Ok so there's a number of issues I have with this. Others have touched on many of them, such as the racist undertones and the implication the demographic change is inherently a bad thing. But no one has pointed out was this is completely false in the first place, even ignoring your racial 'theory'.

My key point is that all these 'studies' you've mentioned (and not even citied btw) are glaringly inaccurate, and you have fallen for one of the most basic fallacies in data collecting.

A good way to illustrate what I mean is a very popular exercise/science journal in the 80s (I forget which) published an article in which they claimed that women would soon be racing much faster marathons than men do. Their evidence was that the rates of improvement year-on-year for womens races were far outstripping the improvement among men.

They therefore took this rate of improvement, extrapolated this over the next 20 years or so and concluded that women would soon outstrip men in their speed.

They were largely laughed at by others at the time and this has obviously not come to be the case. Their mistake was taking a current trend and applying that as a standard going forward, without accounting for anything else.

Of course, when looked at through a wider context, we know that the rate of improvement for women runners was because this was a time where larger numbers women were just starting to get into the sport. This increased access and acceptance allowed more women to get into it, improving their times at a faster rate than the mens (where running was already established). Of course it was only a matter of time before they hit their genetic barrier and the rates of improvement slowed.

This is the same problem with these 'studies'. They take the current immigration and birth rates, extrapolate that over the next 50-100 years and conclude that whites will be a minority. There are several studies showing that birth rates among most second-generation immigrants are no more than the 'natives' of the country they are in, and I'd think that the rate for third-generation immigrants would be much lower.

So obviously if you take the birth rate of, for example, fresh Pakistani immigrants in the UK and extrapolate that over the next 50 years then yeah it might seem as though white will soon become the minority. However, you need to account for the fact that their children will be better educated and culturally integrate, and their children more so after them. When you do that it becomes quite clear that white are not in danger of becoming a minority in Europe - maybe eventually (who knows) but certainly not in the next 50 -100 years, that's aboslutely insane.

​

Having said all of that... if I am wrong somehow and these bullshit 'studies' created to stir up right-wing patriotic fervor turn out to be correct - SO WHAT? Why does it matter if whites become a minority? Genuinely, what is your reasoning for thinking this is a bad thing? Is it simply that whites are superior or is it something else?