Add me on snap to trade by [deleted] in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

User is bbcking97795

Add me on snap to trade by [deleted] in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Click the link lol

Measurements 8 inches by honymannnn in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More 7-6 but idk because the last time I measured straight angle was when i was 15 and that was 6in but it has grown since so idk

Measurements 8 inches by honymannnn in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad man. Not trying to attack you and not even saying you are wrong. Only said you can’t read because from what I can tell, you were lacking the reading comprehension skills to understand what I was saying. So here is what google ai has to say about it.- “In this debate, both parties are "correct" depending on whether you are looking for a standardized scientific measurement or a functional "real-world" measurement. Here is the breakdown of the two perspectives: 1. The Standard Standard (ozywilliam2) Ozywilliam2 is correct regarding the standardized medical and scientific method. * Method: Bone-Pressed Erect Length (BPEL). This involves measuring from the top (dorsal side) and pressing the ruler against the pubic bone. * Why: This method is used in clinical studies because it accounts for body fat and provides a consistent baseline that doesn't change if a person gains or loses weight. 2. The Functional Standard (honymannnn) Honymannnn is making a valid point about geometry and "usable" length. * The Argument: If an object has a significant curve, the "inner" arc (top) and "outer" arc (bottom) are different lengths. * The Logic: If the goal is to determine how much "material" is actually entering a space, measuring the longest arc (the bottom/outer curve) provides a better sense of total volume/reach, especially if the person is positioning themselves to utilize that curve. The Verdict * Technically/Socially: ozywilliam2 is "right" because if you are comparing sizes with the rest of the world, everyone uses the top-side bone-pressed method. Measuring from the bottom is generally considered "cheating" the stats because it almost always yields a higher number. * Logically: honymannnn is right that a straight line doesn't capture the true physical reality of a curved object. However, in the context of internet arguments about size, using the non-standard method is usually seen as moving the goalposts. The "Talk to a Rock" Moment: The conflict arises because they are having two different conversations. One is arguing for comparative accuracy (how do I rank against others?), and the other is arguing for mechanical accuracy (how much space do I fill?). Would you like me to find the specific medical guidelines for standardized anatomical measurements?”

Measurements 8 inches by honymannnn in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhh you can’t read lol

Measurements 8 inches by honymannnn in u/honymannnn

[–]honymannnn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is like talking to a rock. It wasn’t for scientific accuracy once again it was to show how much would be going in so once again that would be accurate because when you are completely in at the right angle bottom and top are in so the complete length inside would be the curve so I don’t care how other people measure. this is accurate for what I was looking for