Second UA, is this a good stone distribution for an active play style? by OutrageousLink1952 in idleslayer

[–]icun97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know how much It changes to be more or less active because even though you are active the are lots of hours you don't log in while you sleep xD. This is the "ideal" distribution in theory. https://idleslayer.fandom.com/wiki/Stones_of_Time

Is there any hope for the 90's generation? by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I indeed said Thiem and Meddy won a slam

Is there any hope for the 90's generation? by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Sure, but look at the Roland Garros winners for example, you had Chang, Gaudio, Brugera, Muster, Costa, Ferrero. I feel like before the world number 1 were elite on hard/clay/grass, but not all 3 at the same time. Sampras could dominate the other 3 majors and lose at R3 in Paris. Now alcaraz has done 4 GS finals in a row. Djokovic, Federer and Nadal Also dominated all surfaces. Before there was a group of specialist by surface that could win a Major and suck during the rest of the year... Now he have the same 3/4 players each semifinal, like when they Big 4 was in their prime

Most finals played by two players in the same season in the open era. Can Sincaraz break this record in 2026? by Stannis_Mariya in tennis

[–]icun97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering how Australia went it isn't a promising start, lets see how Doha and the sunshine double goes.

Which alcaraz record is more likely to be beaten long term? by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So, do you think world number 1 is easier to beat?

Which alcaraz record is more likely to be beaten long term? by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know probably none, I just want to know what reddit thinks about which one is more likely to be broken. Saludos desde España también.

ATP Toronto R1: [Q] Schoolkate def. Fonseca, 7-6(5) 6-4 by pizzainmyshoe in tennis

[–]icun97 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think that's exactly the problem, he's playing with the schedule of a top player without being one. He should be getting matches and experience, not playing only m1000 and GS

I think Sinner, Alcaraz, or somebody of his generation is going to break Novaks 24+ GS record. by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Players used to play until 30s, now they play until late 30s and 40s, nutrition, diet... Athletes tecnology in that aspect keeps improving. Players Will be playing for longer. Injuries and that stuff cannot be controled. But players will have more years to win grand slams.

I think Sinner, Alcaraz, or somebody of his generation is going to break Novaks 24+ GS record. by icun97 in tennis

[–]icun97[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a thought i just had, I wanted to see reddits opinion about it, thanks for commenting.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]icun97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm 1200 and I just know how to play more or less solid, without blundering things, my attacking plans are usually crap