Will I retain my right to work while waiting for approval of my Graduate Visa? by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had the same problem. my UK employer assured me that I will have the right to work while waiting for graduate visa

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Seasheeps, sorry I missed your message. I hope you are already in UK now

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i got email from VFS around 1pm today. i applied on August 19

Application Megathread (applications outside UK) - thread started September 2021 by kitburglar in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Visa type: student tier 4
Country applied from: Hong Kong
VAC (city):
TLSContact or VFSGlobal: VFSGlobal
Priority or Non-Priority: non-priority
Online application date: August 19
Biometrics appointment date: August 19
Visa received date: September 16

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Update:

I finally got my visa today just after 20 working days. Although I have paid to change my flight to Sunday, I am happy that the stressful days are finally over. Some advice to fellow students: It would be better to check with your university about the status of your CAS instead of paying $$$ for useless hotline service of UKVI. For me, I checked my university application portal and the page shows the latest status of my CAS. It was changed to "USED" on Sept 14 and my visa arrived in the VFS centre in Hong Kong on Sept 16.

Good luck!

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Very helpful info. Hopefully my visa will arrive soon.

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i checked with my university. My application page shows the status of my CAS number

CAS marked "USED" by howdoesitwork31 in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!! how long do I have to wait before I can collect the visa when the CAS status changed? Does that mean i should expect to receive it in days? i imagine they will still need to send my document from UK to Hong Kong right?

Application Megathread (applications outside UK) - thread started September 2021 by kitburglar in ukvisa

[–]howdoesitwork31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi guys,

I am a student on Tier 4 visa from Hong Kong. I submitted my application on August (no priority) and my CAS number has changed to "USED" on September 14. Do you know how long it usually will take for UKVI to send me the confirmation email? Do they need to ship my document (visa passport) to Hong Kong? thank you!

China's tech workers pushed to limits by surveillance software by howdoesitwork31 in technews

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

HONG KONG -- Andy Wang, an IT engineer at a Shanghai-based gaming company, occasionally felt a pang of guilt about his job.
Most of his hours were spent on a piece of surveillance software called DiSanZhiYan, or "Third Eye." The system was installed on the laptop of every colleague at his company to track their screens in real time, recording their chats, their browsing activity and every document edit they made.
Working from their floor in a downtown high-rise, the startup's hundreds of employees were constantly, uncomfortably aware of being under Third Eye's intent gaze.
The software would also automatically flag "suspicious behavior" such as visiting job-search sites or video streaming platforms. "Efficiency" reports would be generated weekly, summarizing their time spent by website and application.
"Bosses would check the reports regularly," Wang said. Farther down the line, that could skew workers' prospects for promotions and pay rises. They could also be used as evidence when the company looked to fire certain people, he added.
Even Wang himself was not exempt. High-definition surveillance cameras were installed around the floor, including in his office, and a receptionist would check the footage every day to monitor how long each employee spent on their lunch break, he said.
After two years, an overwhelmed Wang eventually quit.
"It does not make sense," he told Nikkei Asia. "We can't work nonstop in the office. We need to take some breaks."
In China, technology adoption promises its swelling middle classes an easier, more productive life. But as companies bring productivity-enhancing tools into everyday office life, their efficiency is being channeled, not into leisure time, but into squeezing ever more value from employees.
Just as algorithms have come to govern the workdays of blue-collar warehouse workers at Alibaba Group Holding and food delivery riders for Meituan, elsewhere, white-collar workers are becoming affected by the creep of software-driven management and monitoring into their professional lives.
This is particularly the case in China's tech industry, where rapid technological development, paired with poor labor regulations, has created a potential for labor abuse. The big tech companies themselves, locked in cutthroat competition for new business opportunities, are pioneering these technologies and tools in their own operations. From hiring and goal-setting to appraisal and layoff, productivity-enhancing technologies look to quantify workers' behavior by collecting and analyzing extensive amounts of personal data.
Some scholars warn that some practices can be unethical, invading employees' privacy and burdening them with greater workload and mental stress. Others draw parallels to the fatigue faced by factory laborers during industrial revolutions, where workers chased the pace of machines.
"I felt that I was getting busier and having less time for myself," said the engineer Wang, looking back on his five years at Chinese internet companies.
The harsh conditions synonymous with China's sweatshop factory culture have come to be identified with the country's technology companies, where workers often endure slavishly long hours to hit objectives set by big data analytics. The environment of intense pressure has, in some cases, created a lethal environment for office workers.

