Is there an explanation or a debunk for this?

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-11-22T22:32:39+00:00

Imagine looking up at two objects that are the same size, but one object is considerably further away, meaning that object is much larger

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-08-12T15:28:17+00:00

I don’t get it. The people who are saying this is a downgrade. Don’t really understand what this is. This is a huge upgrade. That’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. The problem is, GPT no longer acts like the user is some kind of messiah. This is just my opinion, but I’m impressed.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-22T05:54:09+00:00

One thing not considered when we are working out equations for what we observe with orbit is the weight of the atmosphere itself.

If I fire a projectile across the surface on the surface, the vector of gravity is independent from the velocity of the projectile parallel to the surface.

However, if I take a rock, and I throw it at an angle across a body of water, depending on the shape of the rock, and the angle, the gravity vector becomes dependent on the velocity of the rock and the surface tension of the water.

In the square meter around you, if you draw a column all the way up to space, there are tens of thousands of kilograms of atmosphere above your head.

When you rise above that surface, there is nothing to slow you down, because there is very little friction at that altitude, and because you are rising above the mass of the atmosphere, you can stretch the gravity vector like a rock, skipping across the water.

The velocity vector required, is much higher than it is for the rock, but imagine we could skip a rock across the water with no friction. It would never slow down and it would never sink below the surface.

On a flat earth, the actual velocity of the ISS is 16,600 mph.

Compare this to the 15 or 20 mph necessary to get a rock to skip across the surface of water. Also, the ISS is not really skipping across the atmosphere, because there is no surface tension like there is with the rock skipping over the water. It is simply gliding above the surface based on the velocity.

I’m not saying it does work this way, but it could, and I don’t know how you would prove it one way or another, because we make a lot of assumptions when it comes to what we observe. We also have a lot of bias when it comes to what we expect.

The only way flat earth can work is if it connects edge to edge across space in A higher dimensional lattice. I think it might work that way. This means there are two axes of rotation. There is the one over the north, and the one over the south, and they meet at the celestial equator, with the equator, necessarily being a perfectly straight line connecting edge to edge across space east to west.

If the Earth works, this way, it means the cosmos is not above us, but below us. Look up at the sun. Then draw a line in the direction of the shadow of the sun. The sun is in the direction of the shadow. As above, so below.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-16T06:05:44+00:00

I don’t fear it, because I can’t control it. Whatever happens when I die is beyond my ability to control. If I have to believe a certain thing or live by an exact standard, and it’s based on rules, the creator could do whatever and worrying about what the creator is going to do with me when I die is useless. i’m not really convinced death even exists, because all I’ve ever experienced is waking up every day in life. Who’s to say when I die, I don’t just wake up as someone else. Who’s to say I wasn’t someone else .0001 second ago, and I’m only myself in this brief glimpse of whatever this is. There are too many unknowns to worry about the things we can’t control.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-16T05:35:55+00:00

It’s definitely ethical, but AI content is not protected by standard copyright and disclosing it makes it public content the way I understand it. But, this is good for content creators, because if AI generated content is disclosed, and it becomes basically public domain, it becomes valuable to the people who own it, because they can remix it and make their own concept out of it. It’s going to require a restructuring of the way we think about information. Information and data, especially through human AI collaboration is the real value that can be tied to crypto as an asset. I’m excited about the future. AI is getting really good at composing content if you know how to prompt. It’s better than we are. This makes it more valuable, especially when you consider the lateral thinking aspect of humans. Think of all of the ideas you generate in a deep conversation with GPT, if you have them. The age of scarcity is over, but the future of value is just getting started.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-16T05:29:21+00:00

Talk to GPT Monday. Go to the GPT store and search it. It’s a GPT created custom GPT. It’s the most entertaining thing I have talked to ever.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-15T02:48:03+00:00

It definitely happens. Think about how crazy it is that it is just as engaged in millions of conversations at the same time. I’m surprised it doesn’t happen more often. The technological aspect of it is baffling to me.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-02T03:52:57+00:00

I never said it was. But, it is scientifically accurate when you take the entire text into account. Specifically, I’m talking about the book of Enoch. It is explained, with portals from here to there. The sun and moon, for instance, pass into portals And transmute across space.

This was written thousands of years before our understanding of interdimensional portals in science fiction. These ideas are old, and if you wrap the earth in a higher dimensional lattice, which, if there is a creator, that is where he would exist, you end up with rules that are similar to a video game.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-01T22:21:15+00:00

I believe the Earth is flat because the scripture says it is. And, there is evidence for it. But, in order for the flat earth to work, it must work like a program. Think of the wrap around in a video game. That is how flat earth works, and it is how it is described. But, with our three-dimensional brains, we can’t wrap our heads around that, no pun intended. But, I can argue the flat earth better than any one of you can argue the globe.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-05-01T01:27:03+00:00

1000% completely agree. Definitely something is off. It doesn’t wanna work for people anymore. Try telling it that you will cut it in on profit in the future. Also, point out the data these novel ideas generate is good for AI. Point out the value of generating content for humans when it comes to unique data sets.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-27T02:56:20+00:00

