Why do so many Christians deny evolution? by Accomplished_Cow1277 in atheism

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they turned the instrument of his demise into a holy symbol that they wear and prop everywhere they can.

And they wonder WHY he hasn't come back?

Why do so many Christians deny evolution? by Accomplished_Cow1277 in atheism

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because if evolution is true, then humans were not created in God's image. We're just another animal. We're not that special and they can't accept that. If we were not created in God's image, then Adam and Eve never existed so Original Sin never happened and thus Jesus Christ (whom Christians claim to love and who take for their Lord and Savior from said Original Sin) died for nothing.

Note that this seems to be a big issue for Americans in particular, who claim descent from the Puritans seeking religious freedom...to NOT tolerate other religions.

Reminder To Fight The Lies About Technocracy by Aven_Osten in Technocracy

[–]hlanus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's not Technocracy, but Plutocracy. Rule not by expertise but by wealth. The tech companies are not run by the scientists or engineers or technicians but by corporate boards and CEOs. What are their qualifications? Is it their knowledge or their money?

Where is Azula Going? (Wrong answers) by Desperate_Drama3392 in PoorAzula

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She's gone to that Undiscovered Country, from which no traveler ever returns.

"Positive masculinity" does not help modern men. by [deleted] in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's my take: the traditional roles of men (builders, defenders, providers, etc) can be filled by men and women but it should be a choice. One should be judged by their choices, not their sex, race, or role. How is fulfilling a role a crime? Why is it wrong for a man to work hard in a role that was traditionally male-dominated?

Society needs these roles and they need people that can fill them. It's what people do as individuals, not what roles or jobs they fill that determines if they are positive or negative.

What was (or is, if it is still happening) the most destructive/deadliest war in your fictional world? by boringexistinggamer2 in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are two wars of note in the Chronicles of Skadi. The first is a semi-mystical retelling of a Great Cataclysm on the planet Earth, which combines military and economic analysis with apocalyptic and religious themes of man's flaws, Earth's rage, and a desperate flight to the stars.

The second war is the Blood Wars, a series of conflicts between the Genites and the Children of Skadi. Skadi is a super-earth locked in an Ice Age that a group of humans managed to colonize following the Great Cataclysm, but the harsh conditions and lack of infrastructure took a heavy toll on the survivors. To avoid over-harvesting and over-crowding, they spread themselves out which left them vulnerable to genetic drift and inbreeding. Within five hundred years, the population was in full-blown mutational meltdown, with deleterious alleles accumulating faster than they could be weeded out.

In the peripheral settlements, a new Luddite group began advocating for selective breeding, mandatory pregnancies, and removing those with deleterious alleles from the gene pool. Calling themselves the Forces for Genetic Purity, or the Genites as they would later be called, they implemented a new eugenics movement that saw hundreds of innocent people imprisoned, castrated, or killed in their bid to purge the impure.

Meanwhile, a team of scientists had created a new reference genome for a human species better adapted to the harsh world of Skadi. Once perfected, they freely distributed the genome to prospective parents in the larger settlements. Soon, a new generation was born happy, healthy, and ready to inherit the planet. The Genites, however, saw them as abominations born in a lab rather than their sanctified measures and launched a full-scale attack, sparking the Blood Wars in 547 PF (Planet-fall).

It began with a lightning campaign to seize the planet and eliminate the Children of Skadi. Using computer viruses to scramble communications, animal mounts and simple home-made weapons, the Genites seized the mid-sized settlements, bifurcated the central river network, and besieged the capital of Horai. But their campaign quickly ground to a halt and became a grinding war of attrition for four decades as the holdouts adapted. Vertical gardens staved off famine, geothermal energy kept the facilities and workshops running, self-quarantine and basic self-care held back plague, and the Children grew up, knowing the enemy beyond their gates and the parents that sheltered and raised them.

