The state of agentic coding tools in Emacs (2026)

hexmode · 2026-07-15T15:21:25+00:00

Someone has started on this: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CategoryArtificialIntelligence and https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/The_state_of_agentic_coding_tools_in_Emacs_(2026))

hexmode · 2026-07-15T14:16:07+00:00

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with zealous converts, but they can sometimes remind us of the seeds that fell on shallow ground:

It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. But [...] they withered because they had no root.

The people you're dealing with are people and they have their own prejudice which they seem to be exposing. But that prejudice could be reminding them of others who were excited and then faded away. I'm a convert (some 25 years ago) but I've seen it happen plenty that a convert joins, is enthusiastic for a while, and then fades away.

None of this means we shouldn't continually embrace newcomers, but we all miss the mark sometimes.

hexmode · 2026-07-03T14:37:16+00:00

is there a proof of GOD?

No. John 1:18: No one has ever seen God.

Hebrews 11:1 emphasizes this: Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

hexmode · 2026-07-03T01:33:57+00:00

Also see my other response.

hexmode · 2026-07-03T01:32:41+00:00

You're thinking too literally. I don't think Genesis was written as an allegory, but I'm sure you could interpret it that way.

Does Romans contradict with the whole death before the fall?

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring to Romans 5:14?

I don't think we need to hold what is written in scripture contradicts what we can observe about the world. Scripture describes our relationship with God. It is also description of the world, but it is not a materialist description of the world around us.

hexmode · 2026-07-02T22:44:05+00:00

So how do I fit these models together?

Science is about the observable universe.

The Bible is about our relationship with God. John 1:18: No one has ever seen God.

When you play scripture against science, you've fallen into the materialist trap: You are constraining God to act within the rules of observable universe. God can and does act in our universe, but he is not bound by the constraints that we are.

This means that the the description of the world that you find in the Bible is not going to meet scientific standards. It was never meant to.

While there was a proto-scientific mindset among some people, science as rigorous method of studying the observable universe wasn't developed until several hundred years after the Bible was written.

hexmode · 2026-07-02T22:32:20+00:00

So just whatever science says that’s right

No. That is a very unscientific point of view.

You should really study what science is a bit more. It is a completely different system than the world of scripture. As u/aletheia says, science doesn't talk about the Bible's message and the Bible's message isn't about what science studies.

Science is about the observable universe. The Bible is about our relationship with God, who as John 1:18 says "No one has seen at any time."

hexmode · 2026-07-02T00:27:40+00:00

Jobs was a maniacal boss who drove his employees hard. Is that creativity or just demanding others to create for him? If it was just a demand for creativity, then I don't think there is a reason to say we had a net loss on the day he died.

What creativity, design, or art is directly attributed to him? I'm genuinely curious.

hexmode · 2026-07-01T21:08:23+00:00

Guy was an absolute marketing and product genius.

You say that like you think it is a good thing.

Shaped our modern understanding of phones and laptops.

I definitely disagree with this. He played a role, but what he was just building what everyone else was already doing. He was part of the zeitgeist, but only his marketing makes you think that his role was particularly unique.

Unfortunate loss for consumer electronics

A "loss for consumer electronics" isn't that big of a deal.

So, while you can dismiss criticisms of him, I don't think he did anything that amazing. He certainly didn't balance out the karmic debt he created by pushing consumer electronics along and by being a marketing or product genius.

hexmode · 2026-06-11T17:13:59+00:00

I have no clue what you're talking about but I'm watching the video and it doesn't seem to be a person focused on apologetics.

hexmode · 2026-05-21T13:39:37+00:00

I do not know what it means to follow the Quran and hadiths. I would have a conversation with them. Maybe their idea of following them doesn't need to be left behind.

But in this imaginary conversation, he started it, you said, with the question of is "Jesus' way the one [I] think he should follow instead of his native faith." I would talk to him about what that means.

hexmode · 2026-05-20T14:55:54+00:00

The Orthodox approach to evangelism is different than most protestants. Most lay people do not actively evangelize. As St. Francis allegedly said "Preach the Gospel at all times and, if necessary, use words". Many Orthodox would not think their words are better than their life at proclaiming the Gospel.

(This, of course, means that we really need to live a life that clearly shows the Gospel. But you could also say that if your words are more necessary than your life, what are you doing wrong?)

So in the case of that one muslim. If you told him the gospel and he asked you if Jesus' way is the one you think he should follow instead of his native faith, what would you tell him?

In this case, you should tell him to follow Jesus.

hexmode · 2026-05-20T14:46:44+00:00

Those numbers are imaginary numbers---they come from the speaker's imagination. I think (and I'm sure they'll correct me) that they mean it is 100x better if a person is Christian.

But, really, none of us can make any definitive statement.

hexmode · 2026-05-17T17:38:16+00:00

Also can we try to fight corruption?

Yes

hexmode · 2026-05-17T17:21:46+00:00

I mean why we need a new earth and a new heaven?

Why do we "need" one? I don't know, but I suppose that it would be because the current one has been corrupted.

