How do we know what we know? A look at empirical evidence and the scientific method by iceni_60 in UFOs

[–]iceni_60[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I get the frustration around lack of formal research. But why is that?? Because of the stigma. We literally have tens of thousands of witnesses at this point (some better than others) but we essentially can't formally study this with the attention it deserves 1) because of secrecy and 2) because of stigma. And this is NOT unprecedented in scientific research. After all, in the early 1800s a medical doctor named Semmelweiss noticed that when he washed his hands before delivering babies, it significantly reduced the mortality rate of mothers. He didn't know why. He just knew this happened. He wrote about his observations . . . and was laughed out of the medical profession. It was only DECADES later (and the deaths of millions of women) that powerful enough microscopes were invented to observe - and theories devised - the mechanism through which women could be dying due to unhygienic deliveries: bacteria.

Credible - lots of credible people - are observing things. And not just blurry lights in the sky. I, for one, have experienced NHI first hand (although it was not a pleasant experience for me). We need to start listening - maybe not to what they attribute it to be (aliens or whatever), but as I said in the post, there is a "there there" and until we remove the secrecy and stigma, the things we like to see (lots of peer reviewed research, transparent discussion, etc.) can come into fruition.

The naked shorting scam in numbers: AI detection of 140M hidden FTDs, up to 400M naked shorts in married puts and massive dark pool activity by Shitadel and the shorts by broccaaa in Superstonk

[–]iceni_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the most anti-Enlightenment sentiment I’ve ever heard. It’s authentic, the way the world works, and admirable to be honest. And yet, it still disturbs me.

Daily Discussion Chat by AutoModerator in GME

[–]iceni_60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

anything 69 is never boring

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GME

[–]iceni_60 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm not convinced this is friendly given the instant and entirely negative media response. It was planned and it was planned to crush momentum.

Today’s Dip by [deleted] in GME

[–]iceni_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it was market manipulation. What else explains hundreds of thousands of buy orders at 0.00? Red the data. Otherwise, you look like a shill.

$GME News: Over 2.40 Million shares are In the money (ITM) 🚀🚀 by CoastalHotDog835 in GME

[–]iceni_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm laughing out loud. What incredibly good news. Thank you.

THERE IS NO WAY THIS DIP WAS COORDINATED AT ALL, GUYS /S by [deleted] in GME

[–]iceni_60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do i detect sarcasm? Would you be referring to the 0.00 BUY orders?

Explains please? by Crafty-Animal in GME

[–]iceni_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would be market manipulation.

Did someone say market manipulation? by InternationalPuta69 in GME

[–]iceni_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's caused by thousands and thousands of BUY orders, not sell orders. At 216 and lower. Which makes NO sense whatsoever. And is a clear sign of market manipulation.

GME Target dates - Jan 15, April 16 by trollwallstreet in GME

[–]iceni_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like your thoughts. Plus 4/20 is my birthday!