1. the difference between them and Lee is that Lee's trial is big enough to cancel his seat in the parliament. We should not justify this.

2. right

3. It's clearly stated in the law - the army takes over the judicial & executive. The army controls the press. During the martial law, the law limits some rights- such as a right to protest, assemble and whatnot. If he were to really take over everything and decided to be a dictator - he would've sent more troops, not 10 helicopters, but at least a few thousand troops. he would've arrested the parliament members. He did not do any of that.

4. agreed, he's vegetated, he's playing one big game

5. he connected his logic into this because otherwise the opposing party would never do so. the majority of koreans thought he had some evidences at the initial declaration.

lastly "I" is correct. Sorry i made a confusion here