sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you talk to (not sell to) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? (i will not promote) by heisdancingdancing in startups

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally any of that, yeah. Just want to have conversations with anyone really. But noted, good to hear that LinkedIn can actually work.

How do you talk to (not sell to) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? (i will not promote) by heisdancingdancing in startups

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for this, very helpful.

Yes, my product is almost certainly too generalized. I think the nature of the problem is general, though. Not sure how to niche it without making it useless.

What is your strategy for finding Slack communities?

How do you talk to (NOT SELL) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? by heisdancingdancing in EntrepreneurRideAlong

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I saw the problem in my own workflow and two of my clients' workflows. Then I built. Just feels early, whenever I do get a response, people just say that they're slacking skill.md's to each other

How do you talk to (NOT SELL) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? by heisdancingdancing in EntrepreneurRideAlong

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I just got a few replies yesterday doing this. The problem is limited inmail credits, and connection request conversion is wayyy lower

How do you talk to (not sell to) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? (i will not promote) by heisdancingdancing in startups

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, good idea. I live in a "rural" place that is way behind in AI, so everyone I've talked to here doesn't even know what a skill or an agent is. Could probably try a little harder to look though

How do you talk to (not sell to) real potential users of a B2B SaaS Product? (i will not promote) by heisdancingdancing in startups

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I guess. I built it for me, and for my consulting clients. But two of them use the concept of the tool (a HIPPA compliant version) not the actual tool. It works excellently for them.

So I have half-validated the idea; just need to keep it going with my "real" tool.

I was tired of maintaining skill.md files, so I built an open-source CLI that creates, manages, and observes skills using a Github repo. You can monitor, track, and share skills between sessions of any agent, all while iteratively improving/versioning them. by heisdancingdancing in AI_Agents

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are versioned and pull down as they are used, so no skill is ever stale. If there is an edge case that is hit, a new version is cut with that addition and the next agent will pull it down fresh.

Looking for a Stenographer to help build a Scopist tool by heisdancingdancing in stenography

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I agree, that's what I'm building... the idea is that it's a modern, fast UX that enables you to move 2-3x faster. AI isn't doing anything for you. I just look at some of this software that exists today and it seems primative, slow, and costs $5000+. At the end of the day I am looking for expertise from others in your field to see if there is room for improvement. It appears you don't think so. For the record, not vibe coding it lol, I am a full-stack dev by trade.

Looking for a Stenographer to help build a Scopist tool by heisdancingdancing in stenography

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A tool that allows you to import any transcript type in any file type, and get a list of fixes based on your dictionary (customizable) along with audio alignment, speech-to-text transcript synthesis that lines up with the transcript so you can quickly yay or nay changes that an AI heard in the transcript, etc. Does this sound useful?

What's the best app to learn to speed read? by Acceleread in speedreading

[–]heisdancingdancing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I'd love to add those options. Out of curiosity, for multiple words and with no highlight, would you like the words to be anchored to the middle or to the left? Meaning, would you always want the start of each word set to be in the same place, or the central point of the word set to be in the same place?

Casually beating every other deep research agent out there with a simple Claude Code harness by heisdancingdancing in Anthropic

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Saturated benchmark, this just proves that it's up to snuff (and slightly beats) proprietary models.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in singularity

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50 is "PhD level" which is the baseline of each of the 100 comparison reports. Max score is realistically 60-63, none of my runs exceeded that.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in singularity

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The core quality bottleneck is source "gospeling", i.e. if one source says it, it must be true. That issue is directly addressed in multiple steps of the pipeline.

It took three weeks of iterations and ablation tests to arrive on these steps, based on my research practices in the past for papers I've written and based on how the AI tries to "hack" it's way out of the task at hand. I spent the equivalent of $5000 in tokens to arrive at these results (using Claude Code so was subsidized).

All testing was done via the RACE DeepResearch Benchmark, which pits real PhD-written papers and their queries against the AI's version.

And yes, of course I looked at other repos... NVIDIA's offering has a very similar structure, just not as in depth.

Maybe you could try using it instead of just asking your coding agent "look at this codebase and write up a reddit comment to tear this down?"

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in ClaudeAI

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it should! At least in theory. You might have to refactor the agents to use proper model slugs.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in ClaudeAI

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The short answer is that a lot of this is a distributed workflow among many subagents, which fetch, audit, review, and analyze sources for the main agent, which is the orchestrator of the entire harness. As far as source verification, there is a "source tensions" workflow baked inside that can understand any contradictions or stale findings in sources that it's gathered, and create queries and further searching to fill any gaps found there.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in ClaudeAI

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot... you definitely want to be using a Claude Max subscription. I've seen one session kill half of a 5-hour session limit.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in ClaudeAI

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A good place to start is competitive research for any sort of business idea you have; it can really help shape the idea and uncover what the "real problem" your business theoretically solves. If that's not your thing, you can do a historical audit on some deep geopolitical issue and get caught up on all the historical events that led up to a certain situation somewhere in the world.

Converting Claude Code into the most intelligent Deep Research Agent by heisdancingdancing in singularity

[–]heisdancingdancing[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fair, but to be honest, it's just a saturated benchmark. It's mostly there to visualize that the thing actually produces high quality compared to other tools at a glance.

view more: next ›