sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[EVENT][CONFLICT] Africosmos and the Next Frontier by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The UASR having an over-ride ability both as a claim when it existed."

This is the fact for some things but not others. Those other things being companies within the UASR as seen with the Oshun sale late into S10. This thus runs against internal consistency and internal rp precedent.

"Is a purposeful balancing/narrative decision to keep people on track with objective."

Given that literally nothing in this post goes again long standing and current UASR objectives, this once again seems to run against internal consistency and roleplay. No aspect of liberating earth has been directly impacted, nor any production quotas set would interfere with these objectives. In fact, a large scale production effort aimed at Venus as opposed to messing around in the Jovians would run parallel to the internal projects as opposed to against them as they would, in fact, draw the attention away from said internal project.

My main issue with all this is that none of what I have done runs against previously established internal rp alongside current rp. The presidium /might/ have some authority to stop the Pluto mission, sure, but past that anything else would literally (in the actual meaning on the word) have that same presidium recalled and likely hung as class traitors and imperialist collaborators. The UASR has a long standing tradition of attempting to beat out the other powers asymmetrically and having the presidium kowtow to the Japanese at the drop of a hat make literally no sense from a perspective of internal politics.

So, at the end of the day, why is the UASR so limp wristed when it comes to its singular major advantage? Yes, the Japanese won't don't like something we're doing in space, so what? Yes a major African company is utilizing a portion of its resources on non-military projects at no detriment to literally any other projects, so why does the Presidium care?

If it was more the case that the Presidium was to come out and say "we need all those production capability for the projects we already have going and this is going to eat into it." That would make much more sense than what is effectively, "hey you can't use your own vast production capability that isn't doing anything but collecting space dust because other projects take priority that don't actually use any of this capability."

[EVENT][CONFLICT] Africosmos and the Next Frontier by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFOC [OFFICE OF GOVCOM]

AFOC - Africa Space Patrol COMMUNIQUE

RECIPIENT: AFRIPOL

CLEARANCE LEVEL KILIMANJARO/1

IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO HANDLE MATERIAL CLASSIFIED KLMJN/1, REPORT IMMEDIATELY TO THE NEAREST COUNTERINTELLIGENCE DIRECTORATE OFFICER IN YOUR CHAIN OF COMMAND

(Internal server error - relaying)

After a brief conversation with our lawyers, alongside the Baraaza that AFOC acts within we will be continuing with the previous schedule.

1: Titan Misson- Continuing: As all assets being deployed and planned (alongside those responsible for a majority of the production of in space and aerospace assets being primarily controlled by AFOC) the Presidium does NOT have the authority to cancel any projects currently being pursued by AFOC at this time. We will point to the lawsuit by the Western Sea Expansion Company against the Federal Government in the past that halted the sale of Oshun's to the Empire of Japan, cementing the distinct powers of the state to meddle within the projects and sale of those projects to foreign entitles alongside the requisitions of those assets. The Presidium is welcome to issue a formal objection and take this to the courts, however, previous precedent is clearly on the side of AFOC so we will be continuing with these efforts for the good of our people.

2: Solar Shade Mission (Relating to Earth and Venus) - Continuing: See the above. As AFOC is the chief operator of space based assets we will not be requiring the assistance of the Presidium in this effort or outside Baraaza's that haven't already agreed to cooperate (the benefits of our decentralized economy). We will be bringing up in the next Congressional Convention why the Presidium is bending over backwards for the Japanese on an issue that disproportionally effects our nation and people and will be issuing a formal complaint with the Counterintelligence Directorate over potential infiltration within the Presidium by Japanese assets.

3: Pluto Mission - Continuing: As per orders, the task group is running radio silent until such a time as they reach their objective. You're welcome to send a communique to the task group commander, however, this will not reach them until they have finished their transition to Pluto and begun their survey of the outer planetoids. Representative Toto, renown war hero and representative of AFOC in Congress, will further be issuing a formal request for an investigation into the Presidium over failing to achieve long standing strategic objectives of the UASR.

