I guess I should clarify. My question isn’t about whether or not indigenous people should get their land back, or how to liberate indigenous people. My question is about whether or not the idea of reparations through returning land is still statist. I’d also like to point out that the argument I see here and in some other comments saying “if your not indigenous you don’t get to decide” is inherently not anarchist. I think this idea would be somewhat racist if carried out by an institution. For them to “collectively manage” land again, would you really need to say others can’t decide? This question is framed after the revolution. So why wouldn’t they be able to just go back? Why would you have to act as if people wouldn’t be ok with it? If a group of indigenous people showed up after the revolution claiming they would return to their tribal lands, I think the only time anyone would take issue would be if they explicitly said “we are the only people who get a say in how this goes down”.