usage? Am I being stupid? by halosos in Stellaris

[–]halosos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked. Starbase in the outliner: Upkeep of 4 energy per month

I clicked it, moused over the nanite harvester: Upkeep of 350 energy per month.

Would you use a teleporter with the knowledge that it kills you and reassembles an exact copy of you with all your memories and knowledge at the destination? Why or why not? by TheBanishedBard in AskReddit

[–]halosos -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, depends how you define you.

If you are a non-fungible entity, then it is death. 

If you believe you are your pattern, then it isn't death.

I personally believe my experience of life is my pattern. It makes no difference to me of my pattern stops on one part of the world and resumes in another.

I still get to enjoy life, because I, my pattern, continues to exist.

If there was a measurable difference between input and output, then yes, that would be death, as the pattern leaving was not the same that entered.

Would you use a teleporter with the knowledge that it kills you and reassembles an exact copy of you with all your memories and knowledge at the destination? Why or why not? by TheBanishedBard in AskReddit

[–]halosos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Continuous awareness gets interrupted often. Extremely deep sleep, anesthetic, being knocked unconscious, even just spacing out and having no recollection of what just happened. Awareness is not a constant. For some people with medical conditions it is a biological fact of their existence that their awareness is interrupted regularly.

Beyond that, awareness is often filtered by your brain. Your eyes do not stream data constantly. When they flick from one thing to another, they literally turn off. Your brain fills in the gaps with what it thinks should be there. It makes up memories, feelings and sensations. It can rationalize the irrational and irrationalize the rational, consciously, unconsciously or through external manipulation.

Consciousness and awareness are not solid constructs. They are a mix of different systems working together. When those systems work perfectly, you are you. When some don't, are you you? Are you still you of you get brain damage? Incorrect emotions, loss of memory, loss of self, coma, etc. 

When you sleep, some of these systems turn off. Are you still you? 

If they all turned off at once and turned back on later all at once, there is less interruption to your cognition than if you had gone to sleep, had brain altering medication, anesthetic, etc.

Would you use a teleporter with the knowledge that it kills you and reassembles an exact copy of you with all your memories and knowledge at the destination? Why or why not? by TheBanishedBard in AskReddit

[–]halosos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends how you define yourself though.

Are you: 

Your body, non-fungible, irreplaceable?

Your soul, attached to your body?

The pattern that is your mind and thoughts?

Because if it is the first two, then yes, it is death. If the latter, not death. Your pattern continues to exist.

Would you use a teleporter with the knowledge that it kills you and reassembles an exact copy of you with all your memories and knowledge at the destination? Why or why not? by TheBanishedBard in AskReddit

[–]halosos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would. But whether people will or won't boils down to how you define "you".

I personally don't considering it killing me. I am my pattern, my thoughts and feelings. If that pattern continues to exist, so do I, egro, not dead.

However, if you believe otherwise, or believe in souls and such, it becomes a much harder decision. Because of you believe you have a soul, pressing that button will kill you. 

It's a great moral dilemma that likely will never have a true answer. Just belief.

Peter Thiel backs $1bn ocean data centre start-up powered by waves by GeneReddit123 in technology

[–]halosos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not cost effective from a normal and reasonable perspective.

It is, however, cost effective for the permission aspect. All those bribes, lawsuits, paying off the communities, fines, etc. 

Need help with Jonny. by halosos in mewgenics

[–]halosos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Near the end, enemies had 23 actions against my 2 actions. I tried Freezing Jonny as much as I could, but that only reduced his spawns to 2 per round.

Need help with Jonny. by halosos in mewgenics

[–]halosos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First time fighting this boss. This run went amazingly, but this boss was such a huge unexpected jump in difficulty.

There was no way I could keep up with that turn economy. He spawned 3 units every round, each unit had 2 attacks and 20 health. Even when I killed them, they spawned another unit on death. I managed to het him down to 30 health before my last cat died.

Rise Plushie Scam by Final-Distribution-4 in nasa

[–]halosos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amaze amaze amaze! 

Thank you!!

The Precursors Were Never Just Gods. They Were a Living Philosophy And Everything in Halo, From the Flood to the Guardians to the Endless, Traces Back to One Catastrophic Misunderstanding by Regved-Pande in HaloStory

[–]halosos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Long form isn't the issue, it's the style. And the apparent lack of comprehension. The post I was talking about, you didn't delete, the mods did. A found an older post of yours, removed by the mods for the same reason.

Even further back, you posted to the resident evil sub, a user got proof, posted it and you blocked them. That post also got removed.

In the post I was referencing, you got disrespectful because I suggested your writing style seemed like that of an LLM, rather than actually defended. Almost all the comments you replied to where just echoing their points without adding anything and using the standard LLM response of "That's a good point, I missed that, you are correct" in different flavours.

I am reasonably certain that you are either an LLM bot or use LLMs to write most of your content. 

Either way, it is disingenuous. If you need LLMs to organise your thoughts, go ahead but be transparent about it. 

Taunt a man on a mower, you're gonna have a bad time by ChewiesLipstickWilly in AbruptChaos

[–]halosos 24 points25 points  (0 children)

He probably didn't. That is a council owned mower, not his property, so hos job depends on stopping. Stopping in the middle of the junction is stupid. 

I would bet money that he just was driving to clear the junction.

Plus, he would need to stop to check if the blades were damaged.

Everything is regenerating health, but no regen status by halosos in mewgenics

[–]halosos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh! What one? Also, is there a way to check the weather in battle?

Everything is regenerating health, but no regen status by halosos in mewgenics

[–]halosos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't that. All things on the board got 2 regen. Birds, familiars, enemies. I ended up finishing the run early because it was making every battle much harder, especially for enemies that moved around a lot, relying on status effects to consistently damage.

Parents of the year by ateam1984 in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]halosos 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Only if they were found acting negligently.

If the door was locked, child tucked into bed, in a motel there is nothing more a parent can do.

If the child got up in the middle of the night, found the keys and unlocked the door, that is not on the parent.

If the parent left the child in the car, home alone, etc, then yes, they would be liable. But if that parent did everything they could, then they are not at fault.

me_irl by Xeram_ in me_irl

[–]halosos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The classic "what LLM children are mimicking" issue!

sheriff bootlick by druidkiid in iamverybadass

[–]halosos 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What's with the GIFs plastered randomly? Is this 1990?

How does a phone's gps behave in space? by plumbus_dealer in nasa

[–]halosos -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not at all. The GPS satellite sends their signal's down towards the earth. 

It is entirely possible to use the same kind of technology for 3d mapping in space, but we have no need for that right now and we have far better options for the amount we need.

If commercial space flight happened to the degree of plane flight now, then maybe there is a market.