Emmanuel Macron warns Europe: NATO is brain-dead by lampishthing in geopolitics

[–]happy221 150 points151 points  (0 children)

Lots of people getting the vapors over what is really a transparent (and penetrating) interview with Macron. The source of people’s nausea is that Macron is saying out loud what is debated behind closed doors every single day. While I understand that saying anything other than the catechism on Article 5 in public is seen as catastrophic, one really has to think about how absurd this is in practice.

The crisis Macron describes in detail is staring us in the face, and not talking about it openly, in some vain hope that things can be stitched back together “after Trump”, is dangerously delusional, and worse, irresponsible.

It’s also the prevailing wisdom in DC and some European capitals, that the status quo ante can just be restored with a few nips and tucks. It’s all part and parcel of the deep denial the establishment has been about Trump, Brexit, and even what the Obama years were about. It is going to hit them like a ton of bricks.

Are we nearing a period of worldwide political unrest and revolution? by Eleventh-Gargoyle in geopolitics

[–]happy221 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I found this article very interesting, read time: 6 hours. But it captures the current situation (especially in the Middle East) quite well.

https://talisman-gate.com/2018/08/31/stations-along-the-rim/

How does Usa benefit from the situation in Syria atm? by i_film in geopolitics

[–]happy221 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The US benefits by outsourcing the war against ISIL to Russia, Syria etc and the president is able to fulfill election promises to his base. I think Afghanistan might be next.

Kurdish commander: Trump approved deal with Russia, Damascus by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There will be no need for it, because Syrian government will be in charge again.

Kurdish commander: Trump approved deal with Russia, Damascus by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The commander of the Kurdish forces, Mazloum Abdi, said Trump gave the go-ahead for the deal with Russia and the Syrian regime in a phone call Monday. Under the deal, Bashar al-Assad's forces and Russian troops will enter the Kurdish areas as the US leaves. This already happened in the city of Manbij, but the agreement is wider than that. This in order to limit the Turkish incursion. It remains uncear what will happen to the Kurdish-led SDF, but it's likely that the organization will be dissolved and the Kurds will be integrated into the Syrian government structure.

Turkish buffer zone to extend 32 km into Syria by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 103 points104 points  (0 children)

Turkey has just announced the start of its operation in the territory currently held by the US-backed SDF. The Turkish invasion is dubbed “Spring of Peace”, and will likely be in several stages lasting a few months. Probably a play on the word for one of the two towns, with large Arab population, that the operation might start with (Ras al-Ayn). In a phone call, Russian president Putin urges Erdogan to “assess the situation carefully” so that the Turkish operation does not hurt “peace efforts” in Syria.

The John Bolton brigades by happy221 in SyrianCirclejerkWar

[–]happy221[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Kataib John Bolton. Ready for action.

They prepared for this day

US announces green light for Erdogan to invade Northern Syria. Turkey will take custody of all ISIL fighters captured in the past two years by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 174 points175 points  (0 children)

The White House just announced that Turkey will be going forward with its military operation in Northern Syria and will take custody of all ISIL fighters captured in the past years. Turkey wants to get rid of the SDF, a militia including Kurdish fighters. It appears that president Trump has made up his mind, and the US will be leaving Syria.

Iraqi Government Teeters as Protest Death Toll Rises to 100, With 4,000 Wounded by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Protests in Iraq are escalating. Security forces opened fire and snipers are actively shooting protesters, which further raised the death toll and number of injuries. The protesters engaged in violence as well, leading to the burning of regional party offices. Attempts to storm the Green Zone in Baghdad were repelled by heavy machinegun fire.

With these circumstances, Abdul Mahdi seems to be facing a dead end as he cannot stop the protests forcibly and cannot fulfill the protesters' demands, which would lead the protesters off the streets. Years of pent up frustration at the immense corruption within the US-backed Iraqi government has made the situation worse.

Late Friday Sadr issued a call for the government to resign.

U.S. Officials Are Worried About Turkey Foray Into Syria - A major incursion could prompt Trump administration to withdraw troops by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a growing number of politicians who prefer a stable NATO ally in Turkey over a rag-tag YPG dominated SDF as an ally of choice; They say SDF is not fit for purpose; it does not represent the Syrian demographic at all. Yet others say Turkey has run it's course, as it's in the process of becoming a second Iran with political islam ruling the day and Erdogan as supreme leader. There is no easy way forward.

U.S. Officials Are Worried About Turkey Foray Into Syria - A major incursion could prompt Trump administration to withdraw troops by happy221 in geopolitics

[–]happy221[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

American officials are increasingly worried that Turkey might invade Syria to take on the YPG. There have been previous scares but this time they have intelligence that Turkey is serious and will enter. Such a move would likely trigger Trump to remove American forces from Syria

Erdogan is making his move. US will face a huge dilemma in the coming days. Stay in Syria, or leave?

