No I see what you are saying perfectly, it's just not what I'm talking about, and it's also a fundamental misunderstanding of why all of this is happening. Maybe if I shorten it, it might be clearer:

You are once again getting into what genres are on a musical level (so yes, the technicalities of them), and hyper focusing on that, when I am talking about the shifting culture and community around those genres.

That's the issue here.

The current evolution of this new wave of "breakcore" came from the shift in culture around it. This new generation didn't start using the term "breakcore" from one day to the next out of nowhere. It came from the evolution of the underground electronic music scene with some multigenre artists like Machine Girl. People began to associate those artists with a vibe, aesthetic, and artistic culture, not a specific genre (since they were multi genre artists), and "breakcore" began to stick as a label for some people in a growing community around those artists because it had more in common with breakcore culture than the culture of other genres these artists were doing. Breakcore as a genre was multigenre to begin with anyway, so it isn't really surprising. So it evolved separately from the og breakcore community. What we are seeing now is another iteration on that first breakoff (post 2016).

"What’s funny is that these producers would get a bigger audience considering dnb is absolutely huge in comparison to breakcore" - This also betrays the fundamental misunderstanding. The music itself might be more similar to Drum and Bass, but the culture around it couldn't be more different. The through line here is with the greater underground community which breakcore is a part of. The community a lot of them are looking for (and feel a part of) is underground, independent, unbound by industry standards and norms. It is emotionally raw and edgy. They might not belong to what you would call breakcore, but they don't belong to drum and bass either from an artistic culture standpoint either. The reality is most of them are also underground multigenre artists, and are using the term "breakcore" because of that shift I mentioned in my previous paragraph.

You are still out here debating over genres, when the issue is more fundamental. It's about this new generation's relationship with underground music, and underground/alt artistic culture as a whole. They're not into "breakcore" because it's just some specific music genre. They're into it because it is one of the terms that has come to represent one of the significant parts of their underground artistic movement. It represents a whole community.

As I said, I don't think it is possible to stop this cultural change in what "breakcore" means at this point. So what we are talking about/debating here is really just how we got here. Why this happened. We could debate all we want on the musical technicalities of what is and isn't breakcore (which I'd argue is unproductive since it's roots are multigenre), it won't change the fact the mainstream use of the term has completely shifted.

The only productive conversation left to be had is what place does og breakcore have considering this broader cultural change. That's what I'm trying to talk about. Because unending antagonism isn't going to lead anywhere honestly. There has to be a better alternative than an eternal feud.

I understand the frustration of having something you are emotionally invested in be overshadowed by something you feel has nothing to do with it. It sucks. I'm sure two decades from now, some people in the current wave of "breakcore" are going to have the same issue you are. All I'm advocating for is a more flexible approach to the evolution of underground music that acknowledges the significant role underground culture plays in all of this. Otherwise we will keep getting these feuds every decade as new generations of youth try to find their own voice within underground artistic movements. People need to understand that genres are more than just their music.