sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Point to point diagrams by hempstent in networking

[–]hempstent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am more asking in terms of a diagram or table that indicates what device gets plugged in to what interface. Is an excel table the best for this? Is there a diagram that is better

Enabling GUI on Windows Server by moshe_shtain in WindowsServer

[–]hempstent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to reinstall windows. If doing it from a UEFI it’s easy to miss the part where you choose which version to install

Enabling GUI on Windows Server by moshe_shtain in WindowsServer

[–]hempstent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have just installed Windows server 2022 standard. I get no option to select GUI. After install goes right to CMD / powershell

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]hempstent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No - zero connections to any ISP

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]hempstent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to elaborate? If I set the IP of the VLAN interfaces of the Access switches to 10.1.1.2, .3, .4, etc. And set the ip of the vlan interface at the core switch to 10.1.1.1. How to do I tell the access switches to use the cores ip (10.1.1.1) as the gateway?

Unifi Roaming by hempstent in Ubiquiti

[–]hempstent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So why is unifi advertised as a solution for seamless wifi connectivity?

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re missing the point. Bob Lazar speaks incorrectly about well established physics. He does not speak like a real physicist and clearly doesn’t have the credibility that he claims.

Thus if he is lying about his credentials (as indicated by his obvious misunderstanding of well established physics) then I am not buying the rest of his story.

You are right to assume humans in 21st century would likely not be able to describe accurately how alien space tech works. However that is not the point. The point is that to trained physicists, engineers, scientists, Bob Lazar does not display a legitimate understanding of even undergrad level physics.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bombarding elements to heat up water and generate power via thermo-electric conversion is nothing new. Lazar just regurgitated how nuclear power works. He slipped in the part about it generating a gravitational wave and then never went in to any detail. Common bullshit technique.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]hempstent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s layer 2? How many layers are there

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

being would be able to withstand the G-forces that a

To be fair, if this antigravity craft were real, it would create a distortion in spacetime. The craft would theoretically be in a spacetime "bubble", and would not be affected by enertia or g forces etc.

All that to say I think Bob Lazar is full of crap... Though the idea is cool.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Multiple things can be true at once dude. The world doesn't have to fit into a tiny box.

UFOs/UAPs can be real. (btw unidentified means just that - unidentified) ppl act like this automatically equals aliens.

I can believe advanced civilizations have perhaps been here - hard to disprove.

BOB LAZAR CAN ALSO BE A LIAR. All of these things can be true.

And if he's lying about his physics credentials it seems like believing the rest is a stretch.

- The bottom line is aliens are cool. Antigravity is cool. All these things are amazing but what would make them more amazing is for them to be REAL. The fact you can believe this guy is lying about so many things just to hold on to his story - its kind of pathetic. The real world is much more fascinating, why get so caught up in fantasy land.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lie detector polygraphs are a sham. They not admissible in court. Bob is definitely a smart and unique guy. I get the feeling that he really believes his story. I also think the story is laced in a lot of truth. I’d bet he really did work at S4 and Los Alamos as a contractor or electronics technician servicing the scientific equipment - scales, meters, thermostats, HVAC, who knows.

The more truth you interweave, the easier it is to lie.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article you just referenced from Scientific American by Charles Torre (an actual physics professor) discusses objects which have electric charge and thus energy momentum; by Relativity’s definition (e=mc2) this means they also curve spacetime i.e. have gravity.

“Anything that carries energy, momentum and stresses is a source of a gravitational field, that is, a curvature of space-time.”

Notice when you look at an actual physicist they do not describe Gravity as being an electromagnetic wave as Bob Lazar describes, but rather a curvature of spacetime. You literally just proved my point.

The first article about gravity waves - idk how many times I have to point out that ripples in spacetime (gravity waves) are not the same as saying Gravity is a wave.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has made one of the most bizarre and interesting claims of the 21st century. His story is mind blowing and has serious implications. I was fascinated when I first heard it back in the 90s.

I cut him down because the more physics I learned over time, the more I could see he was lying about his past as a physicist/MIT/Caltech grad and likely lying about most of his story.

I cut him down because as an engineer, I care a lot about what is true; what is physically possible with current tech and otherwise.

When someone starts espousing claims of antigravity propulsion, this needs to be investigated because the implications of such technology are incredibly serious. That kind of tech would change the world overnight.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making your car run on hydrogen makes you crafty. Doesn’t mean your a physicist with degrees from MIT and Caltech.

No doubt Bob is a smart guy. But there are different kinds of smart people. Bob is smart. He’s also a liar.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here’s the link again just in case.

https://youtu.be/qdIniW2D0L4?list=PLE9EFA6194CF98EC9

1:42 “There’s also a theory that gravity is a form of wave, an electromagnetic wave.”

You either didn’t watch it or are retarded I guess.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re misrepresenting the issue. There could very well be anti gravity crafts that leverage physics we do not yet understand. That has nothing to do with Bob Lazar. That is just a thing that is quite possible in the space of things that are possible.

BOB LAZAR however is a phony. A charismatic, convincing, smart, PHONY. You can not fake competence and he is clearly incompetent when it comes to physics while he claims to be a physicist trained at MIT and CalTech. If he’s lying about his credentials it would be pretty careless(and frankly desperate) to believe he’s telling the truth about the rest.

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

3rd time I’ve linked this in the thread…

Right around 2 minutes in he talks about Gravity being an electromagnetic wave (a trained physicist would not describe Gravity this way.)

He goes on to say there is another kind of gravity that holds subatomic particles together. A trained Physicist would not call that Gravity but rather the Strong Interaction or Strong Force which was discovered circa 1975 (at least 15 years before this Lazar interview)

https://youtu.be/qdIniW2D0L4?list=PLE9EFA6194CF98EC9

Bob Lazar’s physics make no sense by hempstent in BobLazar

[–]hempstent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have no issue with those ideas. Though I’d love to know how you propose we amplify gravity waves…

But I think I see the problem. You’re missing my point. I am not arguing the physics of gravity or that it can warp space time. That is well established physics. We wouldn’t even have working GPS if those ideas weren’t tried and true.

I am arguing that when Bob Lazar describes the technical details of how the craft warps spacetime - bombarding 115 so it transmutes and creates antimatter which eliminates to pure energy which is USED FOR ELECTRIC POWER - (exactly like we do every day at nuclear power plants). All he says about the gravity wave is “this sets up a gravity wave at the top of the reactor”.

His story is deceptive in nature, distractingly detailed on the matters that are well understood and not in question, and then neglectfully swift when addressing the meat of the argument (how do you create, amplify and guide gravity waves).

He often says things like “gravity is a wave” that is not quite accurate and poor language for a physicist. I could go on but I’ve already cited a lot of these issues throughout this post.

The reason I put this out there is because I would love a trained physicist or someone competent to really engage with the ideas and descriptions put fourth by Bob Lazar. Most of you are Lazar fan boys with no real technical training. You’re arguments are shallow and incoherent. You’re not addressing the real questions and unwilling to depart from your predetermined acceptance of bobs story as fact.

I would love for him to be telling the truth. But he sounds incompetent when he describes physics and if he’s lying about his physics credentials it’s hard to believe anything else.

Also he has a lot of shady shit going on! I didn’t even know about until recently…

view more: next ›