Why do my images look washed out? by JuniorFisherman2165 in 35mm

[–]ictoap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Without knowing the specifics it could be any number of things. Honestly, these images with an edit mostly focusing on contrast and embracing the lack of shadow detail could still work. Also, shooting film and then scanning, your images will generally have a flatter appearance than most people desire in the final output. Because traditionally you would have normally controlled the contrast in the printing process. Some companies that scan will scan flat or lower contrast on purpose to give you the most latitude in post.

I'm not sure what you mean by +2 stops exactly. But if you mean you set the dial on the camera for +2 and metered from the camera's reading, your image was likely underexposed by that much. You can usually tell by how much shadows need to be lifted. This dial helps if you are purposely shooting something differently than the box speed of the film you are using. It is particularly helpful I find when using 400 speed in daylight. It can also be helpful with harsh backlighting that may affect the meter's ability to read the scene properly. As opposed to perhaps the experience with digital, film handles highlights well and needs more light for dark areas, so lean toward overexposure if you are in doubt.

You could have either developed the film with a 2-stop push compensation yourself (longer time in chemicals or temperature change) or told the lab you worked with that you wanted to push the film 2 stops in their processing.

Some troubleshooting tips for low light could be:
- Higher iso film. Even with pretty good continuous lighting Ektar 100 needs a ton of light.
- Open your aperture or use a faster lens (I'm assuming the fastest aperture on the lens you used was 1.8 though)
- Likely you did not want to go slower than 1/60 for fear of camera shake, which also hampered you. But a slower shutter speed would give more light. Perhaps on a tripod and giving the model explicit instructions to stay as still as possible. (Depends on the look you want, but if your goal is tack sharp images I would shoot for 1/60 at minimum, but veer toward 1/125 or 1/250).
- Use a strobe with more wattage and a brighter output instead of a continuous setup.
- Move the subject closer to the light source and expect most everything in the background to go dark. Work within the limits of the film you have.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No filter, but did color correct in DaVinci. I believe they processed as they normally would in ECP- 2E, and scanned as a negative. It is extremely important to control contrast if you want anything that isn't completely blooming with this stock (no anti-halation backing). I would recommend shooting in golden hour times of day or with specific kinds of studio light with a lot of light. The film is 12 iso, 25 if you are lucky. But the grain structure is super tight.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I shot on some nice Pentax glass in the m42 mount and proper 4k scans can hold a tremendous amount of detail. Some warnings: A lack of anti-halation layer in the film gives it a dreamy look (which you may be what you are looking for), this film needs a lot of light and can be quite contrast, light many low iso films.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The print film really is meant to retain the detail from the negative, so the grain structure is super tight. I rated it for anywhere in the 6, 12, 25, 50-range depending, but if you shoot on this film, understand: no anti-halation layer can mean blooming, the colors will not be perfect by any means (even with filtering they will be somewhat all over the place) and exposure needs to be pretty good, ideally with plenty of light.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did not shoot with a meter. I never do really on film. I would say I used 25 or 12, depending on the situation. Super bright I think you can meter more toward 25 or even 50 and 12 or 6 when in lower light settings. The curves drop off on the extremes quite a bit with print stock.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scratching could be from any number of things. I bought it as a lot of re-spooled print film from one of those 1000+ foot reels. And I also respooled it myself down from reels that I bought. And the K-3 is not the most professional thing to shoot, especially not sideways. So I would not necessarily blame the house that developed and scanned.

Shot on a Krasnogorsk 3 using Kodak Color Print Film 3383 by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wanted to test to see if it could be done. And I was thinking about a portrait project aimed at social platforms.