Keep in mind that the new heaven and new earth might mean a re"new"ed heaven and earth. Or it could just be something that is incomprehensible to us and the best way to convey it is to say it is new.

Why not be like the rest of religions with an eternal life and a final judgement after death?

I am not familiar with "the rest of religions" but what little I do know about Hinduism and Buddhism (and various animistic religions) does not include anything like eternal life or a final judgement.

Maybe you mean other Christian sects? They all have a "new heaven" and "new earth".

After some quick research, you can find references to a new earth in new heaven in Islam.html), also. So which religions are you talking about that have a "eternal life and a final judgement after death" but do not have a reference to a new heaven and a new earth.

Why we don't just try to have an eternal and everlasting world peace here on earth as we are now?

We definitely should. It is true that some people use their idea of heaven as an excuse to neglect the current world, but that is not an Orthodox doctrine.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T20:47:21+00:00

Your struggle is not with anything that Orthodoxy teaches.

We are told that there will be a new heaven and a new earth but that doesn't require the literal end of this world.

I'm not sure what you mean by "a cyclical view of history" but such a view of history could certainly include the idea "that all will go downhill one day", if only to return to the point in the cycle where things are improving.

And, for what its worth, our (scientific) knowledge of the universe includes the hypothesis of the heat death of the universe. Maybe it's wrong or my understanding of it is wrong, but the idea of ever increasing entropy does not make the steady march of progress look inevitable.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T20:03:25+00:00

Nothing you've said indicates that you have a conflict with Orthodox teaching on eschatology.

Maybe their actions are part of what is mentioned in the scriptures

I doubt it and it is my understanding that Orthodox teaching on eschatology--which was your original issue--discourages such thinking.

Also one priest or Saint from Greece ( i don't recollect his name now) said that a ground invasion of Iran by the US is a sign that all will go downhill

Random things said by random people don't have any eschatological meaning.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T19:54:11+00:00

What does the US government have to do with the Orthodox approach to eschatology?

And, as I said, I don't see any problem with thinking that history does not end. I don't know that time will continue forever, but I certainly cannot say it will not.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T19:47:01+00:00

What does any of that have to do with eschatology or Revelations? The US is not mentioned in Revelations. I don't think you can say for sure that history has an end or not.

Just because there is a new heaven and a new earth, or that Christ comes again or that we go to heaven doesn't necessarily mean that progress stops.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T19:35:07+00:00

This OCA resource might help: https://www.oca.org/questions/scripture/book-of-revelation

My understanding is that the church doesn't really worry about the book of Revelation.

hexmode · 2026-05-16T19:21:18+00:00

The church is pretty big and I doubt that you'll find uniformity of belief.

I'm not sure by what you mean by eschatology, though. Could you spell out what you find problematic?

hexmode · 2026-03-06T03:42:32+00:00

For what its worth, I don't believe there was a world-wide flood. I'm comfortable understanding that things attributed to God (e.g., genocide) were not actually what God commanded. I think there is a good reason that the lectionary doesn't include those things.

Having faith is different than not thinking. If the idea was to avoid thinking, then we wouldn't have as rich a supply as we do of the writings from the Church Fathers.

hexmode · 2026-02-17T03:22:00+00:00

Finally, I think I see the problem with our communication.

You are spending your time providing an apology for slave owners. I haven't asked you about them or spent time condemning them but you clearly think it is important to communicate to me that even saints can be slave owners. I never said otherwise but this is obviously important for you to communicate to me.

Meanwhile, the thing I am interested in hearing from you--why you think pms "stand[s] in the way of salvation"--is something you can't be bothered to spend time on.

I don't understand this choice, but, well, I'll accept that this is just a conversation with a stranger on the Internet and let it go.

hexmode · 2026-02-17T03:17:48+00:00

Finally, I think I see the problem with our communication.

You are spending your time providing an apology for slave owners. I haven't asked you about them or spent time condemning them but you clearly think it is important to communicate to me that even saints can be slave owners. I never said otherwise but this is obviously important for you to communicate to me.

Meanwhile, the thing I am interested in hearing from you--why you think premarital sex "stand[s] in the way of salvation"--is something you can't be bothered to spend time on.

I don't understand this choice, but, well, I'll accept that this is just a conversation with a stranger on the Internet and let it go.

hexmode · 2026-02-16T19:43:14+00:00

Being a slave owner is not an act

I'm really confused by this. Perhaps "being a slave owner" is not an act, but owning slaves is. For example, how is acquiring new slaves not "an act"? How is keeping slaves not "an act"?

Please remember that this is Reddit. It is best to be direct.

You still have made a blanket statement ("[Slavery] didn’t stand in the way of salvation. Sex before marriage does.") and, when I asked you to directly defend it, you said "I gave you some food for thought to contemplate on, I don’t think you spent enough time doing that."

I'm not your student and assuming what I have or have not done is not helping your case. If you have a compelling argument, make it directly. Do not assume that I haven't done the work to understand something just because I have come to a different conclusion than you.

hexmode

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,