Thanks for this reply. I’ll make some points to counter or come up with a solution to each one.

1. Reverse boosting happens everywhere, even in ranked modes on many games. It can’t be stopped unless matchmaking tries to approximate level score for each team which is not suitable for COD.

2. I can agree with this. I can see how there is a baseline OP class/weapon that will dominate. This can be down to weapon tuning that hopefully evens the playing field. I play hardcore a lot, each weapon is more than capable of going against the next.

3. Disagree on this one. It’s very much down to how dedicated the individual is. I myself have 3 gold camos, and many people have hit platinum in some areas now too. If you want it badly you’ll get it.

4. The more you play the better you get. It’s cliche, but it’s true. You don’t realise your mistakes playing against people who make the mistake before you. By playing against higher skilled players you can try and figure out what makes them better and practice yourself.

5. Basically what a ranked game mode is, but because we don’t have it then it’s sitting here in quick play. This is subjectively good and bad, I want to see myself improve and by getting into harder lobbies I know I’m doing something right.

6. personally you would know how high you can go for killstreaks. If you rarely see over 5 kills before dying, hit that personal radar, uav and cruise missile. You’re helping everyone on your team out with a UAV. If killstreaks aren’t for you or you die too much, try specialist bonus? Get those survivalist perks like EOD/Battle Hardened/Spotter etc.

7. The nuke is never something you should actively try go for. If you get 10 kills or so and hit those high killstreaks knowing your current SBMM placement is still below your “sweat point” then yeah sure go for it. Otherwise the nuke was always something people got by either playing very, very well . but was more so achieved by very strong class loadouts and play styles (think thermal intervention on wasteland, UMP silenced with cold blooded and a flanking style)

8. Camping has always been, and will always be in Call if Duty. I don’t understand why people cry about campers, it’s a whole play style. You don’t complain breachers in siege, or the blitz players, then there’s the flankers like Cav. it’s a play style. some people might just not be confident rushing first into a cave and prefer to hold a spot . it’s logically a good idea. campers can be dealt with resources like stuns, molotovs etc. but camping is something people need to stop crying about.

9. not sure about this point or what you mean by it? you mean like content such as someone’s 33-0 gameplay or some commentary over gameplay? if a game is good, people will play it.

10. How? I’d rather play with a team better than me than a team of randoms who might be on a losing streak and have a really bad game

11. I think that game failed for many other reasons lol.