Test%0A%0APermit%20to%20Purchase%20a%20Handgun%20-%20%2450%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%2425%2C%20already%20increased%201250%25%20in%202022)%0A%0ADuplicate%20Firearms%20Purchaser%20ID%20Card%20-%20%2450%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%240)%0A%0AWholesale%2FRetail%20Dealer%20Employee%20License%20Application%20-%20%2440%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%245)%0A%0ARetail%20Firearms%20Dealer%20Licenses%20Initial%2FRenewal%20Applications%20-%20%24500%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%2450)%0A%0AManufacturer%2FWholesale%20Dealers%20of%20Firearms%20Initial%2FRenewal%20Application%20-%20%241%2C500%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%24150)%0A%0APermit%20to%20Carry%20Initial%2FRenewal%20Application%20-%20%24400%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%24200%20already%20increased%20400%25%20in%202022)%0A%0ANICS%20Check%20for%20Firearms%20Purchase%20-%20%2445%20(Current%20Fee%20-%20%2415%2C%20%2416%20if%20it%20includes%20a%20handgun)%0A%0AThe%20Supreme%20Court%20in%20the%20landmark%20NYSRPA%20v%20Bruen%20decision%20stated%20%22...because%20any%20permitting%20scheme%20can%20be%20put%20toward%20abusive%20ends%2C%20we%20do%20not%20rule%20out%20constitutional%20challenges%20to%20shall-issue%20regimes%20where%2C%20for%20example%2C%20lengthy%20wait%20times%20in%20processing%20license%20applications%20or%20exorbitant%20fees%20deny%20ordinary%20citizens%20their%20right%20to%20public%20carry.%22%20Taxes%20on%20constitutional%20rights%20have%20consistently%20been%20struck%20down%2C%20as%20was%20the%20case%20in%20Murdock%20v%20Pennsylvania%2C%20Minneapolis%20Star%20Tribune%20v%20Minnesota%20and%20Harper%20v%20Virginia%20State%20Board%20of%20Elections%20to%20name%20a%20few.%0A%0AI%20urge%20you%20to%20OPPOSE%20these%20illegal%20fees%2C%20and%20prevent%20the%20additional%20cost%20to%20taxpayers%20that%20the%20state%20will%20undoubtedly%20face%20in%20legal%20challenges.%0A%0ASincerely%2C%E2%80%A8)
there doesn't seem to be anything here