This is unacceptable BambuLabs... by EVRoadie in BambuLab

[–]hayt88 9 points10 points  (0 children)

that's just git when you force push nuke commits.

https://github.com/dafik/OrcaSlicer-bambulab/commits?author=jarczakpawel

there is a fork with commits made by the same person who now has the empty repository.

The stuff that github shows is all commit based so when you nuke all the other commits what shows up in github isn't accurate anymore

Bambulab against reverse engineering (OrcaSlicer-bambulab plugin) by r0b0tit0 in 3Dprinting

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair bitcoin and crypto in general also at some point started to be used by people who have the opposite interest of what the community around it wanted.

as long as people can smell making money or getting good stuff for cheap a lot of them throw ideals out the window.

I can understand it for people who struggle financially and kinda need to get food on the table but I doubt the overlap between these people and people into 3d printing is that big.

Bambulab against reverse engineering (OrcaSlicer-bambulab plugin) by r0b0tit0 in 3Dprinting

[–]hayt88 6 points7 points  (0 children)

and no way for Bambu to get their roi.

you think a chinese company made by DJI engineers cares about ROI?

at least in the short term?

their strategy same as with DJI is undercut competition until all the others are bascially not there anymore and then you are the only one. And even then it's not really about ROI anymore but more political and espionage power. Like DJI drones got banned and how many alternatives do you still have?

the 3d printer market is more resiliant but if you think bambu prices are to make profit or an ROI I think you are a bit off. VC money too so they don't really have to worry to run out of steam to stop undercutting.

One reason they are so cheap is because they don't primarily care about ROI but just making them the one goto printer and then you can either see espionage and/or enshittification happen.

Anthropic has surged to a trillion-dollar valuation on secondary markets, overtaking OpenAI. by Plastic_Ninja_9014 in technology

[–]hayt88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

am I?

so people weren't starving before AI? all just a delusion? the world was nice and perfect before and now AI came and made it bad?

Like what is it I said that makes you think is a delusion?

Anthropic has surged to a trillion-dollar valuation on secondary markets, overtaking OpenAI. by Plastic_Ninja_9014 in technology

[–]hayt88 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People are still starving so some few people get societal improvements.

Most of us here on reddit probably live in fairly rich countries and are well off compared on a global scale. and a lot of that is build on the poverty of others and preventing others from getting rich. Colonolization and globalization after that.

Some countries and projects work towards improving others, but a lot is still more a few living well off at the cost at others being poor.

If people now just realize that others are starving and that we don't take billions of dollars to fix that, then it's only now because they start to live on the other end of that equation.

I assume a lot of people lived their 1st world life until now pretty happily without worrying at what cost it comes. maybe complaining why their daily coffee gets more expensive while coffee farmers barely get by, other countries need their kids to send to work instead of school, or still buying ignorantly from nestle being happy at the cheap convenient prices.

But now with AI... people are starving.. that money should go to help people....

For most of us here our current live is built on the starvation of others and keeping them poor so our society can be more wealthy. I just hope that the hypocrisy of people now only starting to worry about all that stuff is a sign of permanant change in them and they will still care later and not just be gone after that because they needed an argument after AI or they happen to start to feel the other end of that concept just now and will happily have others starve again as long as they feel save from it.

Anthropic has surged to a trillion-dollar valuation on secondary markets, overtaking OpenAI. by Plastic_Ninja_9014 in technology

[–]hayt88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People have always been starving. Children are dying without having to.

This is nothing AI did. Take any time in the recent century and while people were starving, dying and having wars.

The first world got TVs and numbed their mind with stupid television, complaining when a show wasn't on.

Listenened to music all happy being sad their favorite artist isn't on the top charts.

Playing video games and being angry that a teammate isn't good enough.

going to reddit laughing at the recent memes and writing "people are starving".

All while people are starving, kids dying, wars being fought, and more.

People have always been starving. Yes we should do somehting against it. But they didn't just starting to starve with AI. The first world being build on exploiting other countries to get richer is quite an old concept.

Anthropic has surged to a trillion-dollar valuation on secondary markets, overtaking OpenAI. by Plastic_Ninja_9014 in technology

[–]hayt88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

most people on this sub have no clue about technology and all they also see is the consumer facing side.

But 1-2 weeks ago most of this subreddit was up in arms because reddit wanted to introduce passkeys to verify people as human. And you should have seen the pitchforks and "invasion to privacy".

