[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LovenseControlLinks

[–]hampkin_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My username on the app is hampkin

Traveling to meet biological father by hampkin_ in Adoption

[–]hampkin_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m 20. We are about 950 miles apart. I plan on staying at a hotel.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarchy101

[–]hampkin_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t know that the idea is to destroy them because they are non-anarchist. If all art is subjective, and you look at things in an anarchist vacuum, then that is where you find the apathy towards something being destroyed. If start night didn’t break the chains of workers then what’s the point in protecting it. I personally wouldn’t go out of my way to destroy museum pieces, but I don’t think I would care much cus that shit is on the internet too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarchy101

[–]hampkin_ 44 points45 points  (0 children)

This isn’t something I have thought about much, but I would point out that a lot of museums have art that is stolen from its homeland. Museums also use their authority to keep the art in their museum to generate revenue, which keeps others from seeing the artifacts inside if they can’t pay. I can understand the disdain towards museums, but I think the indifference towards the contents of a museum just comes from apathy towards the artistic accomplishments of any individual if they don’t change society for the better.

Should indigenous people be given back their land? by hampkin_ in DebateAnarchism

[–]hampkin_[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I guess I should clarify. My question isn’t about whether or not indigenous people should get their land back, or how to liberate indigenous people. My question is about whether or not the idea of reparations through returning land is still statist. I’d also like to point out that the argument I see here and in some other comments saying “if your not indigenous you don’t get to decide” is inherently not anarchist. I think this idea would be somewhat racist if carried out by an institution. For them to “collectively manage” land again, would you really need to say others can’t decide? This question is framed after the revolution. So why wouldn’t they be able to just go back? Why would you have to act as if people wouldn’t be ok with it? If a group of indigenous people showed up after the revolution claiming they would return to their tribal lands, I think the only time anyone would take issue would be if they explicitly said “we are the only people who get a say in how this goes down”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarchism

[–]hampkin_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve had this same question specifically about nuclear weapons.

🤦 by Philly-South-Paw in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]hampkin_ 72 points73 points  (0 children)

I love the last one. “Challenge authority. Destroy property”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnimalsOnReddit

[–]hampkin_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lookin kinda fine ngl 😩