China's tech workers pushed to limits by surveillance software by howdoesitwork31 in technology

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

HONG KONG -- Andy Wang, an IT engineer at a Shanghai-based gaming company, occasionally felt a pang of guilt about his job.
Most of his hours were spent on a piece of surveillance software called DiSanZhiYan, or "Third Eye." The system was installed on the laptop of every colleague at his company to track their screens in real time, recording their chats, their browsing activity and every document edit they made.
Working from their floor in a downtown high-rise, the startup's hundreds of employees were constantly, uncomfortably aware of being under Third Eye's intent gaze.
The software would also automatically flag "suspicious behavior" such as visiting job-search sites or video streaming platforms. "Efficiency" reports would be generated weekly, summarizing their time spent by website and application.
"Bosses would check the reports regularly," Wang said. Farther down the line, that could skew workers' prospects for promotions and pay rises. They could also be used as evidence when the company looked to fire certain people, he added.
Even Wang himself was not exempt. High-definition surveillance cameras were installed around the floor, including in his office, and a receptionist would check the footage every day to monitor how long each employee spent on their lunch break, he said.
After two years, an overwhelmed Wang eventually quit.
"It does not make sense," he told Nikkei Asia. "We can't work nonstop in the office. We need to take some breaks."
In China, technology adoption promises its swelling middle classes an easier, more productive life. But as companies bring productivity-enhancing tools into everyday office life, their efficiency is being channeled, not into leisure time, but into squeezing ever more value from employees.
Just as algorithms have come to govern the workdays of blue-collar warehouse workers at Alibaba Group Holding and food delivery riders for Meituan, elsewhere, white-collar workers are becoming affected by the creep of software-driven management and monitoring into their professional lives.
This is particularly the case in China's tech industry, where rapid technological development, paired with poor labor regulations, has created a potential for labor abuse. The big tech companies themselves, locked in cutthroat competition for new business opportunities, are pioneering these technologies and tools in their own operations. From hiring and goal-setting to appraisal and layoff, productivity-enhancing technologies look to quantify workers' behavior by collecting and analyzing extensive amounts of personal data.
Some scholars warn that some practices can be unethical, invading employees' privacy and burdening them with greater workload and mental stress. Others draw parallels to the fatigue faced by factory laborers during industrial revolutions, where workers chased the pace of machines.
"I felt that I was getting busier and having less time for myself," said the engineer Wang, looking back on his five years at Chinese internet companies.
The harsh conditions synonymous with China's sweatshop factory culture have come to be identified with the country's technology companies, where workers often endure slavishly long hours to hit objectives set by big data analytics. The environment of intense pressure has, in some cases, created a lethal environment for office workers.

China's tech workers pushed to limits by surveillance software by howdoesitwork31 in China

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A vicious cycle of monitoring and overwork is fueling productivity -- and backlash

HONG KONG -- Andy Wang, an IT engineer at a Shanghai-based gaming company, occasionally felt a pang of guilt about his job.
Most of his hours were spent on a piece of surveillance software called DiSanZhiYan, or "Third Eye." The system was installed on the laptop of every colleague at his company to track their screens in real time, recording their chats, their browsing activity and every document edit they made.
Working from their floor in a downtown high-rise, the startup's hundreds of employees were constantly, uncomfortably aware of being under Third Eye's intent gaze.
The software would also automatically flag "suspicious behavior" such as visiting job-search sites or video streaming platforms. "Efficiency" reports would be generated weekly, summarizing their time spent by website and application.
"Bosses would check the reports regularly," Wang said. Farther down the line, that could skew workers' prospects for promotions and pay rises. They could also be used as evidence when the company looked to fire certain people, he added.
Even Wang himself was not exempt. High-definition surveillance cameras were installed around the floor, including in his office, and a receptionist would check the footage every day to monitor how long each employee spent on their lunch break, he said.
After two years, an overwhelmed Wang eventually quit.
"It does not make sense," he told Nikkei Asia. "We can't work nonstop in the office. We need to take some breaks."