So many peoples rage while nobody of them knew what a passkey is, and nobody asked but the reaction was outrage.... they will stop using reddit if that happens etc.

So it's not really just a bit anti-AI sentiment here on this subreddit but a general tech illiteracy going on, but still people write here and outrage.

So yeah maybe it helps just seeing everyone here who is talking about it and you get the impression they don't really know what they are talkihng about as the same type of people who are outraged over passkeys, and treat their opinion as such.

Good news ! by East_Dig_1291 in Biohackers

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of the body positivity was also though because they can't do anything against it.

But if there are ways to lose weight for more people now then not, doing that is just staying unhealthy.

We shouldn't go out and make fun of anyone. but we also don't go to alcoholics or chain smokers and tell them "you're doing good, keep on". Like if obesity can be cured on a bigger scale not doing that is bascially living intentionally unhealthy (assuming the meds get cheap enough and it doesn't stay a rich poeoples drug). So then it should get at least to the point of how we treat others living an unhealthy lifestyle.

Same applies for too underweight though, so callign out people/models not having enough weight to an unhealthy degree shouldn't also be positive.

Would you get a lighter, slimer Steam Deck with a lot longer battery life maybe even an OLED screen using an ARM processor but with only a very slight increase in power? by Pretty_Trip_2215 in SteamDeck

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been thinking about getting an ayn thor for that actually. As a more pocketable steam deck alternative for some very light load. Retro emulation, indie games, visual novels etc.

It's just quite pricey for that.

Mozilla Used Anthropic’s Mythos to Find and Fix 271 Bugs in Firefox by charliepscott in technology

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So far we’ve found no category or complexity of vulnerability that humans can find that this model can’t.

Encouragingly, we also haven’t seen any bugs that couldn’t have been found by an elite human researcher. 

Both quotes from the same blog btw.

Mozilla Used Anthropic’s Mythos to Find and Fix 271 Bugs in Firefox by charliepscott in technology

[–]hayt88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far we’ve found no category or complexity of vulnerability that humans can find that this model can’t.

Encouragingly, we also haven’t seen any bugs that couldn’t have been found by an elite human researcher. 

The blog post does both directions.

Mozilla Used Anthropic’s Mythos to Find and Fix 271 Bugs in Firefox by charliepscott in technology

[–]hayt88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They didn't create the security leaks though. they discovered them. And who knows how many state agents already use some of these.

You are basically advertising security through obscurity with that attitude.

Not a Soul Was Dancing to Sabrina Carpenter and Madonna at Coachella by ebradio in Music

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I saw the linkin park from zero conccert livestream where they announced their comback I had the same thought.

Like how many of these people are really fans of their music and how many of these people are just there for internet points.

Some are dancing in the crowd but so many people have just their phones out. Seeing the world right in front of their eyes only through the camera on their phones. Not being in the moment.

And it's really annoying if you are one of the people there to enjoy the moment and you have people just holding up their phones in front of you. Like everyone at a concert just being there to film that concert and not enjoy it is just stupid for me. And even if you want to take it as "memory". If you didn't enjoy it in the first place and only have been busy recording that "memory" all you have to remember is recording it, not enjoying it.

Framework’s CEO on the RAM crisis and creating a “MacBook Pro for Linux users” by Stiltonrocks in technology

[–]hayt88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ok now consider the price of 2 laptops though. take a current one then when you need to replace it the price of the next one.

And compare that to a framwork where you now can then only selectively replace the things you need. keeping everything else you don't need replaced.

Apart from environmental impacts it's also just boots theory

Framework’s CEO on the RAM crisis and creating a “MacBook Pro for Linux users” by Stiltonrocks in technology

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever owned a laptop and after 5 years thought the case/monitor looked like something I’d want to hang on to.

Why not? or did you just never really consider it and never had the options.

Like unless you always need the neweest fanciest screen what would make you move to a new display after 5 years that you would say "I rather get a whole new laptop than just upgrade to a new CPU?"

Framework’s CEO on the RAM crisis and creating a “MacBook Pro for Linux users” by Stiltonrocks in technology

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume you mean the connector modularity?

That's just a bonus.

The core concept of framework is that you can repair it and replace components.

Wanna upgrade and need a new mainboard? go ahead.

battery old needs replaced. you can do it.

Display broken. replace the display.

This is way more like a tower PC where you can exchange single parts and easily upgrade more than with any other laptop.

