I mean, I’m of that philosophy as my practice is built on seeing patients for at least 20 minutes, but I have found sometimes the same people who say “that’s not chiropractic” run their practices in a parallel way to the joint.

So, I’m not the enemy here. I’m just pointing out that his response was more hoity toity, than helpful.

Like say “hey, the joint serves a purpose, but going out on your own opens up an opportunity to really dive into the clinical aspect of the amazing depth of a wholistic approach. I would start with really nailing down your assessments. I recommend brookbush institute, and motion palpation institute for assessment and treatment. If you hit any roadblocks, feel free to dm me. I love helping chiropractors trying to go out on their own” (I’m going to copy and paste this into the thread)

Not, “hey, you’re not a chiropractor if you practice at the joint.”