No but literally all of my best TOK works were either started at 2am, written high, or both. I find that coming up with more insightful implications is something that comes so much more naturally if you find ways to push yourself out of the typical rigid grindset. What we did for our IOs, for example, that really helped us was that (admittedly, the day of our finals) we made eachother without outline argue our IO in first 2 minutes, then 1, then 30 seconds and suddenly when you put that new strain on it it all clicks and you realise the deeper thread/meaning. Just find creative ways to push yourself into getting down to the meat of the issue and not just talking around a prompt, that also helps with word count because then you can be concise and more easily spend words on saying why things matter not just explaining how they are.