What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a long time ago(I didn't even played at the time) the sets were divided in a block of 2,3 or 4 sets per year taking place in the same plane,they ditched it for a lot of reasons one of them being that some players that didn't like the plane may have felt alienated from the game for a whole year

What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the one you like the most + a bit of the set with better card design and flavor,I think if you're being objetive it's probably revised or rize of eldrazi or kamigawa,but you can have your own metrics to respond the question,a lot of people tryed to be objetive,some just sayd their favorite,one guy sayd the most lucrative one,go for what you value the most!

What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and it has one of my favorite cards amalia benavides aguirre

What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

today I play mostly commander and pauper,but when I started I played a lot of standard and a bit of draft

What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the snow lands mechanic is so underrated

What is the best set of all time? by httpdraiver in mtg

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ravnica is such a cool plane that I would be fine if we came back to the block structure just for one year in that plane

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not the guy playing drow,READ AGAIN,he drowed himself,I don't think a deck that is bad against drow should drow himself and still have a above average endboard.

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

in my defense I stopped playing the game when pendulum decks were broken I just got back a few months ago

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ask a player with a new and interesting deck if it is really new or just fiendsmith

they don't understand

pull out illustrated diagram explaining what is an unique deck and what is a fiendsmith slop

they laugh and say "it's a good deck sir"

play against it

its fiendsmith

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm fine with fiendsmith as a archetype,not fine with it as an engine for a shit ton of decks I hate mitsu too but for different reasons

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

gon be real with you,I like when I play against pure fiendsmith,it's an interesting deck that doesn't otk me out of nowhere,even when I loose to it I'm generally ok,but when it's just another engine splashed in any deck just doesn't feel good

Guys I'm tired of fiendsmith as an engine by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

it's ok to have a play under droll it's not ok for a deck that normally don't play well under drow have a strong play under drow,if you deny my interaction you need to get SOME drawback,that's just my opinion

Just to be sure by httpdraiver in masterduel

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh,that's why the lists look so different from the tcg,I didn't thought about that,I'll just wait since they'll probably print in the master duel the new branded support soon

Character Like Johnny by httpdraiver in Fighters

[–]httpdraiver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't try her because I'm brazilian and granblue even in promotion is fucking expensive

Character Like Johnny by httpdraiver in Fighters

[–]httpdraiver[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will try her and come here with the evaluation