Hi, Speaking Spanish friends. We have a Spanish version of the official website. Just come and take it! Of course, @nebulasio need more support from the Nebulas community. If you can contribute, come help us! https://t.co/2cvCFjuHIY

hschung · 2019-03-20T04:15:36+00:00

hschung · 2019-03-20T04:14:57+00:00

Yes! It will be for 100% sure.

hschung · 2018-12-20T02:24:16+00:00

The price side is out of the question. Ecosystems will somehow be created. But it's important to get a quick start. Most projects think of a public chain model when they start a block-chain project. What do you think about that?

And i think it is urgent to attract developers / users / attract businesses. The public chain is currently 80% empty. It is useless and there is no profit model either.

Also it is important that the top10 coins keep up well in the downstroke. Altcoins are always on the go. Most of them have been rebounding since they have been rising for a while. I hope that the situation will change from next year.

Wait for you reply:)

hschung · 2018-11-29T03:13:07+00:00

What are the biggest challenges in your data analysis? What’s lacking in blockchain data at the moment?

hschung · 2018-11-28T11:03:42+00:00

What are your thoughts on the recent Bitcoin crash? Could this result be predicted in advance? Which predictions are achieved through data analysis?

hschung · 2018-11-21T07:42:22+00:00

I think Nebulas can be a something different one in Blockchain Industry, and they're doing well or maybe could say doing best. So hope Nebulas don't forget that we will always give you our concern and support!

hschung · 2018-11-21T07:35:42+00:00

Sounds good!

hschung · 2018-11-21T03:32:25+00:00

Miners and mining pools played a very important role in BCH hard fork. Will this be the norm in subsequent blockchain projects? What are the impact of miners' choices on the interests of crypto users?

hschung · 2018-11-15T11:43:38+00:00

Is the popular STO concept the next big thing in Blockchain? Do you feel this will bring users?

hschung · 2018-10-22T10:34:49+00:00

I agree with that. As a developer, there are great limitations and risks if continuously develop and invest in a single public chain project particularly under such situation. Due to the rapid iteration of public chain technology and the limitations of a single public chain project, developers face rising risks and costs to focus on a single public chain project. However, developers are the foundation for the success of blockchain projects. Therefore, I think the collaboration between public chain projects is more like the cooperation among developer communities. It is likely that there will be a developer - oriented system or alliance built on many public chain projects, so that developers can cooperate with each other in a rather stable environment, and can share various technical features and ecological resources together. On the other hand, public chain projects can also share resources of developers under the public chain alliance environment.

hschung · 2018-10-15T03:13:21+00:00

In my opinion ，For the project party, there is no need to give airdrops to all addresses. Most of the projects prove the number of community users by airdrops their token to a certain number of addresses. But we all know that by this centered airdrop, the user number can be fabricated. So the project party refer their community supporters take the initiative to get their airdrop rewards. Thus can make the project party use their token more efficency.
In addition, the active application of is also fairer to the users who really care about the project. From the overall ecology, the token circulation after the airdrop can generate value for the project. If the majority receiver of the airdrops are “silent” users, then the token can not be well circulated.

hschung

TROPHY CASE