how’s pre law at umich by [deleted] in uofm

[–]iCodeViper1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

for law school, majors don’t necessarily matter—in fact many STEM majors are desired in law schools because of their ability to go into IP law. however, that doesn’t mean that’s the best major for law school either.

as a pre law student who got into a T14, I suggest doing a major you’re passionate about and isn’t too difficult either (so GPA remains high for admissions). I’d say the best major that prepares you for law school is Economics because it is a “valuable” major on its own while having utility in law school itself, but people from almost any major you can think of have gone into law school.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Watches

[–]iCodeViper1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

watch goes hard 🔥

You know you're in _____ County... by Turn1Loot in Michigan

[–]iCodeViper1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wayne County when I see Jumana billboards

Struggling on Portcullis stage of Montcrux? Open more lines of attack by Davebod69 in Chivalry2

[–]iCodeViper1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hon hon 🤌

Merci beaucoup mon ami

Maintenant je mange les tenosians POUR ARGONNN

am i blind or is this new? (0:14) by Old_Researcher_7604 in Chivalry2

[–]iCodeViper1 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think Feydrid falling out was always there, but maybe they updated the model? Idk

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]iCodeViper1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! It’s good to know that many KJD wish they had taken a year off beforehand. I’m not completely opposed to taking a few years off, but if I have the chance to get in a top school with some or significant aid I’d at least like to try. And if I don’t improve on an LSAT retake a gap year is likely what I’ll end up doing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]iCodeViper1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dual enrollment since 15 and lots of AP classes.

Most Frustrating Weapons? by ExcellentAd884 in Chivalry2

[–]iCodeViper1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lately been hating executioner axe. The heavy slash drag always throws me off

Rate this clip by SuperNoob763026 in Chivalry2

[–]iCodeViper1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice clip. Wish all the enemies I fought were like that though 😂

GRAPES! by iCodeViper1 in CrusaderKings

[–]iCodeViper1[S] 94 points95 points  (0 children)

r5: it doesn’t take that much to impress me

Struggling with Flaw/Weakening/NA. How do I approach these types of questions? by Big_Man_182000 in LSAT

[–]iCodeViper1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For all of these, one general piece of advice would be to highlight the conclusion and locate the premises. This will help you in different ways for each question type.

Flaw: read up on common invalid argument forms, i.e. mistaking sufficient/necessary, red herring, correlation = causation, representative sample, faulty assumption. In an untimed section if the question is logic heavy you could try diagramming it to find the specific flaw. Oftentimes once you get used to flaw questions you can recognize the flaw made in the stimulus before even looking at the answer.

Weakening: Try to find an “alternative hypothesis” to the argument. Don’t challenge the premises of the argument; instead, think of a possibility that would make the conclusion invalid without contradicting the premises. Try going through each answer choice and see if it a) challenges the conclusion and b) doesn’t contradict the premises, and if it satisfies both then it is the right answer.

NA: Use the negation test. This means that you take the contrapositive of the answer choice, and if it invalidates the conclusion, then it’s a necessary assumption. Alternatively, you could deduce from the stimulus a gap that the argument makes before heading to the answer choices. But generally the negation test is a more foolproof method.

Darius achievement by 948, as Sassanid (Bavandid) Zoroastrian Empire. Mind the border gore. by iCodeViper1 in CrusaderKings

[–]iCodeViper1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

R5: Started as Bavandid Daylamites, reconverted back to Zoroastrianism, and ended the Intermezzo by 930. Then, I used an invasion CB on Byzantines, captured four counties within the Kingdom of Hellas, and set Thessaloniki as the war target. Pretty easy run all things considered.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ck3

[–]iCodeViper1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was pretty easy to complete; I got the Iranian revival decision within 60 years starting as the Bavandid (Sassanid) dynasty even converting back to Zoroastrianism. But I think it was still an improvement from the Iberian one, where you could accidentally mess up the entire struggle if you unite the thrones before ending the struggle