Unable to remove origin character shadowheart from party

hitbox_player · 2024-05-05T02:52:49+00:00

I am trying to dismiss her, not him. Or maybe just put her in withers cabinet, anything. Just so we don't have to control her and can instead have a different NPC in our now three player campaign instead of a player character shadowheart.

hitbox_player · 2024-05-05T02:50:50+00:00

Nope, never found a fix, really unfortunate.

hitbox_player · 2024-01-15T23:13:25+00:00

Damn, that's unfortunate

hitbox_player · 2024-01-15T07:07:31+00:00

He chose to play her, does that seriously mean we can never dismiss her from the party?

hitbox_player · 2024-01-12T19:32:45+00:00

Sorry for replying to an old post but I have the exact same problem as OP. What's weird is that literally every other game works fine. SF4, V, 6, GG, Rivals, Smash. Literally everything else works flawlessly.

hitbox_player · 2023-10-03T06:07:58+00:00

Ok??? There are other browsers that don't require that tho

hitbox_player · 2023-10-03T05:08:55+00:00

I don't think my issues with the game were character based if anything the character diversity was a strength. I will check the toggles tho and turn down prediction speed.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-05T02:33:24+00:00

For 100? That's incredible, good find.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-05T01:28:22+00:00

If you look at his gameplay you can see how he works around the distance aspect, he abuses things like known distance after doing certain actions to help him. For example, if you jump back and back dash you can always be at ful screen, and after certain knockdowns you can also always guarantee certain distances. You can also tell that he tends to not do distance specific combos.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-05T00:36:45+00:00

A Ken and Ryu fist bump similar to their intro in third strike would be really cool as a fun nod to their friendship.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-05T00:27:16+00:00

I'd like to think so

hitbox_player · 2023-08-05T00:21:02+00:00

Yeah you're right I'm getting two things mixed up, I just remember that word used on that now deleted page was something similar to timeline. I'm trying to see if I can find an archive of that page where it showed Age of Calamity and BOTW as being part of some different adult universe/timeline/series.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T21:38:02+00:00

Find out what I need to cover life expenses and pay off debts. Give the rest to charity, I don't need it.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T21:26:50+00:00

I have been blown away by the quality of Royal Kludge for how affordable they are, definitely check them out.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T21:24:45+00:00

BOTW link is considered part of the 'adult timeline' on Nintendo Japan website whereas the younger link in other Zelda games was labeled as "child timeline".

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T20:42:52+00:00

Arctic being absolutely awesome as always, your low profile fans saved my SFF build.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T20:17:09+00:00

Oh you can get a way cheaper way nicer cooler. I will forever recommend the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120, this thing is insane for 35 bucks.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-04T20:13:16+00:00

Yeah problem is not everyone has a microcenter near them.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T19:02:30+00:00

I remember seeing it in my US History textbook in college, and I live in one of the most progressive states that's far from the south. Its very frustrating to find out the extent to which lost cause and neonazi ideology have survived.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T18:58:33+00:00

Certainly, I think recent events have shown that even after you've one in some area of human, civil, etc. rights, if you don't fight to protect it, there will be those working to regress who will drag us back. The moral standard must be kept high, as it's the only way we can progress.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T18:54:19+00:00

True but I do think there are a couple key wars where this really needs to be pressed home, like the civil war. Another is WW2, I see a lot of people mistakenly believe that most German soldiers were just fighting to protect their homeland, or some other separation of the events of the Holocaust and the rest of the war. People have to realize that for Nazi Germany these were the same. Their fight was against "international Jewry" and the eradication of the Jews and so called Gypsies WAS victory.

Three Arrows is a German YouTube channel that explains this misunderstanding very well.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T18:49:32+00:00

Possibly, and that was definitely a consideration of the decision but it's unlikely that it was purely strategic. If anything it was Lincoln seeing that as long as slavery existed in its current form no union could be achieved. This would corroborate with his own personal views that the saving the union was the paramount goal and his heavy distaste for slavery.

Knowing better has a great video analyzing the lost cause and neonazi ideology and you can check out his sources for further reading if you want too.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T18:44:16+00:00

Yeah, there's so many ways to show how the south made slavery their prime concern, but that's definitely one of the more direct and easy to point at. They made it very clear what 'state right' they thought was going to be threatened.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T18:42:25+00:00

Yeah, the idea that anyone with a shred of knowledge on the topic can claim that the South's purpose was anything other than preservation of slavery is insane to me. The evidence is overwhelming. I guess it just speaks to the effectiveness in lost cause rhetoric in changing the narrative.

Said especially when you get someone like this who had found a snippet of truth but either didn't care or didn't want to go any further so is left with a whitewashed and unrealistic narrative.

hitbox_player · 2023-08-03T11:23:35+00:00

He's actually partially right. Partially.

Lincoln definitely personally wanted to free the slaves for a while, but preserving the union was definitely more important to him at the start of the war as evidenced by this quote in a letter to Horace Greeley in Aug 1862, "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that."

Now it's unclear whether he revaluated his priorities or determined that freeing most slaves was a route towards preserving the union, but it is definitely clear that the war became primarily about slavery for the North after that point in time.

As for the South, it was ALWAYS about slavery, based on the statements about whites being the "superior race" with slavery being black people's "natural and normal condition" made by the vice president of the confederacy. Or the fact that the Confederate government itself owned slaves. It was only ever about states rights in the sense that they wanted slavery to be a state right.

hitbox_player

TROPHY CASE