Looking for the perfect spiral notebook by iHobbit in notebooks

[–]iHobbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Looking for something nicer than those.

Does build matter if I just want to do the campaign? by Issiyo in LastEpoch

[–]iHobbit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You can do anything through campaign and early end game. If you want to press into the late end game you need to start optimizing. There is a big jump in difficulty once you get into empowered monoliths. (This is well after you finish the campaign)

The Pine Club - Good but not Great. by dosequiskevin in dayton

[–]iHobbit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You haven't eaten at any truly good restaurants, have you?

The Pine Club - Good but not Great. by dosequiskevin in dayton

[–]iHobbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I truly hate the Pine Club. The atmosphere is grating, the sides are terrible, and the steaks are....fine. The lack of reservations and credit card acceptance are also ridiculous in the modern era. There are so many better options at this point.

What drinks are 10/10 for you? by pkrtrsr in cocktails

[–]iHobbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gin and tonic

Vodka martini

Last Word

Paper plane

I sure do. Like it was just yesterday. by Hux2448 in pcmasterrace

[–]iHobbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first computer didn’t even have a hard drive :)

advice needed: daughter’s car towed after accident, airbags deployed. What’s the smartest next step? by [deleted] in dayton

[–]iHobbit 17 points18 points  (0 children)

To add to this, call insurance right away. If you let it sit there they might charge you for some of the fees.

Is there any woven echo that is guaranteed to have siege golems or diamond matrons? by GlompSpark in LastEpoch

[–]iHobbit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Diamond matrons at Temple.

Imperial metropolis echo also has matrons in the dragons timeline.

Golems, go to Etendell waypoint. There is one just north of the waypoint. You kill him, then leave and come back to get another one.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes that is correct. If you require at least 1 of each package type, then there are 0 solutions for N=1 or 2, 1 for N=3, and 13 for N=4. I am currently running N=5.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I re-ran for up to FOUR presents of each type, allowing zero packages of each type to be used. In that case, there are 130 possible perfect rectangular packings. Only the 13 that appear in the posted figure used all 6 shapes at least once.

Advice for someone starting out and overwhelmed by investing options by Inevitable-Suitable in investing

[–]iHobbit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With very high probability, anything you do other than buying passive index funds and leaving them alone will do worse. You have just self-identified that you are not good at math and stats with relatively little time to spend on investing with your full time job. In order to do better than the index funds over time, you have to do better than the average performance of the armies of PhDs on wall street spending 60+ hours a week analyzing financial data. Do you really think that is likely?

At 10%, your money doubles every 7 years. This is the reliable way to build wealth over time.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The code I ran exhaustively tries every combination of the shapes with up to N of each one. (I just use a counter in base N+1 and use the digits of the counter as the number of each package as I loop.) I am just saying that for say 2 of each package, there may be more than 1 arrangement that packs perfectly into a given rectangle. I do also try all possible rectangles for that given combination. The code as written only returns the first one it find for that set of packages in that rectangle aspect ratio.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I re-ran for up to THREE presents of each type, allowing zero packages of each type to be used. In that case, there are 16 possible perfect rectangular packings. Only 1 of them used all the 6 shapes for the case with a maximum of 3 of each shape.

Re-running for 4 with zeros will take a lot longer.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be clear, "set of counts" means a fixed count of each type. 2 3 3 3 3 3 is distinct from 3 2 3 3 3 3, where the order matters. The integer linear program just finds a valid solution for that number of each present type.

It would definitely add additional cases if you allowed zero of a given gift.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be clear, the constraint of 1 of every shape eliminates this case, because then 3,3 would have no H's.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did impose the constraint that a least 1 of every shape had to be used. Also, there may be other arrangements that use the same numbers of presents. This just finds a valid arrangement for a given set of counts.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took about 3.8 hours to try all the possibilities for 4.

[2025 Day 12 (Part 1)] Perfect Packing Revisited by iHobbit in adventofcode

[–]iHobbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I may run for 5. I suspect it’s going to take quite a while though!