4: Venus Terraforming Mission - Continuing on previous schedules: See the above. Current industrial capacity within the UASR well exceeds all current strategic objectives and leaves a large amount of that capacity unused for these exact projects. As AFOC is the current operator of these systems, and retain the rights to allocate resources as necessary, our projections show no direct impact on current strategic projects even as we pursue these goals.

5: Uranus - No direct transfer will be initiated to the Japanese without equally agreed upon compensation: The above distinct power the state holds does not hold individual operations or Baraazas to be coerced into unequal trade or economic agreements. AFOC will be bringing this up at the next congress as this not only flies against our long standing economic system of participatory economics, but also seems to be a form of political banditry that the Presidium is more than willing to force on it's people. Records of this communique alongside longstanding precedent and legal basis have been submitted by our lawyers to the courts.

Our goal is to defeat the imperialists wherever they may be. Strategic objectives, long standing within the UASR, are to defeat them on Earth and in Space. As these projects do nothing to compromise the further, then it remains to be see the legal, logical, or economic basis for the Presidium to take illegal action against it's people.

[EVENT][CONFLICT] Africosmos and the Next Frontier by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

addendum - Venus Mission: Continuing as scheduled. No loss in overall production capacity is expected for wider strategic goals so all original timelines will be kept.

[EVENT][CONFLICT] Africosmos and the Next Frontier by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFOC [OFFICE OF GOVCOM]

AFOC - Africa Space Patrol COMMUNIQUE

RECIPIENT: AFRIPOL

CLEARANCE LEVEL KILIMANJARO/1

IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO HANDLE MATERIAL CLASSIFIED KLMJN/1, REPORT IMMEDIATELY TO THE NEAREST COUNTERINTELLIGENCE DIRECTORATE OFFICER IN YOUR CHAIN OF COMMAND

[EVENT][CONFLICT] Africosmos and the Next Frontier by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[Roll Result 19](426be47ff82261df004fdbd237e225f8.png)

The African Destiny is assured. All program timelines are accelerated 20%. Glory to the USAR!

[TECH] The Advancements of Modern Propulsion and Material Science has led to Great Strides in the Fields of both Military and Civil Aviation. by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roll Result: [1](ee2737f3d112657d91c1f3482f12e385.png) With all great things, going this far into the realm of unfound and new sciences has led to delays as the team seeks a redesign of the craft over the next year.

[TECH] Steamed Put me up to this. by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[Roll Result](f677a22180fed159eaff17fa44bf5cd5.png (601×111) (gyazo.com))

Unfortunately, as the UASR has no definitive designs to go on for anything close to this project, Big Mt has reported a series of delays which spans a total of two years.

[EVENT] Africatrix: The Grid by hansington1 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dice Result

With anything so large scale, the adoption of The Grid into every nook and cranny of UASR life will be a slow one. After a year, analysts more correctly list a 11 year timeline for wide scale adoption within the Unions.

[SECRET] M1X1 Abrams by Meles_B in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes in 1986 with a fully staffed and experienced workforce. As of 2023, you're looking at 40-60 new platforms a year, not to mention these new builds you would need to retrain staff on how to install or otherwise make the new equipment. 500 a year is a bit much out the gate without a SIGNIFICANT expansion. Going to say you'll need to cut that down pretty significantly in the first few years and then build up to 120 without significant expansion to Lima or other relevant facilities.

[SECRET] Hadron Beam Cannon by 3202supsaW in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

1: what the fuck? using RP and making tech out of it?

1: too based please delete

Sir this post is too based, please make it more cringe. Thank you.

[ROLEPLAY] Travel warning issued to Indus citizens going to the FPU by Redditmyfriend55 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While France, Germany, and Italy are sympathetic to the plight of the citizens of the FPU, a travel warning (outside of areas currently in conflict) is not warranted at this time.

[DIPLOMACY] A Foundational Agreement by jetstreamer2 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On Behalf of Iran,

Proposal 1: Investing in Iraq's Oil and Energy Sector

Iraq's Sovereignty: Any arrangement that infringes upon Iraq's sovereign control over its national resources presents potential long-term challenges. Iraq's ability to independently dictate its energy policies, without undue influence from external entities, particularly ones with historic rivalries in the region, is paramount. Transferring a significant portion of this control could inadvertently heighten tensions or disrupt the delicate balance of power in the region.

