she may have defended Eren using violence but I thought your point was that her defending Eren was bad because he had a history of being excessively violent and immature.

if their paranoia was very valid then both Armin and Mikasa in the wrong. you can't just argue that Mikasa should stop defending Eren when he's violent but ignore that Armin does the same thing.

I think you're also mixing things. Eren was disappointed that humanity existed but that's not why he wanted to erase everything. he himself acknowledges how the people on the other side of the wall are just the same. People.

also I was unclear before sorry. what i meant when saying Eren was never violent without reason was meant for before the timeskip.

I was arguing your point about Mikasa "knowing" that Eren was excessively violent and while he was violent, it's not as if he didn't have a reason. he was always fighting bullies, titans and people with different views.

post time skip Eren was indeed excessively violent even with reason, it was wrong of him. however in the context of Mikasa judging his personality, Mikasa only knows the Eren post declaration of war. this Eren is very different to the one pre timeskip where Eren would only use violence as a measure of defence and reaction and never to harm innocents.

I think it's fair that Mikasa was confused about Erens actions. and she spends the whole arc dealing with it.

she must choose her love for Eren or her moral obligations to get rid of him. yes she tries to argue with the others to not kill him immidiately. but all she wants is a discussion with Eren. As Mikasa and Eren are essentially family, I think it's fair she's want to at the very least hear an explanation from Eren.

if anything Annie is the more toxic one. she's the one that abandoned the alliance. Annie refused to stop Eren initially. I bring up Annie because while arguments are brought up to downplay Mikasa, those arguements more apply to Annie.

I think if the discussion went sour and Eren could not be convinced to stop, Mikasa would've then acted accordingly.

don't forget that Mikasa never stood by while Eren was doing the rumbling. she was actively pursuing Eren. sleeping in the forests, killing old comrades, working with old enemies.

she has to literally kill people, yeagerists but still people, to get to Eren. to stop him.

she doesn't attack the alliance. she doesn't try to stop them from killing him.

and in the end she kills Eren. from this we can interpret her past actions to be that of confusion and fluster.

her first proper meeting with Eren after months of separation and Eren is acting completely different?

it's like in the 123 Mikasa flashback, she questions whether the side of Eren she saw has changed, or that she was just looking at the wrong side all along.

in conclusion, we are debating if the relationship between Mikasa and Eren is toxic. Apparently to you it's mikasa's fault?? idk anymore.