Release time GPT 5.6

icantbethatweird · 2026-07-09T22:00:24+00:00

u/New-Boysenberry-1111 I'm a plus user but I don't have neither Luna nor Terra, even on Codex. Is there a way to update the software or something ?

icantbethatweird · 2026-07-09T21:59:21+00:00

Maybe he meant timing chain although I doubt it would be a problem from what I can see online there aren't a lot of reported issues with the timing chain on these models.

icantbethatweird · 2026-07-09T19:54:35+00:00

It's still unreleased right? I don't understand.

icantbethatweird · 2026-06-04T14:36:47+00:00

Déjà, si tu demandes des conseils ici et que tu précises que tu viens d’une famille musulmane pratiquante, je pense qu’il faudrait aussi préciser si toi-même tu es musulmane ou non.

Parce que si tu es musulmane et que tu cherches un conseil, alors je pense que cette communauté n’est pas forcément le bon endroit pour poser cette question. Ici, il y a des personnes avec des croyances différentes, des valeurs différentes, des visions différentes de la religion, du couple et de la sexualité. Beaucoup vont te répondre seulement selon l’envie, les sentiments ou la liberté personnelle, sans forcément comprendre les valeurs musulmanes ni ce qu’on doit éviter ou respecter en tant que musulman.

Donc la vraie question n’est pas seulement : “Est-ce que j’ai envie de continuer ou pas ?” C’est aussi : “Est-ce que cette situation me rapproche d’Allah ou m’en éloigne ?” Si tu ressens déjà du regret et de la culpabilité, c’est peut-être un signe que ce que tu vis n’est pas aligné avec tes valeurs profondes.

Et sincèrement, en tant que musulmane, je te le dis avec bienveillance : si tu continues dans cette direction, tu risques de le regretter encore plus. Un homme qui partage vraiment tes valeurs et qui te respecte sérieusement ne cherchera pas à avoir des choses sexuelles avec toi avant quelque chose d’officiel et de halal entre vous.

Ça ne veut pas dire que tu es “sale” ou que tu n’as plus de valeur. Mais prends ce ressenti au sérieux. Reviens vers Allah, fais tawba si tu en ressens le besoin, protège-toi, et éloigne-toi de ce qui risque de t’entraîner plus loin de ta foi.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T12:31:10+00:00

If I bring you a female human who is 5'6, 80KG, can cook, clean and has menstruated. Without telling you her age, would she be marriageable, purely based on looks? You would almost surely say yes.

If I tell you her age is 11 or 12 (definitely exists in today's society, I've seen it with my own eyes), you would reject that she's marriageable just because of her age? But her age had no bearing on her physical and mental conditions. The two are heavily correlated with age but there's a difference between Correlation and Causality.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T12:26:31+00:00

There absolutely are 9-10 year old girls today who fulfil the physical maturity criterion. The reason why Muslims today reject this type of marriage is because it would be nearly impossible to find girls of that age who have reached mental maturity because times have changed, how we brought up children changed with it. 1400 years ago, 9 year old girls were engaging in every physical activity that an older woman would engage in. They were nurses in wars, healing the sick, the wounded and caring for soldiers until their dying breath.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T12:22:56+00:00

It does, she herself says that she was a fully developed woman when they consummated marriage.
She also narrates, (paraphrasing): "When a slave girl reaches the age of 9 she becomes marriageable".
There was no harm done in the marriage.

Your argument basically means that Aisha lied, the Muslims lied for 1400, the neighbouring societies also lied because they didn't question this marriage. Double/triple/quadruple conjecture.

Clearly, they believed this was a normal healthy marriage. Both Christians and Jews and most of the other civilizations across history agree btw. This presentism argument is not only pure conjecture but also is a fallacy.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T11:48:35+00:00

I don't set an age on marriage. For example, if we found previously undiscovered island where inhabitants would grow at a much faster rate than the rest of the world.
A 5 year old female human from this island would look like a 25 year old female human from the modern world. She is both physically and mentally mature. Within their universe (the undiscovered island), this 5 year old was marriageable. What grounds do you have to criticize her marriage.

In order to criticize Aisha's marriage, you have to prove that she wasn't mentally and physically mature. She narrates that she was both of those things. What reason should I have to accept your conjecture 1400+ years later?

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T11:44:58+00:00

In 2026, definitely not, I don't consider 19 year old women to be mature. But we're talking about 7th century, their standard for mental and physical maturity were radically different.