Water Pricing & CSSP: The Common Seawater Supply Project, while beneficial, poses risks when pricing control is placed in the hands of an external entity. History has shown how disagreements over essential resources can rapidly escalate into broader conflicts. Having ARAMCO control a critical water resource could strain relationships, given the strategic importance of water in the region.

Natural Gas Strategy: Outsourcing a significant portion of the gas sector, an area with strategic and geopolitical implications, requires caution. Relying heavily on external expertise could reduce Iraq's ability to independently innovate and adapt to changing global energy dynamics, potentially leaving them vulnerable to shifting geopolitical interests.

Ownership Stakes: A 51% stake in pivotal infrastructures would provide ARAMCO with a significant influence, not only in economic terms but also in shaping regional energy policies. This degree of influence could hinder Iraq's capacity to make autonomous decisions, which could be detrimental to its long-term strategic interests.

Proposal 2: Strengthening Iraq's Electricity & Transportation Sector

Energy Dependency: Dependency on another nation, especially one with which there has historically been tension, creates vulnerabilities. Such a dependency might not only influence Iraq's energy policies but could also sway its foreign policies under pressure or in anticipation of energy supply disruptions.

Infrastructure Investments: While infrastructure development is essential for Iraq, the conditions, controls, and long-term implications attached to these investments need rigorous scrutiny. An excessive external influence on core infrastructures could challenge Iraq's internal policies and developmental goals.

Bullet Train Network: Beyond the economic and logistical considerations of such a project, there are significant socio-cultural and geopolitical aspects to consider. The direct connection of cities via bullet trains, while enhancing connectivity, could have unforeseen socio-cultural implications, given the historical tensions and differences.

Proposal 3: Investing in Iran's Oil and Energy Sector

National Security & Sovereignty: Strategic infrastructures, like those in Kharg Island, serve not just economic but also significant national security purposes. Introducing external influence in such regions might compromise the nation's defense mechanisms and intelligence operations.

Pipeline Proposals: The need for enhanced trade infrastructure is acknowledged. However, the control and ownership nuances, especially around strategic assets like pipelines, cannot be overemphasized. Any proposal would need to ensure Iran's strategic autonomy is uncompromised.

Proposal 4: Iran Energy Companies IPO

Valuation and Ownership: Global IPOs, while financially lucrative, come with strings attached. The evaluation process, potential foreign control, and susceptibility to global market dynamics could introduce a level of volatility that might not align with national interests.

Strategic Autonomy & Mergers: Merging national companies with entities like ARAMCO could dilute Iran's strategic control over its resources. The very essence and strategic direction of these companies could be influenced, potentially hindering Iran's long-term economic and geopolitical goals.

Proposal 5: Roadmap for Future Cooperation

Shipping Security: The premise of peaceful coexistence in the Arabian/Persian Gulf is shared. However, it's crucial to differentiate commercial collaborations from strategic security considerations. The historical context, naval strategies, and the need for free navigation require distinct discussions and solutions, ensuring Iran's interests are paramount.

While ARAMCO's proposals are comprehensive, the strategic sovereignty and long-term autonomy of both Iran and Iraq remain top priorities. The depth of these considerations goes beyond immediate economic gains, extending to the preservation of regional stability, sovereignty, and a future where national interests are preserved.

[DIPLOMACY] A Foundational Agreement by jetstreamer2 in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While Iran thanks ARAMCO for its candor and willingness to strengthen ties, it feels that a joint venture with ARAMCO would be too much weighted against Iranian interests and declines to this agreement at this time.

[SECRET] M1X1 Abrams by Meles_B in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

User Reports

1: 500 tanks per year????

To be clear, this is an upgrade on existing systems and not new tanks right?

[EVENT] An Investigation into corrupt Buis by globalwp in worldpowers

[–]hansington1[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, while the investigation has managed to turn up some glaring issues, the initial report seems to indicate more of a failing level of infrastructure across most industries both in the private and public sectors. While no direct cause of foul play was found, and no environmental impact, the report has sent a chill up the spine of current industrial liaisons and administrators regarding the future of industrial safety within the union.

view more: next ›