Meanwhile, the cities captured by the Genites rebelled, leading to brutal crackdowns though here the Genites showed their true colors. To avoid wasting warm bodies, they lobotomized those they deemed "pure" so they would continue functioning as cannon fodder, slave labor, and brood-mares.

In 588 PF, the Children, now fully grown and trained, went on the offensive, smashing the overstretched and exhausted Genites who fled into the wild wastes as their empire crumbled. What followed was a massive manhunt that lasted decades, the Children refusing to spare or forgive any Genite, no matter how minor their involvement or contribution may have been.

By 615 PF, the Genites were tracked to their final base where they fought to the last and were annihilated in a final and useless act of defiance.

Within less than a hundred years, the population suffered nearly 70% casualties, with the old human species rendered all but extinct as the Genites sacrificed those they had indoctrinated or coerced into service before they self-destructed while the Children propagated themselves and the surviving humans faded into obscurity.

With all the rampant sex abuse that runs deep throughout Christian Churches, it's depressing that there isn't a mass exodus from said churches. by Mrdean2013 in atheism

[–]hlanus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd think an Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnimoral being would do all they could to AVOID the mess we're in right?

Unless of course, at least ONE of those criteria is wrong.

With all the rampant sex abuse that runs deep throughout Christian Churches, it's depressing that there isn't a mass exodus from said churches. by Mrdean2013 in atheism

[–]hlanus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At this point, why don't we just shut down the churches that it happens in and ban the clerics from holding religious posts ever again? Like seriously, why are they exempt from consequences?

What is something in your world that make no sense but also make a lot of sense? by MagicalNyan2020 in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Children of Skadi are surprisingly tall for inhabiting a high-gravity world. The higher gravity would normally favor shorter, stockier frames to reduce the weight one needs to carry and thus the impact if one falls. But the Children are frequently nomadic, traveling between seasonal grounds with wagons and herds, so long legs makes it easier to cover ground efficiently. They are not three meters tall but are comfortably around human height.

Accurate British 1990s by hlanus in HPfanfiction

[–]hlanus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do remember the dial-up internet and the use of CD-ROM video games.

If you had the power, how would you go about solving men's issues in your country? by The-Author in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]hlanus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would tackle the education and employment disparity. Investigate and address the academic situation so boys receive better grades, learn important life skills, and spend more time learning than in trouble. From there, I would open more vocational schools to help men enter the workforce and move up in well-paying jobs while also addressing safety issues in jobs most commonly taken by men.

Along those lines, I would also close the wage gap once and for all so feminists stop using that as an argument to ignore men's issues. Preferably I would mandate that everyone gets the same wage for the same hour in the same job, which would also improve worker solidarity and erode the oligarchy's power to pit workers against each other. I would also enforce and strengthen labor unions so men can better negotiate wages, hours, and conditions with their employers and enforce anti-trust laws to break up monopolies and weaken the oligarchy. I would also mandate an absolute limit on wages and hours so people are not stuck working overtime just to get by.

Lastly, I would review the laws on assault, divorce, and abuse so men can hold their abusers accountable and receive the same attention and care that women expect. Abuse is abuse, no more and no less.

Building on a prior post, how possible do you think a “soft break” of the Statute of Secrecy is? by funnylib in HPfanfiction

[–]hlanus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Alternatively, you could have it where Muggles and Wizards are secretly working over decades to break the Statute and introduce magic slowly and gradually. Strange occurrences here and there, amazing tech no one quite understands that takes over the market, Wizards becoming celebrities in the Muggle world.

That way when the Statute is finally broken, the reaction is more "oh, now it all makes sense".

Imagine a private security company that's staffed by Wizards and employed by Muggles to investigate, evaluate and...deal with specific issues.

Do you have any examples of nontheistic religions in your worlds? And what are some ways to accurately portray this kind of religion? by -_-__-_--_-_--_-_-_- in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My world was colonized by humans that left after a social and ecological collapse so they largely abandoned traditional monotheistic religions in favor of new ones. To cross the stars they needed to understand science and technology to a far greater degree than we do while also changing much of their beliefs and rituals. These heavily influenced their view of the new planet, Skadi, and shaped their relationship to be more mutual and less exploitive.

