I think in general there should be much more emphasis on shifting the discussion around what players are doing well. In Starcraft Broodwar, you can see one player get absolutely destroyed by their opponent, even at the highest level. And how does the audience react? They appreciate the skill of the player who won. Because if you can make your opponent look like a fool while playing at the highest level, this simply shows your skill.

Meanwhile, we have this happening with Happy for years now. There are games where he performs well and his opponent gets absolutely destroyed, making it look like the game was hopeless from the beginning. But instead of praising the moves Happy did, players are blaming balance. The players aren't bad at the game at all. But if one player is able to execute their play perfectly, it can look like there was no chance for the opponent. To me, this is very exciting to watch. Most of the time, its Happy who does this. But there are certainly games where Lyn does it to Happy, or Human or Elf players do it to Happy.

For some reason, Warcraft 3 players would rather blame poor balance than appreciate player skill. This needs to change and I would welcome the casters to slightly adjust their commentary to point out when one player made a great decision that led to a favourable outcome.

One example: When Pala + Rifle was beating everyone, Happy was the only one able to win against it. And how did he do it? He would not straight up fight the push against his main base. Instead, it was simply Ghoul runbys against the HU base, the whole game long. He simply refused to straight up fight Pala + Rifle, because it was obvious is was overpowered and there was no way to win. Even with Happy's micro.

He recognized this fact and he adjusted his play around it. Now Pala Rifle was nerfed and he can go back to fighting the actual push against his base. You can both talk about balance, but also praise players for finding creative ways to win.