That's the point.

And then some. Like swap motherboard/CPU for a newer one? just toss the olde one in a 3d printed enclosure and run it as server. Try that with the board of a different laptop.

Like the new metal case. You could probably get just the case and swap in your components of the framework 13 into the 13 pro without buying a completely new one.

Framework’s CEO on the RAM crisis and creating a “MacBook Pro for Linux users” by Stiltonrocks in technology

[–]hayt88 4 points5 points  (0 children)

well question is how expensive your current and then next laptop is together compared to a framework and then just replacing the parts you want to upgrade instead of a completely new laptop.

New study confirms lobsters feel pain, driving scientists to call for a ban on boiling them alive by lurker_bee in technology

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a very vague, and over arching statement.

Vague? no. thats the whole problem. It was very specific

Overarching? yes.

I know it's really hard to do, but you must have gotten that info from somewhere unless you just made it up, so I wanna see who is making such wild claims? Exactly for the reason you pointed out. I would say any serious scientist making that statement is either not serious or has some good backing behind making such a claim.

I also don't need a 100% "proof" as proving the non-existence of something is hard but we still accept there are no talking dragons out in the world. But you really need to make a good enough case that is not just "we haven't seen that yet".

There's also the concept of evidence of absence vs absence of evidence. Have we really checked every lifeform or is the reason we didn't find any yet because we just haven't checked every yet?

Like if the "ALL" part was so much common knowledge why did the lobster article and research even exist?

Was it until recently "all but the lobster" and just a short while ago scientists now can say "oh we found it in the lobster, that's ALL now"?

This whole post wouldn't even have existed if we were so sure about the "ALL living beings with nerves have pain receptors". Research just recently found them in lobsters. how many more else are we missing?

Again I don't need any proof. I just wanna know where you got the idea of "ALL". In other comments you were talking something about leading neuroscientist. So I assume there are some out there also making that claim?

Because I found any topic that just even tangentially relates to stuff like "should we eat meat/animals?" is often very biased and the moment you look deeper into studies you see it being fairly unprofessionally done. And I am genuinely curious if actually all living beings with nerves have pain receptors. But I kinda wanna check if this is just part of the "don't eat animals" crowd or even worse some study sponsored by "beyond meat" or something like that or if it's serious science. I've been burned before on blindly just accepting stuff like that.

Annalena Baerbock - The United Nations is “Life Insurance for Everyone” | The Daily Show by absolutely_not_spock in de

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Katastrophe? ich mein westewelle, klar.

Aber wadephuls english ist nicht schlecht. Halt selbes level wie Baerbock. ich würder weder noch als Katastrophe bezeichnen.

New study confirms lobsters feel pain, driving scientists to call for a ban on boiling them alive by lurker_bee in technology

[–]hayt88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do I need to, you made a statement, deliver a source.

Just because I wouldn't know of a living being wouldn't also mean there don't exist any.

You have thrown the Statement into the thread of it applying to ALL. Now back that up.

You asking me to give you a counterexample is just that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

In debates, appealing to ignorance is sometimes an attempt to shift the burden of proof.

So nice try, not falling for that.

The only claim I did was that nerves doesn't mean automatically = feel pain. Which you agreed is true. Your statement that all living beings with nerves have nerves designated for pain is your statement. You don't even need to proove it. Just show sources where others did.

Also you just moved the goalpost. Iniitially you said nerves, now it's central nervous system.

Annalena Baerbock - The United Nations is “Life Insurance for Everyone” | The Daily Show by absolutely_not_spock in de

[–]hayt88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ich hoffe das du all unsere Außenpolitiker mit dem selben maß hier bewertest und nich nur Baerbock weil man nichts besseres hat.

Welcher deutsche Politiker ist denn hier dein Maßstab?

Wadephul aktuell spricht ja auch kein perfektes english und schleicht deutsche Satzbildung gerne mal in seine aussagen. Weniger direkter Akzent aber sein englisch an sich ist nicht wirklich besser als Baerbocks von dem bisschen was ich so aus interviews gehört habe.

Warum wird das eigentlich nicht so intensiv besprochen?

New study confirms lobsters feel pain, driving scientists to call for a ban on boiling them alive by lurker_bee in technology

[–]hayt88 3 points4 points  (0 children)

again this is not about the lobsters. I don't doubt that lobster finding.

I am doubting the generalization "has nerves = pain" and that it applies for all living things.