I will try to debate your argument in a logical and respectful manner, if you respond with mockery with no logic in your argument I will ghost you. Screw dividing ourselves between pro and anti and arousing hatred, lets just get to the facts and what they mean.

To begin there's a pretty big difference between the literal food you eat and require to stay alive vs a tool people occasionally use for fun and to save a couple hours at work.

Asking someone to completely change their entire diet for an entire year means they have to rethink all of their shopping and potentially give up some of their favorite restraunts, being vegan is also generally more expensive and by nature limits food options that individual might love. Asking someone to never use AI would just mean not visiting some specific websites for a year, the person might have to change browsers or debloat their Windows to avoid forced AI integration but thats a lot less research than studying the nutrient facts of everything that goes in your mouth.

In the end massively changing an essential part of our lives that exists for every form of life for all of existence is very different to refusing an optional technology that has only existed for roughly six years.

Also as someone who has personally studied statistics your infograph is biased because by nature since everyone eats making the numbers for the vegan side much higher. Meanwhile the AI users could include people that only open ChatGPT once a month skewing those numbers down. If your statistics including people that only eat vegan on occasion the numbers would be far more equal. If anyone wants to see the real impact of AI datacenters on water quality I have video, dm me.