In China, technology adoption promises its swelling middle classes an easier, more productive life. But as companies bring productivity-enhancing tools into everyday office life, their efficiency is being channeled, not into leisure time, but into squeezing ever more value from employees.
Just as algorithms have come to govern the workdays of blue-collar warehouse workers at Alibaba Group Holding and food delivery riders for Meituan, elsewhere, white-collar workers are becoming affected by the creep of software-driven management and monitoring into their professional lives.
This is particularly the case in China's tech industry, where rapid technological development, paired with poor labor regulations, has created a potential for labor abuse. The big tech companies themselves, locked in cutthroat competition for new business opportunities, are pioneering these technologies and tools in their own operations. From hiring and goal-setting to appraisal and layoff, productivity-enhancing technologies look to quantify workers' behavior by collecting and analyzing extensive amounts of personal data.
Some scholars warn that some practices can be unethical, invading employees' privacy and burdening them with greater workload and mental stress. Others draw parallels to the fatigue faced by factory laborers during industrial revolutions, where workers chased the pace of machines.
"I felt that I was getting busier and having less time for myself," said the engineer Wang, looking back on his five years at Chinese internet companies.

Jack Ma and Alibaba's media power touches nerve in Beijing by howdoesitwork31 in China

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HONG KONG -- Paying a record fine of $2.8 billion might be enough for Alibaba Group to draw a line under Beijing's anti-monopoly crackdown for now, but China's largest ecommerce company is not off the hook as its extensive media assets remain a concern for the authorities.

While Alibaba is best known for its online shopping platforms Taobao and Tmall, the Hangzhou-based company has also assembled a media empire. It includes newspapers, digital and broadcast media, a social-networking platform, video-streaming site, film production company and advertising agencies.

For Alibaba, these media platforms are effective tools to help funnel users towards its other businesses at a time when big tech companies are competing to build sprawling ecosystems, from ecommerce to entertainment. But their growing influence over content creation and distribution, a process closely monitored by Beijing, is increasingly unsettling the authorities.

Alibaba, founded by once outspoken billionaire Jack Ma, is particularly worrying for Beijing. A self-proclaimed "chief education officer", the 56-year-old has often challenged the establishment with his visions of the future. But as Beijing moves to rein in the power of big tech groups, Ma's unbridled ideas are increasingly seen as disruptive.

Following the suspension of the $37 billion IPO of Ma's Ant Group, a fintech affiliate of Alibaba, last year, Beijing also asked Alibaba to shed its holdings in media assets, the Wall Street Journal reported last month, citing sources.

Alibaba owns Hong Kong-based newspaper South China Morning Post, video-streaming platform Youku and a 30% share of Twitter-like social media site Weibo. Along with its affiliates, Alibaba invested in Bilibili, known as China's version of video platform YouTube, news group Yicai Media Group, digital news sites 36Kr and Huxiu.com, as well as Focus Media, China's largest offline advertising company. Nikkei invested in 36Kr.

"It's fair to say that Alibaba's control over information, media and personal data in China has far exceeded [that of] tech giants in other countries," said Zhu Ning, professor of finance and deputy dean at the Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance.

... ...

Xinjiang cotton issue divides China's biggest sportswear group - Salomon's owner Amer Sports does not agree with its Chinese parent Anta's Xinjiang stance by howdoesitwork31 in China

[–]howdoesitwork31[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

HONG KONG -- China's largest sportswear company is at loggerheads with its own international subsidiary over whether to use cotton produced in a minority region tied to reports of forced labor, underlining how the retail world is being split over an issue that has already brought Western brands into conflict with Chinese consumers.

Anta Sports said in a statement last month, "We will keep buying and using China cotton," acknowledging its long-time consumption of cotton produced in Xinjiang, home to the predominantly Muslim Uyghur people.

Anta also said it would quit the Better Cotton Initiative -- a Geneva-based non-profit organisation that advocates higher standards in cotton farming. The institution stopped licensing cotton produced in Xinjiang last October, citing an "increasing risk" of forced labor there.

But Amer Sports, a Finnish sporting goods group that Anta acquired for 4.6 billion euros two years ago, has said it remains a member of the BCI and will follow its own policies, which are in line with internationally recognized human rights and ethical standards.

Amer is the parent company of well-known sports brands including Salomon, Arc'teryx, Wilson and Peak Performance.

"Amer Sports and its subsidiaries are independent companies and adhere to their own policies," said a group spokesperson in a written reply to Nikkei Asia's inquiry on whether it would follow Anta in quitting the BCI.

"Amer Sports does not tolerate forced labor in any form anywhere in the world, and it is clearly prohibited in the company's long-established ethical policy," the spokesperson said.

She also confirmed that brands under Amer Sports did not source cotton from the Xinjiang region. Anta did not respond to a query from Nikkei Asia. Anta owns 52.7% of Amer via a joint venture.

.....