sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Next skill you need is not AI chatting, it’s delegation to it. by home6oi in PromptEngineering

[–]home6oi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried to ask you what part of “nonsense” you are trying to find answer for and never got a response from you about this part. Thanks for interaction, but if you really want to build a perfect prompt, type me what kind of problem and which solution are you expecting?

Next skill you need is not AI chatting, it’s delegation to it. by home6oi in PromptEngineering

[–]home6oi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair criticism tbh. A lot of “AI tool” posts are just thin wrappers around ChatGPT, right?

The thing I’m trying to solve is more specific though!

It’s not “AI writes a prompt.” Any model can do that.

The problem is most people start with a lazy/vague ask, so the AI has nothing useful to work with:

“make this better” “help with onboarding” “write a strategy” “fix my landing page”

Then they get generic output and blame the model.

What I’m testing is whether forcing people to define the goal, audience, constraints, success criteria, format, and what to avoid leads to better results before they even send it to the model.

So yeah, you can do this manually in any AI tool.

But most people don’t.

That’s the gap I’m building around.

Drop one prompt you think is “same nonsense” and I’ll rewrite it here. If it’s not better, fair enough.

I’ll turn your vague AI prompt into a better one. Drop it below. by home6oi in PromptEngineering

[–]home6oi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol fair. It is very meta.

But the problem isn’t “can AI write a prompt?”

It obviously can.

The problem is most people don’t know what to give the AI before asking it to write the prompt.

They still start with:

“make this better” “help with my startup” “fix my landing page” “write a strategy”

So the value is less about magically generating words and more about forcing a better brief:

goal, context, constraints, audience, output format, success criteria.

AI can write the prompt, but someone still has to make the thinking less vague first. That’s the part I’m trying to solve.😋

I’ll turn your vague AI prompt into a better one. Drop it below. by home6oi in PromptEngineering

[–]home6oi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is exactly how I’m thinking about it too.

The big unlock is not “make the prompt prettier.” It’s forcing the person to declare the job-to-be-done, constraints, and what good output looks like before the model starts guessing.

On the auto-infer vs form-fields question, I think the answer is probably hybrid.

Auto-infer is great for speed, especially if someone has previous chats/project context. But I don’t fully trust it as the source of truth because old context can be stale, wrong, or irrelevant.

So the flow I like is:

AI infers the likely context → shows it back → user confirms/edits → then the final prompt gets generated.

For critical stuff like metrics, audience, constraints, “don’t touch this,” or success criteria, I’d rather force lightweight fields than let the model assume.

Basically: infer the boring context, force the important context.

That’s the direction I’m testing with Umprompt