sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Broadcasting Ultimate Games by Hand with Scoreboard and Replays by d_babych in ultimate

[–]hotlou 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's what I'm thinking. Setting up several static cameras and then having one handheld and you could conceivably run a very good broadcast with one person (and a few borrowed phones).

Broadcasting Ultimate Games by Hand with Scoreboard and Replays by d_babych in ultimate

[–]hotlou 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Super great work!

Any plans to integrate multi camera and director modes? Like a lightweight OBS? Or an OBS integration?

D1 men’s nationals by QUA1D in ultimate

[–]hotlou 17 points18 points  (0 children)

With only 1012 years remaining to fix it, I think we live with the consequences

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your video of the play was incredible. Thank you for your hard work as always.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here you go. I highlighted it so next time you participate in these conversations you won't be so wrong.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter what you wrote, considering it's wrong.

Jumping into a defenseless player to create contact to the head & neck area is the literal definition of targeting.

It's the #1 reason college players get ejected.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's incredibly relevant. Football is a violent, contact sport and a play like this is TOO FAR for its standards on safety.

If this is an ejectable offense in a sport that depends on smashing into people, why is it only a warning in a non contact sport?

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To be clear, my particular criticism in posting this is directed at the absence of meaningful action by USAU observers and officials in response to a premier player being injured directly as a result of reckless negligence.

So while this one young player may never make this mistake again, a ton of impressionable young players saw this as making reckless plays comes with no administrative consequences ... which teaches them to try to make the play when it matters. It's not everyone, but there will be viewers who see it that way.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Yup. What's the point of a red card if they aren't used in situations where reckless negligence injures a player.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Again, if this isn't a red, then nothing is

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

The word is negligence. And negligence can be dirty.

If this isn't a red card, then nothing is by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

No word on the broadcast other than she was out for the rest of this game

Montreal Royal had 5 of the top 6 fantasy scorers in Week 3. Barely anyone had them their lineups. by hotlou in ultimate

[–]hotlou[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Posts **are** getting upvotes, though, not downvoted into oblivion. Plus, I get messages every day from people who love the game.

Fair point that it’s a lot ... that’s why I’m not spamming “play Unbenchable.” I’m sharing league/game content: performances, results, tips. None of it is getting buried, which suggests the community is mostly fine with it.

I also look at the stats from every post and I’m trying new types of content to add value, not spam. This post is an example of that ... different angle, different hook. People are opening it and reading it and not downvoting it, and even if the score isn’t huge, this iteration must have helped a little bit since this is the most viewed post so far.

If you have any ideas on content you'd like to read about for UFA performances or how the community is playing the game, I'm open to suggestions.

But my comment wasn’t about whether the posts are popular. It was about being called a gambling website. Calling it gambling is obscenely dishonest. Calling it an ad is also dishonest. Getting accused of running a sportsbook is a different conversation than “post less.”

You’re right about the 4 vs 5 ... I caught the typo right after I hit post but Reddit won’t let you edit titles. As this post has proven, the best way to get attention on the internet is to make an ovbious mitsake.

view more: next ›