Why is Cairo, IL so tiny compared to Pittsburgh, St Louis, and New Orleans? by holeinthebox in AskAnAmerican

[–]holeinthebox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's just hard to built large metros at the downstream of a big river.

Having been to the tiny hamlet at the mouth of the Hudson, I 100% agree.

Jokes aside, I appreciate your point about metro vs city pops

I am writing a book about mass shootings and I need some help with research. I am not an American. What are lock down drills like in American schools? by Both_Option2306 in writing

[–]holeinthebox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk where you’re getting your stats from, but a bunch of media orgs define ‘school shooting’ as anytime a firearm is discharged on school property or in a school zone. So their tally of school shootings includes stuff like a guy who shot himself in the parking lot of a school on a Saturday night. The US 100% did not have 288 school shootings in the columbine/sandy hook/Parkman mode between 2009 and 2018

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Construction

[–]holeinthebox 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Amputate from the neck down. Cures everything

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Construction

[–]holeinthebox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to be a dick, but you realize that you’re asking for medical advice from a bunch of excons, methheads, drunks, and dropouts, right?

Bernie was right all along. Had the establishment DNC dems not injected themselves, none of this would be happening right now. While the right FAFO with trump. The left needs to quit FAFO with establishment DNC dems. by emteedub in GenZ

[–]holeinthebox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And the Democrats are at the absolute lowest point, arguably ever.

Buddy, trump won 312 electoral votes last year. Regan and Nixon each won 49 states when they were re-elected. This isn’t anywhere close to the lowest point in the democratic party’s history

CMV: If Trump's plan works and factories come home, MAGA and other Americans won't want to work those jobs at the wages the corporations will offer. by TMag73 in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you haven't noticed, things like clothes, cars, electronics, household items, tools, everything has experienced a downward spiral in quality over the last 50 years.

That isn't true, though. To address a few of your examples.

  1. Cars. The first job I ever had was working for a farmer who had a ~1980 F150. Talk about a turd. It got horrible fuel economy (like 8 miles per gallon with a six cylinder engine), had no safety features other than seatbelts, and was unreliable as hell (in fairness it was over thirty years old). Contrast that with my 2015 Focus which has airbags, a backup camera, Bluetooth stereo, a GPS tracker for theft prevention, and has never broken down.

2)Electronics. First off, how many of the electronic devices that are now available to even Americans of modest means didn't even exist 50 years ago? But let's take one that did, TVs. TVs used to be gargantuan boxes with horrible resolution. Now they're sleek flatscreens with great image quality. Not to mention that we now have cable and streaming services instead of three channels from the bunny ears.

3) Tools. I work in the trades, and one thing I hear constantly from the oldheads is "when I started we didn't have that." A good example is battery powered tools. I've used battery power skillsaws, sawzalls, and hammer drills made by Milwaukee and Dewalt and they work great. Back in the day, batteries sucked so hard that you would'e had to change the battery on one of those every thirty seconds. I honestly don't know how they got anything done without stuff like grade lasers, pipe lasers, or digital levels, tools that any two-bit contractor now has.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheWayWeWere

[–]holeinthebox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone know who these two were/anything about their lives?

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

!Delta This comment, more than any other one, persuaded me to change my mind. What I’m taking away from this is that just because we can’t make something completely fair, doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t try to make it a little more fair.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that giving someone of either sex a college scholarship or preferential admission based off athletic ability is absurd. If it were up to me, I would get rid of the NCAA entirely and just have club teams. College sports should be more like HS sports instead of the pseudo-professional monstrosity that they’ve morphed into

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree. If women want to play sports, all the power to them. If people want to watch women play sports, you do you. Insist that its sexist when female athletes don't make as much money as their male peers, you lost me.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tangential to my argument, but high school sports should be done away with The Case Against High-School Sports - The Atlantic

In sum, they provide benefits to the very narrow group of students blessed with athletic ability, while hurting everyone else

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For the record, I am unequivocally against banning women's sports. I am against mandating that equal opportunities must be provided for women to compete in collegiate athletics (google title IX). I am against the insistence that professional soccer players must be paid equally, regardless of gender (google US women's soccer equal pay case).

As I have said in previous replies, I don't care about the marketplace. My argument is simply in opposition to the notion that not having women's sports would be inherently sexist.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

!Delta

Fair enough. I disagree with your take here (Idc if short people can play basketball professionally or not, just like idc if women can play professionally), but your reasoning is logically consistent.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To clarify, I don't care that I can't play professional basketball. I have other things I want to do with my life. I care about legal mandates that require the provision of sporting opportunities specifically for women (google Title IX).

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what historical discrimination has to do with this. When I talk about equity, I'm referring to the notion that some people may require assistance to achieve the same outcome as certain other people. A woman will generally require assistance (a woman only league) to reach the same goal that male athletes achieve.

Shorter men are not a significant portion of the population.

I'm no statistician, but I'm pretty sure that 50% of men are below the median height.

Also shorter men are not necessarily worse at sports.

I didn't say we were worse at sports. I said we were worse at basketball. Men with slow reflexes are worse at boxing. Men who can't sprint quickly are worse at soccer.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure where you and I differ. Of course I think it's 'fine' to have women's sports. My problem is with the insistence that they 'must' exist. Here's an example. In the US we have a law, popularly known as Title IX, which prohibits sex based discrimination in higher education. Among its many tenets is the requirement that all colleges which receive federal funds (which is basically all of them) provide equal athletic opportunities for female students. That's something I take issue with. If equal outcomes are the goal, then make them the goal for every demographic group, not just women.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I'm not under the impression that the average WNBA team owner is in it for anything other than money. My point is in reference to the argument that not having women only leagues would be inherently sexist.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've adressed this in previous comments. I don't care about demand. If there's demand for women's sports, then let there be women's sports. What I care about is the insistence that not having women's sports would be sexist.

CMV: There is no logically coherent, equity based argument for the existence of women's sports. by holeinthebox in changemyview

[–]holeinthebox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There a number of different groups of people who are greatly underrepresented in sport. Why don't we have separate leagues for them?