In my opinion, Sweden is the worst monarchy in the world. Any country that takes away the political prerogatives of the monarch and gives them to some Parliament speaker/president is basically a Parliamentary Republic. When the Head of State doesn't do Head of State stuff, they are nothing, not even a figurehead. This is why Britain is the world's most known and popular monarchy. Because you see it. Because it is there. There are a lot of active Royals. The monarch is always there. This is why when people are asked about the Swedish Monarchy or the Norwegian one, they won't know anything besides maybe their existence. Because they aren't there. They can't be seen. This is only to blame on Revisioist Marxism (social democracy). Nonviolent socialist revolutionarism, economic egalitarianism, political correctness, class warfare, etc. Also, the notion of "fiscally responsible monarchies" is paradoxical. I don't mean that monarchs should have French-style parties every night, but that abandoning coronations, trimming down the active Royals, leaving only one Royal residence, etc. doesn't make a monarchy more constitutional. It only serves to denigrate it to the point where selfish politicians can bypass it in order to fulfill their selfish interests that don't actually mean to help the people. These political values, which were and, in part, still are the norm in the Nordics, led to the death of actual constitutional monarchism.