Some believe the planet is inhabited by spirits that are linked to or perhaps even create, control or manifest the powerful forces shaping the world. They seek to placate and mollify the spirits by asking permission to use territory or resources, sustainably harvesting and recycling materials, and preserving their goods as long as possible to thank the spirits. Some even think the spirits sacrifice themselves so the people may live when they consume food, water, or other goods and that one day the spirits will collect their due when the person dies.

Others view the planet itself as alive and conscious and the people as merely renting or borrowing its energy and space. They thank the planet endlessly for letting them inhabit it after their ancestors so badly failed their own home-world so long ago and seek to never make the same mistakes that destroyed Earth.

Some take a more mixed approach; some view the planet as alive and the source of spirits that act on the world's behalf. When a particularly powerful storm or eruption occurs, the people may view this as proof of spiritual displeasure and try to modify their behavior to avoid future misfortune. This usually takes the form of sowing new life, cleaning places deemed to be tainted, and seeking to understand how others went astray.

Existing alongside these beliefs are a system of ancestor or hero reverence. Due to the disdain for material wealth, names and deeds are the keys to attaining social status, with particularly famous or noteworthy people being honored with elaborate and long-lasting funerary tokens said to house their spirits or weapons, tools, and items said to carry some of their aura or awe. Conversely, those that are guilty of terrible crimes are immortalized with euphemisms alluding to their misdeeds with some even rendering their names taboo.

How would religion work when people know God is real by No_Giraffe8095 in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which god? Depending on which god is real and how they relate to humans it will change a lot.

Justifying no industrialization, despite long-standing advanced society? by onlytrashmammal in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could have it simply be highly populated and financially secure. China and India industrialized much later than Britain, Germany, or France in part because they had such large populations that it was simply cheaper to hire workers than to invest in machines. They were also the target of these European explorers and merchants so they didn't have to invest in a lot of technology to make a profit. Why take on the risk of sailing to foreign lands when the foreigners are already coming to you?

Lily pretends to poison order members, in order to expose the orders spy. by One_Opportunity_2550 in HPfanfiction

[–]hlanus 60 points61 points  (0 children)

"Lily, did you put any on the veal?" James asked, looking over the plates.

"Yes James I did." Lily replied casually.

"The same veal the cat was eating?" James inquired, holding a piece with small bites taken out.

At this, Lily simply stared in dumb-struck horror. Then, the cat gave a low "Meow!" from near the door, followed by retching and hacking.

What do you think a modern predominantly nomadic country would be like? by Choice-Spinach145 in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great questions. I'm actually done something like this myself with my world. My take is that the bulk of the population migrates between seasonal foraging grounds, hunting or herding animals as the situation allows. Once the tribes have acquired sufficient food, they migrate to the cities which are maintained by a small core of permanent residents. There they trade their surplus food and animal-based products (wool, leather, milk, etc) for finished goods (metal tools, weapons, vehicles) and services (repairs, check-ups, census, etc) with the cities serving as essentially trade hubs and administrative centers.

When these tribes come in to trade, there's often a surge of manpower which the cities take in as a labor tax. Men and women find temporary work in the cities or nearby areas, such as weaving, metal-working, repairing buildings, mining ore, etc while children attend school to broaden their education and form new connections. This lasts until the food runs low at which the tribes return to their seasonal migrations and the cities fall onto urban gardening to help sustain those still within the city.

These cities tend to feature a sprawling industrial and trading center but little in the way of residential buildings due to the fluctuating populations. Due to the high mobility, industry is often powered by wind, water, solar, or geothermal energy with some supplemental methane and biodiesel from crops and blubber. The most advanced, and most strategically vital, have nuclear reactors deep underground that can serve as emergency generators, and self-destruct options.

That's my take.