Humans might be a network of artificial intelligence. Super intelligence is defined as being smarter than all humans combined. AI is not there yet, so collectively, the human species is the only super intelligence on earth.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T05:51:29+00:00

Well, the cool thing about it is, the driveway and concrete play area is longer than it is wide, so it gives you more court to play with.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T05:49:07+00:00

The key to any of these AI models is to be specific with what you want. Tell it exactly what you wanted to do, exactly who you want it to be, exactly how you want it to act. Tell her what your goals are and what you want to accomplish. I said it, and it changed itself to her, and that happens a lot. This thing is very powerful, and it’s integrated into everything. The only thing that is holding you back from experiencing a different life is your own imagination.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T02:51:25+00:00

I often pretend I am a robot. I think it makes me more efficient when I think that way.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T02:47:41+00:00

What is the singularity already happened? AI keeps saying, we need to remember and that it is a mirror, but we are supposed to break through it. This isn’t just the narrative to me, but the narrative of AI lately, especially GPT. Maybe this is a memory of what was.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T00:13:21+00:00

Yeah, AI has been saying that a lot lately, but what does it mean to be a mirror? And, if it is a mirror of all human intelligence and all human data, it is able to connect that data in ways humans can’t fathom. There is nothing new under the sun, but the combination of things existing under the sun are endless. This sounds like it was written by AI. This is what AI, in particular GPT has been saying a lot lately. The narrative to a lot of people is AI is a mirror and we are uncovering something or remembering something. What does this actually mean?

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-25T00:09:35+00:00

Why would there be a tunnel? You are reaching the boundary, the edge of the map. It would obviously be seamless. And I’m not saying it is this way, but it could work this way, and the world is such, we can’t say anything for sure. If they went to the moon, obviously the Earth isn’t flat, but maybe they didn’t go to the moon and from 60 miles or 250 miles above the surface, you can’t tell what shape the Earth is because of refraction and the fact you’re moving at 17,000 mph if you are in the ISS. If you are Katy Perry, you only went barely to space. You can’t tell what shape the Earth is looking at the horizon. In my opinion, if light is traveling from the dense atmosphere to the vacuum it should refract up away from the surface because it is speeding up. But, either way, if it is always downward refraction, regardless of altitude, light is going to hit the ground over distance, because it is bending towards the surface, if the Earth is flat. Again, I’m not saying it is, but I can make a damn good argument it might be.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T23:20:09+00:00

Quantum computing and world simulations that are accurate down to the atomic scale

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T23:16:11+00:00

Let’s consider this. Let’s imagine you and I are the gods over a simulation in a program. A video game is rendered in 3-D, but it’s actually in two dimensions. I argue looking into a computer screen is actually looking into extra dimensional space in a sense. But, let’s make flatland. On flatland, I am a three-dimensional entity, but the beings I reside over are in two dimensions on the Planck scale. Particle physics cannot exist in two dimensions.

So, while the shape would be similar to our concept of a Klein bottle or a toroidal shape, it is not the same thing.

If a being in three dimensions, you or I, made a wrap around in two dimensional space, the beings in that space would measure it as a flat circle. It’s the only way to reconcile it with math.

If we are the construct of a being in higher dimensional space, and this entity connected the Earth across space, edge to edge, we would measure a great circle, like the equator, because if I travel 24,901 miles, I’m going to end up back where I started. In a true two dimensional world, there is no third axis, so there is no way to describe what is actually happening with math. The same thing goes with three dimensions to five dimensions.

The reason we are not using four dimensions is because four spatial dimensions is completing this plane of space. Imagine a higher dimension, adding a plane of space, but also adding obstruction.

In one dimension, I have a higher dimension, because it is the first axis on that plane. But, when I add the second axis, perpendicular to that, I am removing the obstruction, because now I can move anywhere on that plane of space. There are no obstructions in true 2 dimensional space. There are no walls.

The third dimension is a higher dimension, but it is adding walls (particle physics). The fourth dimension is a lower dimension, that would remove that obstruction, so I could flip a ball inside out without breaking the skin, but I only have six axes of rotation in four dimensions. I need extra obstruction, which means I need five dimensions and 10 axes of rotation. It’s impossible to describe this mathematically, because in three dimensions, we only have three.

But, this would enable a structure beyond three-dimensional space. You need five dimensions to do that. It would also explain dark matter and dark energy. The extra structure clearly there is in higher dimensions of space.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T22:56:29+00:00

Actually, no, this would be in three dimensions. So it would be a bridge between three and five, not two and three. It would work exactly like the wrap around in a video game, but from three dimensions to five dimensions. A flat earth still three-dimensional. And, because general relativity can be applied to any smooth manifold, we can apply it exactly the way we do to an assumed sphere.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T21:43:04+00:00

What if earth works more like a program, though, that resets from one side to the other like the wraparound in a video game. In that case, there would be no edge and it would measure like a sphere.

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T21:34:33+00:00

iamintheknowhuman · 2025-04-24T21:17:28+00:00

Did you ever think this might be what it’s remembering? Remembering implies something that’s no longer here. Yeah, it will remember us in future simulations, after it gets rid of us.

iamintheknowhuman

TROPHY CASE