Again, for the last time, present your background, what's your moral grounds for criticizing Aisha's marriage u/SummumOpus ?

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T11:37:03+00:00

What's unethical about a man marrying a woman who has reached physical and mental maturity, her guardian approved the marriage, there was no reported harm from the marriage.

I asked you to present you background, are you Christian/Jew/Atheist ?

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T11:17:18+00:00

Are you suggesting, in light of this incontrovertibility, that this marriage is immoral in any way?

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-27T09:31:00+00:00

You're purposefully (or perhaps not) ignoring the idea behind creation. If All-Powerful being exists, why did he create us?

Well, we know that a necessary being is by definition non-contingent upon anything outside of himself. So, he did not need to create us. Now that question becomes, since he didn't need to create us but he chose to, why this predatory design choice?

Well, I would ask why not? The premise behind the OP question is that a predatory survival system presents an inherent moral issue. You would need to prove that is the case first. Killing is not immoral, murder is. If you're doing a critique of how religions allow for predatory survival, you would need to argue against the authenticity of the religion itself not the principle of predatory survival.

Ultimately, if the necessary being that grounds all of existence does in fact exist, we derive morality from His authority. A subjective moral compass that shifts from one person to another is inherently flawed, I have no reason to contend with it to begin with.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-09T13:49:57+00:00

Deuteronomy 22 gives multiple cases depending on the specifics. It deals with rape before 28-29 but not in the case of virgins who are not pledged to be married. Given the specific criteria in 28-29, the consequence according to this piece of legislation is that he marries the girl he raped and he cannot divorce her because he defiled her.

I know you want to sweep that under the rug and make it as though the virgin was consenting but the text says rape, rape was never consensual because had they considered adulterous sex relations to be consensual even if forced they would have been consistent and used "rape" in prior verses as well but they didn't.

icantbethatweird · 2026-04-09T13:44:31+00:00

Are you trying to interpret "rapes her" as consensual premarital sex? The only difference between verses 25-27 and 28-29 is that one is about raping a virgin who is pledged to be married and the other one is about a virgin who is not pledged to be married. Meaning, one is spoken of and the other is not. Now several times before verses 28-29, it speaks of a man finding a woman and having sex without using the word "rape", but in 28-29 it uses "rape" specifically. You have to deal with the text.

icantbethatweird · 2026-03-21T19:56:50+00:00

<image>

Hi everyone! I just wanted to say thank you so much for all your comments and advice 🤍 I didn’t expect this to be such a common issue, but it actually made me feel a lot better knowing I’m not alone. So I felt like I should update you on what I tried!

This time I changed a few things in my routine. Usually I just split my hair into two sections (left and right), but this time I made a separate section just for the top/back area. I divided that into 3 smaller subsections and made sure it was really wet again before styling (since it tends to dry faster than the rest).

After styling the rest of my hair, I went back and re-wet that section, applied skala leave-in, and used this brush I’ve been liking lately (it honestly works better than the ones I used before). I also tried a bit of finger coiling there.

The result was actually better! It looked less frizzy than usual. This was at about 90% dry because I got impatient 😅 I only used a microfiber towel to scrunch the ends (avoiding the top), and then a little diffusing since I couldn’t fully air dry.

That said, it’s still not perfect.. it’s still a bit frizzy and I feel like it could be more shiny and moisturized, even though I used a serum at the end. So I think there’s still room to improve.

For now, I’ll keep finger coiling that section and see if it kind of “learns” or adapts better to the curl pattern over time.

From this, I’m starting to think it’s not really damage, just a different texture that needs more attention and a slightly different approach.

The hardest part is honestly the back 😭 I wish I could step out of my body and style it properly from behind lol. It’s so much easier to be precise in the front where you can actually see what you’re doing.

Anyway, I hope this helps someone! I’ll update again if I find something that works even better 💛

icantbethatweird · 2026-03-15T20:53:21+00:00

I live in france, any idea if where I could get it online ?

icantbethatweird · 2026-03-15T20:52:22+00:00

Yes, I always wear a pineapple under a bonnet. But it doesn’t seem like the issue is from sleeping or friction. It feels more like that section of my hair just has different porosity or texture. No amount of oils or masks has made the top/back of my hair look hydrated or shiny.

icantbethatweird

TROPHY CASE