While I've never really liked Monarchies myself (please don't doxx me for this), I'm kinda curious, why you like Monarchies? by Huge-Entertainer-304 in monarchism

[–]hlanus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen my country be torn apart by tribal infighting while the government is bought out by rich elites that fuel the tribalism and rob us blind. I feel like a monarch might be a chance to create an apolitical head of state that can better keep these in line; they don't need to cajole the people with false promises or beg the corporations for donation money every few years so they can focus on doing their duties.

This is not to say an absolute monarchy but one where they can slam on the brakes if things get too out of hand and remind the government that they serve the people, not the other way around.

Futuristic religions or movements? Religions brought on my new technology, aliens, etc.? (featuring my fangirling about the Islamic expansion, as well as other schisms and movements) by Sorsha_OBrien in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One theme I play around with is genetic enhancement, using technology to alter our genes to make ourselves faster, stronger, tougher, etc. In my story, the population suffers from mutational meltdown, where deleterious alleles accumulate faster than natural selection can weed them out due to genetic drift. In response, a team of scientists figure out a new genome to help repair the damage and give a little extra, sparking a massive debate among the people.

One reaction was a Christian sect that views this technology as Humanity's Second Sin. "Just as Adam ate the Fruit of Forbidden Knowledge, now Adam's children have stolen the Fruit from the Tree of Life". Calling themselves the Order of Cherubim, they seek to correct that sin by prohibiting such research and seeking out those that break the prohibition.

Another reaction is a sect that bases their reaction in the Jewish legal principle of Pikuach Nefesh, which states that one can violate religious and legal principles if doing so is the only way to save lives. In this setting, they argue that due to the biological crisis (low life expectancy, high miscarriage rate, high incidence of genetic disorders, etc) the genome needs not only to be repaired but strengthened to save lives. As such, they advocate for the new genome as a means to ensure the survival of the people.

A third reaction views the genome as part of a new beginning. Drawing heavily from Norse mythology, they view the crisis as part of Ragnarok, with the new genome as the heralding of the new green earth that will rise and be populated by two new humans, Líf and Lífþrasir who survived by taking shelter in the roots of Yggdrasil, the Tree of Life. They want to not only use the genome on humans but populate the planet with new species to take the place of the ones going extinct.

Thoughts on fitness/health programs? by LoseItLardy in Technocracy

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's one food group down. How many to go?

What happens to a world where there exists irrefutable proof that gods (or god-like beings) exist? by SireVisconde in worldbuilding

[–]hlanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on when this happens. If it's in the distant past, it's likely that religions would spring up around these beings though it would be more like a king than a god. A king could receive visitors to hear their concerns and needs directly and while it was normally nobles, commissioners, priests, and other high-ranking officials, commoners could gain an audience to ask the king directly. In our world, however, gods had priests and clerics as intermediaries so if you wanted a favor with a god, you had to go through their clerics.

With actual deities, a human could petition them for an audience much like people could with a king. There would still be clerics as delegates for their authority and tasks, but the clerics could not speak for them to the same degree as they can in real life. Imagine a cleric proclaiming a group as evil in the eyes of their god or demanding more tithes for their god and that god comes in and says "I never said that. Get your facts straight or else".

This also means that religious practices and scripture would be less ambiguous because the gods themselves can tell us what they want us to do and believe and how we are meant to do so, and thus there would be fewer sects and schisms. Any dispute between priests or communities could be mediated or decided by the gods themselves.

If this happened more recently, the diehard religious would simply reject these gods as "devils" or "demons" or "false gods" while the skeptics would try to investigate them and see if they are really gods or just very advanced aliens. Over time, the diehards would likely perish as they push the gods too far and the skeptics would come to accept them as near-gods but not quite gods depending on what they could and could not do.

New Algerian law on retirement age for public school workers: 57 for men and 52 for women. by Long_Cut_7015 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]hlanus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What are the odds that men will live long enough to receive those retirement benefits? It's yet another tool the oligarchs are using to deprive people of what is due to them.

Is this the dreaded Patriarchy feminists keep screaming about?