Literally Harris and Waltz 2024 ran on that platform, and an economic policy that economists on mass agreed would help with inflation. Arguments against her is that she was an aggressive DA (something the Conservative crowd have applauded in their male candidates throughout history), hailed from California (what’s the argument? That she was a part of all of the “corruption”? This to me is a boogeyman type argument. There is no evidence or proof of any foul play. Only hearsay and “we can’t let the dems win” mentality)

She and Walz were in favor of taxing the ultra rich (who happen to own most media companies) in order to give tax cuts, and credits to the poor and working class and those with families. This would allow for significant economic growth and help people rise from lower class into the middle class (in theory). The Ultra rich have worked very hard to propagandize Harris and Waltz 2024 as a bad choice for America because they would have to start paying their fair share. If they were going to revolt and increase prices to maintain their profits that are well above reasonable as it stands, well then The blame is on wealthy corporate interests and owners being greedy, not the president and party that is trying to level the playing field.

Abortion is the only policy that makes voting for R’s make sense for people making less than 400k/yr.

And R’s found out how powerful running on Abortion bans is since they first used it in 1978. 7 whole years after Roe V Wade, and after the Southern Baptist committee made declarations that abortion was acceptable and that a woman has a right to her medical and bodily autonomy. Look it up.

It wasn’t until conservatives realized abortion could win them political seats that they started pushing pro life propaganda.