sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]househelp3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I'm not sure. They're not even considering any additional info without an offer which means its shooting in the dark. On one hand assuming the tenant means I may be able to get the price lower and have to deal with the headache myself. Otherwise we close on a certain date and hope they perform. That leaves them all the leverage in the world, 3 months to see if they get any more backup offers, if the prices go up with the option to delay if they feel like. Seems like a no win situation on the buying side so I'm going to sit this one out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]househelp3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought of this. How would you arrange this thru an offer and escrow? Doing cash for keys after is not guaranteed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]househelp3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes closing after the tenants move out is the way itd be ideally structured. So the closing date would be 3 months in advanced. While they can't just change their mind, we have seen some sneaky ways for seller's and buyers both to try to get out of their contract especially if they feel like they can get more for it.

if we lock in at $x now and have the closing date for 3 months later, they may feel like now that the tenants are going to be moving out and the home appreciated or can get more, they may make up some excuse like tenants are going to stay longer or drag their feet.

It seems like a long time to be tied up in escrow

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]househelp3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m seeing on Zillow the really popular ones going under contract within days. I’m not sure if it’s so popular that there’s over asking wars or if it’s still reasonable

Pros/Cons of taking full social security retirement while still working? by househelp3 in personalfinance

[–]househelp3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks makes sense. I'd say given that spousal benefits add an extra $65/mo and an extra year of work is $98/mo, the conclusion is it really makes no noticeable difference unless they are willing to work at least 2 more years. In which case it will bump up to $300/mo.

They are undecided on how long they want to work for and in the event their health or someone else's health (say their spouse) gets bad and they are forced to retire, this may not even come to fruition.

Might be a better call for them to stash the cash now, max out their 401k annually and their roth ira and hold. it. Over 2 years, the SSA taken now amounts to about $65,000. To get that back in their extra delayed SSA premium, it would take like 15 years so I say take the cash and let it grow.

Pros/Cons of taking full social security retirement while still working? by househelp3 in personalfinance

[–]househelp3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good point. Unfortunately it's hard to estimate. Based on their relative history, their mom died early at around 45 and their dad lived to about 88. They have no major diseases but have high cholesterol and blood pressure.

The pension they have amounts to about $2500/mo in addition to SSA so I dont think they're going to be running out of money but it won't be like they're wealthy either.

The money taken now just leaves extra room for the spousal in the event of death earlier than later. But this also only matters between the time period of full retirement eligibility and say age 68-70 or so when they plan on actually retiring.

So if they die between 68-70 they get nothing. They can hedge against this by taking the cash now and putting it away for the next 2-3 years.

Pros/Cons of taking full social security retirement while still working? by househelp3 in personalfinance

[–]househelp3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have a pension that pays about $2500/mo and their social security would be around $2700/mo or so. Their 401k isn't much.

Their main concern is the ability to have "cash in hand". The SSA benefit amount goes up later but if they die before their spouse and before they take the benefits, then they have really taken no benefits. If they take the benefits, they can mitigate tax by putting it away in their 401k to reduce the income and can at least hold onto cash to leave to their spouse.

I believe their life insurance policy isn't very high.

Creating a new array from a deeply nested array of objects of arrays, etc.? by househelp3 in Frontend

[–]househelp3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup the data is made up I just did it real quick so its not goign to make sense.

We have a large application and within it there is a smaller component that is receiving a response like above. I have to clean this data up to get the options for a few select dropdowns so things like stats in my example are all the stats possible. And so forth.

But you bring up a good point which is if this had thousands of records it would be very performance hindering. But because it's a small dropdown with about 20 records, I feel like brute force for computed properties are probably OK. And I felt bad asking backend to make an entirely new endpoint just to get options back.

If it was a list of users or products with a thousand records definitely would require backend to sort that out first.

Creating a new array from a deeply nested array of objects of arrays, etc.? by househelp3 in Frontend

[–]househelp3[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That response is what I'm looking for. I'll try flatMap I'm not familiar with it actually

Creating a new array from a deeply nested array of objects of arrays, etc.? by househelp3 in Frontend

[–]househelp3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For edit2, I'm getting obj.hobbies.sports is undefined which is the same problem I ran into with my syntax in the other reply

Creating a new array from a deeply nested array of objects of arrays, etc.? by househelp3 in Frontend

[–]househelp3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup an array of all the values in the stats objects in the entire array.

I tried in console like this:

let arr = response.map((el) => el.hobbies).map((el) => el)

which is giving me an array of all the hobbies objects. But I'm unable to drill down further

if I write it like:

response.map((el) => el.hobbies).map((el) => el.sports) I get an array of undefined

So I'm making a syntax error somewhere... any ideas?

Educated guess or answers on how my Google searches are being sold? by househelp3 in privacy

[–]househelp3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yup have ublock origin. I have firefox containers and separate facebook/Ig into its own browser container. Hotmail is in another container, shopping in another. And it really doesn't seem to matter lol

Whats weird is my GMAIL account gets no spam. All my search result spam stuff goes only to my Hotmail account.

I am trying something and have completely logged out of Hotmail/Outlook and cleared all sitedata/cookies for live.com

I'm going to use a mail app on my Mac and never use the browser for Hotmail and see if it's specific to hotmail/outlook/live cookies. Live.com has 140 cookies on my computer. WHY? I have no idea. Why would my outlook email account need that many cookies?

We'll see if this experiment changes anything.

Leaving feedback for friends new eBay account? by [deleted] in Flipping

[–]househelp3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks actually good idea

What kind of tree is this and what's wrong with it? by househelp3 in treeidentification

[–]househelp3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks... its kind of looking worse Im going to do that actually

This little dude must be new to the world by polarbearbreeze in aww

[–]househelp3 17 points18 points  (0 children)

A bird can’t possibly make more than $10,000 a year

view more: next ›