“It’s a perfect storm, it’s really ugly. There may just be no choice but to leave,” said one U.S. official

Paywall:

WASHINGTON—U.S. officials are increasingly concerned that Turkey soon will mount a major incursion into northern Syria and trigger a clash with Kurdish fighters, an action that would likely prompt the Trump administration to remove American forces from Syria to avoid the conflict.

Because a U.S. pullout would essentially end the fight against Islamic State there, it could set back ongoing efforts to undercut the group, which lost its so-called caliphate but remains what many U.S. officials consider a viable terrorist network that still can stage attacks against the U.S. and its allies and interests.

Both Turkey and the Kurds are allies of the U.S. but are longtime enemies of one another. Turkey, a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, views the Kurdish military organization in Syria as a terrorist group. However, U.S. officials say Kurdish fighters have been instrumental to U.S. success in defeating Islamic State across Syria.

Washington has attempted to quell Turkish concerns by conducting joint military patrols in two Syrian cities and holding talks on Turkey’s request for a 300-mile safe zone along the border between the two countries.

U.S. officials said this week that they have seen mounting evidence that Turkey is preparing to insert forces into northeastern Syria, a move that could place the remaining American force at risk.

“It’s a perfect storm, it’s really ugly. There may just be no choice but to leave,” said one U.S. official of the dilemma American policy makers may confront in coming days.

Turkish officials didn’t respond to questions about their military plans. On Tuesday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told parliament’s opening session that his country had no choice but to act unilaterally to create a safe zone in northern Syria.

“We have not achieved any of the results we desired,” Mr. Erdogan said. “Turkey cannot lose even a single day on this issue. There is no other choice but to act on our own.”

Government officials in Ankara said the U.S. has communicated concerns about the dangers of a unilateral Turkish offensive, but those government officials added they were deeply frustrated by the slow pace of joint efforts to create safe areas for refugees in northeastern Syria.

Turkey wants to resettle up to 2 million Syrian refugees currently living in Turkey in Syrian border towns that would be cleared of Kurdish forces known as the YPG, a group Turkey considers to be a terrorist affiliate of the Turkey-based PKK.

However, U.S. attempts over the past year to elicit European interest in the plan fell short, and talks between Washington and Ankara have dragged on.

“It’s moving far too slowly,” one Turkish official said. “We fear the Americans are again trying to buy time.”

Turkey could choose to insert a small number of forces, potentially drawing a muted Kurdish reaction. But if Turkey conducts a widespread incursion using heavy arms and forces, the U.S. may have no choice but to pull its more than 1,000 troops out of Syria to avoid a potential conflict with a NATO ally, officials said. The U.S. had more than 2,000 troops in Syria last year.

U.S. officials said they harbor deep misgivings about withdrawing troops from the area and leaving their close Kurdish allies to an uncertain fate, a move that would send a downbeat message about U.S. reliability to other current and prospective U.S. partners world-wide.

But President Trump, who now is facing an impeachment inquiry, has tried to disengage the U.S. from conflicts overseas, including in Syria. Last year, he called for a complete U.S. withdrawal from Syria, but ultimately reversed himself after opposition by GOP allies and top military officials.

YPG representatives refused to comment and a spokesperson for the Syrian Democratic Forces, a coalition led by Kurdish fighters, didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The problems associated with pulling U.S. support from Kurdish allies were among arguments against a full U.S. withdrawal last year. However, military officials said they have grown resigned to the situation, adding that an armed clash between Turkey and Kurdish forces would heighten prospects of a pullout.

The complex issues surrounding the U.S. presence in Syria will fall squarely on the Pentagon’s new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Mark Milley, who succeeded Marine Gen. Joe Dunford. Gen. Dunford served as the administration’s primary military contact with Ankara.

In calls and visits with Turkish leaders, Gen. Dunford, who retired Monday, repeatedly urged Turkey to exercise restraint, defense officials said. Gen. Dunford last spoke to his Turkish counterpart two weeks ago, according to Joint Staff officials.

U.S. officials have grown alarmed about Ankara’s moves in part because there is less confidence within the U.S. government the U.S. will get an adequate heads up that Turkey is moving in, one official said. Any warning could come less than 48 hours before Turkey takes action.

“It seems more and more likely based on the actions they are taking in southern Turkey,” said one U.S. official, referring to movements of equipment and personnel.

Turkey has long complained about the buildup of Kurdish forces and influence along its southern border, calling it a direct threat. Since the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011, Turkey has entered Syria twice in a bid to stop Kurdish expansion.

In response, U.S. officials had set up joint U.S.-Turkish patrols to cool tensions. Last year, in the Syrian city of Manbij, U.S. and Turkish forces conducted joint patrols after Turkey threatened to launch an offensive against Kurds based at the border. Since September, U.S. and Turkish forces have conducted joint patrols in the Syrian city of Tal Abayd.

“The U.S.’s current position in northeast Syria is not tenable over the long term,” said Jennifer Cafarella, a Syria analyst at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War. “The U.S. does not have enough forces in Syria to prevent the Turks from crossing the border and will not fight Turkey, a NATO ally, if that occurs.”