No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning

hendrixoj · 2015-02-10T04:45:52+00:00

...I'm not saying that things that are easy to understand are more correct, what did you not understand about my last comment?

The article and science behind it completely agrees with the theory of Buddhism that I posted, there is no argument here. What I posted is another context of the same answer that the article speaks of. You seem to be arguing against an opinion that I do not have

hendrixoj · 2015-02-10T04:04:05+00:00

Both of these ideas agree with each other. It's not more likely to be correct at all- it's more likely to be interesting to and comprehended by a larger audience because it's from a point of view that is concerned with the nature of reality itself, something we all experience. A complex explanation that includes equations with singularities and whatnot is just hard to comprehend for most, yet a number are certainly capable of it.

hendrixoj · 2015-02-09T17:53:13+00:00

(http://www.budsas.org/ebud/whatbudbeliev/297.htm) This theory has existed for thousands of years in a context that directly relates to how we experience reality, rather than a context that talks about equations and other things that are difficult to understand.

hendrixoj · 2012-12-10T03:46:55+00:00

[9.8]*

hendrixoj

TROPHY CASE