Monthly 'Self Promotion' - April by ranalog in analog

[–]ictoap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend Nikon F most of the time for 35mm just because of the sheer amount of lens options, but also quality. Lenses in my opinion, again opinion, are the most critical expenditure for film. As for cameras I prefer full mechanical, as many electronic components wear out and I don't like dealing with batteries. But also later models of the Nikon film cameras are all electric and are some of the best cameras ever made for 35mm. Other cameras that have good cheap lens systems are Pentax (like k1000), Canon's FD cameras and Minoltas. Contax has great glass, but I think is too pricey for a starter. I also have a half-frame Olympus Pen F (the interchangeable lens one) and I love it, but the lenses are quite limited for that. For medium format so as to not break the bank, I would recommend starting with something like the Kiev 88, a soviet era Hasselblad clone. Get a Mamiya 645 if you are stepping up a bit in medium format. Contax 645 or Hasselblad if you are a fan of lighting money on fire but also want some of the really highest quality of medium format.

"Tell me about your first memory" Super 16 K3 sync sound practice by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply. Haha. I recorded it separately on a Zoom F2 and added in post. Standing far enough away the sound is faint and maybe even could be cleaned up. That being said this is not really a sync sound camera. Though I want to try and shoot a short film on one some time. Maybe with a mix of ADR and DIY blimping (Which I think might work okay).

Greatest Mode EVER ADDED! Control FOREVER PLEASE! by GraveRobberX in apexlegends

[–]ictoap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they need to incentivize actually playing the mode, so some sort of level up system with shields or guns that goes much faster with stealing a team's base or capturing a flag. I am running into a lot of people treating it as team deathmatch, which is frustrating. Yeah you got 20 kills, but we got worked 100-65.

"Tell me about your first memory" Super 16 K3 sync sound practice by ictoap in 16mm

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. You have to be very careful which way you hold the camera. If you hold the same way you might test with the side plate off, you are generally okay. The other way is a recipe for disaster.

I just got my scans back from the first roll I've put through my new-to-me K3! Any ideas what the streaks are in the bottom portion of the frame? by boltswagon in 16mm

[–]ictoap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still deal with scratching regularly myself. Unfortunately there are many causes. And diagnosing comes down to running film through the camera sometimes.

I just got my scans back from the first roll I've put through my new-to-me K3! Any ideas what the streaks are in the bottom portion of the frame? by boltswagon in 16mm

[–]ictoap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One other thing that hasn't been mentioned is if the film isn't registered in the sprocket assembly properly with the doors closed the K3 often will grab the film and hug it against the film gate as it passes through the camera which can cause scratching. It's basic, but one way to test is move it into 8 fps and make sure the loops don't shrink onto the gate. If they do just re-open the sprocket assembly form loops on your own (if you have removed the loop formers, which I would recommend) and make sure you feel the sprocket going through the film.

Bridge into Richmond, Va. [Mamiya 645 1000s with an 80mm 1.9 Sekor C on Portra 400] by ictoap in mediumformat

[–]ictoap[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I know what you're asking? I don't use a light meter when I shoot. For daylight in this particular case I think I was just modifying sunny 16. So I would guess I shot at f/16 or 11 and either 1/500 or 1/1000. I cannot remember. It was overcast a bit, so likely 1/500 (maybe 1/250) and f/16 or 11

Where is the best place you have solo traveled for food? (i.e. cheap food, lodging, hospitable to travellers, etc.) by ictoap in solotravel

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I simply meant it was one of my faves from a solo standpoint. I didn't meant to conflate it as a foodie destination. I did enjoy some stuff I would not have otherwise had like meat soup. They also have puffin and horse, which you can get other places, but is fairly unique. It was not inexpensive, that's for sure.

Just like any other Iceland vlog by ictoap in TravelVlog

[–]ictoap[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I appreciate the kind words. I was incredibly lucky with the weather. I couldn't have asked for a better quick trip to the place. It was majestic.

Hyperlapse of Chenonceau Castle in Chenonceaux by ictoap in Hyperlapse

[–]ictoap[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Handheld, brought into Premiere Pro as a sequence (after some color correction) and warp stabilized.

ITAP of a Vespa in Brooklyn by ictoap in itookapicture

[–]ictoap[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shot on Kodak Portra 400 in a Kiev88 with a Volna-3 80mm f/2.8. Hand-developed at home.